本研究旨在瞭解當前新北市公立國民中學校長正向領導、教育設施品質與學校競爭優勢之現況，探討不同背景變項之教師在校長正向領導、教育設施品質與學校競爭優勢之差異情形，分析校長正向領導、教育設施品質與學校競爭優勢之相關性，探究校長正向領導、教育設施品質對學校競爭優勢之預測力。
本研究採用問卷調查法，所採用之校長正向領導、教育設施品質與學校競爭優勢問卷具有良好的信度與效度。以公立國民中學之教師為母群體，共計抽樣38所公立國民中學，發出631份問卷，回收有效問卷422份，回收有效率達66.88%。回收問卷以描述性統計、t檢定、單因子變異數分析、皮爾遜積差相關及多元逐步迴歸分析之統計方法進一步探討。
本研究歸納結論如下：
一、 新北市公立國民中學教師對校長正向領導的知覺程度現況屬「中高」程度，以「正向意義」構面表現最佳。
二、 新北市公立國民中學教師對教育設施品質的知覺程度現況屬「中高」程度，以「充實的教學設備」構面表現最佳。
三、 新北市公立國民中學教師對學校競爭優勢的知覺程度現況屬「中高」程度，以「組織能力優勢」構面表現最佳。
四、 新北市公立國民中學教師以男性、51歲（含）以上及學校規模在43班（含）以上者，對校長正向領導之知覺程度顯著較高。
五、 新北市公立國民中學教師以男性、擔任教師兼主任及學校規模在25至42班者，對教育設施品質之知覺程度顯著較高。
六、 新北市公立國民中學教師以男性、30歲（含）以下、擔任教師兼主任、教職總服務年資5年（含）以下及學校規模在43班（含）以上者，對學校競爭優勢之知覺程度顯著較高。
七、 新北市公立國民中學校長正向領導、教育設施品質與學校競爭優勢整體三者之間有顯著正相關。
八、 校長正向領導與教育設施品質對學校競爭優勢能夠產生影響，且具有相當之預測力。

最後依據本研究結果，提出具體建議，以供教育行政當局、學校管理階層以及教育學術界後進之研究指引。

The purpose of this study is to understand the current situation of principals' positive leadership, the quality of education facilities, and school competitive advantages in public junior high schools in New Taipei City. The study is trying to analyize the above three variables by the different backgrounds of teachers and investigate the relationship of these three variables. It explores the differences in teachers' perceptions of these three variables across different background variables, analyzes their correlations, and investigates the predictive power of principals' positive leadership and the quality of education facilities on school competitive advantage.
A questionnaire survey method was adopted. The scales utilized for measuring principals' positive leadership, the quality of education facilities, and school competitive advantages demonstrated sound reliability and validity. With teachers from public junior high schools as the population, a total of 38 public junior high schools were sampled, and 631 questionnaires were distributed. Among them, 422 valid questionnaires were retrieved, yielding an effective recovery rate of 66.88%. The retrieved data were analyzed using statistical methods including descriptive statistics, independent samples t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson's product-moment correlation, and stepwise multiple regression analysis.
The main conclusions of this study are summarized as follows:
1. Teachers' current perception of principals' positive leadership in public junior high schools in New Taipei City is at a "moderately high" level, with the "positive meaning" dimension scoring the highest.
2. Teachers' current perception of educational facility quality is at a "moderately high" level, with the "substantial instructional equipment" dimension scoring the highest.
3. Teachers' current perception of school competitive advantages is at a "moderately high" level, with the "organizational competence advantage" dimension scoring the highest.
4. Teachers who are male, aged 51 and above, and serving in schools with 43 or more classes perceive significantly higher levels of principals' positive leadership.
5. Teachers who are male, serving as directors, and working in schools with 25 to 42 classes perceive significantly higher levels of educational facility quality.
6. Teachers who are male, aged 30 and below, serving as directors, having 5 or fewer years of total teaching seniority, and working in schools with 43 or more classes perceive significantly higher levels of school competitive advantage.
7. Principals' positive leadership, the quality of education facilities, and school competitive advantages are moderately to highly correlated with each other.
8. Principals' positive leadership and the quality of education facilities can predict school competitive advantages.

Finally, based on the research results, concrete suggestions are proposed as references and guidelines for educational administrative authorities, school administrative leadership, and future academic researchers.

