無

"甲：中文部份：
李棟明：「台灣地區家庭計劃的倡導與推行機構」。社會建設季刊第十七號，民國六十二年八月出版(1973)。
李棟明：「台灣地區家庭計劃工作簡介」，孫得雄著「人口問題與家庭計劃」，幼獅書店印行，民國六十一年，第60〜63頁。(1972)
李亦園：「人類學與現代社會」，牧童出版社印行，民國六十四年，第57〜95頁。(1975)吳聰賢：「從子女價值談人口增加問題」。綜合月刊，民國六十三年二月，第六十三期，第19〜24頁。(1974)。
吳聰賢、蘇雅惠：台灣農家社會經濟地位之測度，中國社會學刊，第二期，中國社會學社出版，民國六十一年十二月(1972)。
林秀雲：「影响有偶婦女理想子女數的社會因素分析，台大農業推廣研究所碩士論文，民國六十一年七月(1972)。
孫得雄：「台灣婦女生育力差異之社會結構分析」，（中譯本），台灣家庭計劃研究所籌備處，民國五十九年四月出版。(1970)
徐佳士：「台北市家庭主婦對冢庭計劃宣傳的反應」，新聞學研究第十四集，政大新聞研究所，民國六十三年十一月出版。(1974)
徐佳士、楊孝濚、潘家慶：「台灣地區民眾家庭計劃傳播模式、通道、訴求、與反應」，政大新聞研究所，民國六十四年出版。(1975)
張坤崗：「由系統分析看台灣地區之家庭計劃」，人與社會雙月刊，第一卷第六期，民國六十三年二月出版，第7〜13頁。(1974)
黃肇松：「大眾媒介與親身接觸在台灣農村家庭計劃消息傳播中擔任之角色」，政大新聞研究所，民國六十三年七月，碩士論文。(1974)
楊國樞：「人口心理學」，楊國樞著「中國人民的現代化」，眾成出版社，民國六十五年出版，第160〜196頁。(1976)
劉清格：「影响家庭子女多寡的因素分析」，中美人文社會科學研究委員會，民國六十三年。(1974)
鄭振煌：「家庭計劃消息對台灣都市婦女的傳播效果研究」，政大新聞研究所，碩士論文，民國六十三年七月。(1974)
蕭崑杉：「影响子女價值與生育力差異的社會心理因子研究」，台大農業推廣研究所，碩士論文，民國六十二年六月。(1973)
衛惠林：台灣風土志，台灣中華書局出版，民國四十五年。(1956)
(1) Allen, I. L. “Social relations and the two-step flow: A defense of the tradition”