中文文獻
于宗先（1990）。臺灣學校建築的時代觀。教育研究，13，13–17。
江本勝（2002）。生命的答案，水知道。如何。
吳明隆、張毓仁（2018）。SPSS問卷統計分析快速上手祕笈。五南。
吳珮青（2022）國民小學校長空間領導、教師知識分享與學校競爭優勢關係之
研究〔未出版之博士論文〕。國立政治大學。
吳清山（2004）。學校行銷管理的理念與策略。北縣教育，47，23-34。
吳清山（2011）。我國高等教育革新的重要課題與未來發展之分析。長庚人文社會學報，4（2），241-280。
吳清山、林天祐（1994）全面品質管理及其在教育上的應用。初等教育學刊，3，1-28。
呂彥杰（2018）。雙北地區國民小學校長正向領導、學校創新經營與學校競爭優勢關係之研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立政治大學。
呂賢玲（2019）新北市立國民中學學校設施品質、教師創新教學與學生學習成效關係之研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立政治大學。
李怡禎、張家宜（2002）。高等教育行政人員全面品質教育管理教育訓練課程內涵之研究。教育資料與研究，0（44），77-88。
李俊毅（2018）。公立高中職校長正向領導、教師學術樂觀與教師專業發展相關之研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立政治大學。
周鼎金（1998）。學校教室照明推廣手冊。內政部建築研究所。
林新發（2010）。正向領導的意涵與實施策略。國民教育，50（3），1-5。
林新發（2011）。華人地區學校校長正向領導模式初探。國民教育，52（1），1-6。
林智遠（2024）。桃園市國民中學教育設施品質、教師專業學習社群與學校競爭優勢關係之研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立政治大學。
邱皓政（2010）。量化研究與統計分析：SPSS(PASW)資料分析範例解析。五南。
施佳儀（2023）。臺北市公立國民小學教育設施品質、教學效能與學校競爭優勢關之研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立政治大學。
施淑文（1994）。建築環境色彩設計。淑馨出版社。
修金莒（2020）。國民小學校長正向領導、教師專業承諾與學校創新效能關係之研究〔未出版之博士論文〕。國立政治大學。
徐仁斌（2022）國民中學校長正向領導、教師社群互動與組織執行力關係之研究〔未出版之博士論文〕。國立政治大學。
秦夢群（2010）教育領導理論與應用。五南。
教育部（2009）。加速國中小老舊校舍及相關設備補強整建計畫（核訂本）。
國民小學及國民中學設施設備基準（2019年7月24日）。
教育部（編）（2012）。第七次中華民國教育年鑑。教育部。
教育部國民及學前教育署（2016年2月17日）。國教署持續推動國民中小學老舊
校舍補強整建確保學校師生安全。https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&sms=169B8E91BB75571F&s=E81C0B2786A1B553
許毓娟（2016）。高屏地區國中校長願景領導、組織信任、組織創新氣氛與學校競爭優勢關係之研究〔未出版之博士論文〕。國立高雄師範大學。
陳志修（2004）。從TQM的管理哲學看國民小學的教育設施規劃。初等教育學刊，18，129-156。
陳秉筠（2020）。國民小學校長彈性領導與學校競爭優勢關係之研究：以教師專業承諾及組織學習為中介變項〔未出版之博士論文〕。國立高雄師範大學。
陳詠禎（2016）。國民小學校長領導與教育品質關係之研究–以教師的組織信任為中介變項〔未出版之博士論文〕。國立屏東大學。
游博鈞（2023）。國民小學校長正向領導、教師創新教學與學校競爭優勢關係之研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立政治大學。
湯志民（2012）。境教的實質影響力。師友月刊，544，9-13。
湯志民（2018）。臺灣國民中學學校建築發展與革新。教育研究集刊，64（4），37-76。
湯志民（2019）臺北市國民小學校長空間領導、教育設施品質與學生學習成效關係之研究（計畫編號：MOST 107-2410-H-004-152-SSS）。國家科學及技術委員會。
湯志民、袁亭雅、劉耘汝（2021）。國民小學校長空間領導、教育設施品質與教學效能關係之研究。教育與心理研究，44（1），35-67。
湯志民（2022）。國民中學教育設施品質、教學效能與學生學業成績關係之研究（計畫編號：MOST 110-2410-H-004-131-SSS）。國家科學及技術委員會。
黃千盈（2021）國民小學校長正向領導、教師工作士氣與學校效能關係之研究：以澎湖縣及新北市為例〔未出版之博士論文〕。國立臺北教育大學。
黃丞傑（2020）。臺灣地區公立國民小學校長正向領導、教師專業社群文化與教學效能關係之研究〔未出版之博士論文〕。國立臺北教育大學。
黃微清（2024）。臺北市中等學校校長空間領導對學校品牌形象影響之研究：以教育設施品質為中介變項〔未出版之博士論文〕。臺北市立大學。
黃淑芬（2018）。南部地區國小校長正向領導與學校效能關係之研究—以教師心理資本、學校翻轉教學為中介變項〔未出版之博士論文〕。國立高雄師範大學。
曾若玫（2017）。國民小學校長正向領導、教師學術樂觀與學校效能關係之研究〔未出版之博士論文〕。國立臺北教育大學。
曾榮華（1999）。全面品質管理與學校建築品質。國民教育研究集刊，7，81-89。
楊文堯（2016）。高職校長變革領導、教師組織承諾、學校組織文化與學校競爭優勢關係之研究〔未出版之博士論文〕。國立高雄師範大學。
楊雅婷（2020）。高級中學校長正向領導、教師幸福感與學校效能關係之研究。〔未出版之博士論文〕。國立政治大學。
楊茵茵（2021）。臺北市國民小學校長空間領導、教育設施品質與學校效能關係之研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立政治大學。
張本文（2015）。國小校長服務領導、教師領導、學校組織文化與學校競爭優勢關係之研究〔未出版之博士論文〕。國立屏東大學。
廖文靜（2011）。學校設施品質與教育成果關係之研究〔未出版之博士論文〕。國立政治大學。
劉耘汝（2020）。臺北市國民小學校長空間領導、學校組織文化與學校效能關係之研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立政治大學。
黎素君（2019）。國民小學校長正向領導、學校組織變革與學校競爭優勢關係之研究〔未出版之博士論文〕。臺北市立大學。
賴協志、吳清山（2016）。高級中等學校校長正向領導量表之發展與運用。教育與心理研究，39，29-59。
蔡秀子（2021）。宜蘭縣立國民中學學校設施品質、學校組織氣氛與學生學習成效關係之研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立政治大學。
蔡琇韶（2017）。國民小學校長正向領導、教師正向心理資本、教師組織承諾與學校效能關係之研究〔未出版之博士論文〕。國立高雄師範大學。
噪音管制區劃定作業準則（2020年8月5日）。
謝傳崇（2012）。校長正向領導：理念、研究與實踐。高等教育。
鍾享龍（2017）國民小學校長正向領導、教師正向心理資本、組織學習與學校競爭優勢關係之研究〔未出版之博士論文〕。國立高雄師範大學。
鍾德馨（2020）。臺北市國民小學校長正向領導、學校組織健康與學校效能關係之研究〔未出版之博士論文〕。國立政治大學。
蘇奕娟（2019）。國民小學校長正向領導、教師專業素養與學生學習關係之研究〔未出版之博士論文〕。國立臺北教育大學。
英文文獻
Ali, N., Khan, A. B., & Ahmad, T. (2020). Effects of school building on academic achievement of secondary school students in Southern KP, Pakistan. Global Educational Studies Review, 5(2), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2020(V-II).04
Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001
Baker, L., & Bernstein, H. (2012). The impact of school buildings on student health and performance: A call for research. McGraw-Hill Research Foundation.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Barrett, F. J., & Fry, R. E. (2005). Appreciative inquiry: A positive approach to building cooperative capacity. Taos Institute Publications
Barrett, P., Zhang, Y., Moffat, J., & Kobbacy, K. (2013). A holistic, multi-level analysis identifying the impact of classroom design on pupils’ learning. Building and Environment, 59, 678–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.09.016
Bernstein, S. D. (2003). Positive organizational scholarship: Meet the movement: An interview with Kim Cameron, Jane Dutton, and Robert Quinn. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12(3), 266–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492603256341
Caldwell, B. J., & Spinks, J. M. (1992). Leading the self-managing school. Falmer Press.
Cameron, K. S. (2008). Positive leadership: Strategies for extraordinary performance. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Cameron, K. S. (2012). Positive leadership: Strategies for extraordinary performance (2nd ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Cameron, K. S., Bright, D., & Caza, A. (2004). Exploring the relationships between organizational virtuousness and performance. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6), 766–790. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764203260209
Cameron, K. S., & Caza, A. (2002). Organizational and leadership virtues and the role of forgiveness. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190200900103
Cameron, K. S., Dutton, J. E., & Quinn, R. E. (Eds.). (2003). Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Cooperrider, D. L., & Whitney, D. (2005). Appreciative inquiry: A positive revolution in change. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Cutler, W. W., III. (1989). Cathedral of culture: The schoolhouse in American educational thought and practice since 1820. History of Education Quarterly, 29(1), 1–40.
Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the Crisis. MIT Press.
Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Dinkmeyer, D., & Losoncy, L. (2000). The skills of encouragement: Bringing out the best in yourself and others. CRC Press.
Drucker, P. F. (1969). The age of discontinuity: Guidelines to our changing society. Harper & Row.
Earthman, G. I. (1998). The relationship between school building condition and student achievement: An examination of literature. University of California, Los Angeles. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234576815_The_Impact_of_School_Building_Condition_and_Student_Achievement_and_Behavior
Earthman, G. I. (2002). School facility conditions and student academic achievement. Institute for Democracy, Education, and Access, University of California, Los Angeles. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5sw56439
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114–135. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166664
Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity. Teachers College Press.
Jehn, K. A., & Bendersky, C. (2003). Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict-outcome relationship. In B. M. Staw & R. M. Kramer (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 25, pp. 189–244). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25005-X
Juran, J. M. (1989). Juran on leadership for quality: An executive handbook. Free Press.
Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2005). Blue ocean strategy: How to create uncontested market space and make the competition irrelevant. Harvard Business Review Press
Lackney, J. A. (1999). Reading a school like a book: The influence of the physical school setting on learning and literacy. School Design Research Studio.
Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. Learning from Leadership Project. The Wallace Foundation
Lemasters, L. K. (1997). A synthesis of studies pertaining to facilities, student achievement, and student behavior. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED447687)
Lewis, S. (2011). Positive psychology at work: How positive leadership and appreciative inquiry create inspiring organizations. Wiley.
Luthans, F. (2002). Positive organizational behavior: Developing and managing psychological strengths. Academy of Management Executive, 16(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2002.6640181
Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2004). Human, social, and now positive psychological capital management: Investing in people for competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 33(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2004.01.003
Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2007). Emerging positive organizational behavior. Journal of Management, 33(3), 308–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307300814
Luthans, F., Luthans, K. W., Hodgetts, R. M., & Luthans, B. C. (2001). Positive approach to leadership (PAL) implications for today’s organizations. The Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(2), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190100800201
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346
Maxwell, L. E. (1999). School building renovation and student performance: One district's experience. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED443272).
Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. MIT Press.
Naveh, E., Erez, M., & Zonnenshain, A. (1998). Developing a TQM implementation model. Quality Progress, 31(2), 55–59.
OECD. (1996). The knowledge-based economy. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2006). PEB organising framework for evaluating quality in educational facilities. OECD Publishing.
Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.
Preiser, W. F. E., Rabinowitz, H. Z., & White, E. T. (1988). Post-occupancy evaluation. Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Ranken, J. C. (1982, September). Lighting for our schools [Paper presentation]. The Annual Meeting of the Council of Educational Facility Planners, International, Columbus, OH, United States. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED305751)
Redican, K. J., Olsen, L. K., & Baffi, C. R. (1986). Organization of school health programs. Macmillan Publishing Company.
Sallis, E. (1996). Total quality management in education (2nd ed.). Kogan Page.
Schneider, M. (2002). Do school facilities affect academic outcomes? National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED470979.pdf
Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Positive psychology, positive prevention, and positive therapy. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 3–9). Oxford University Press.
Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Free Press.
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5
SitelogiQ. (2020, June 3). How K-12 facilities impact student learning and health. https://www.sitelogiq.com/blog/k12-facilities-impact-student-learning-health/
Spreitzer, G. M., & Sonenshein, S. (2003). Positive deviance and extraordinary organizing. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 207–224). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Sutcliffe, K. M., & Vogus, T. J. (2003). Organizing for resilience. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 94–110). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Uline, C., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2008). The walls speak: The interplay of quality facilities, school climate, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230810849817
Wagner, C. (2000). Planning schools grounds for outdoor learning. National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities.
Whitney, D., & Schau, C. (1998). Appreciative inquiry: An innovative process for organization change. Employment Relations Today, 25(1), 11-21.
Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. L. (1982). Broken windows: The police and neighborhood safety. The Atlantic Monthly, 249(3), 29–38.
Youssef, C. M., & Luthans, F. (2012). Positive leadership: Meaning, antecedents, and outcomes. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 29(2), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.210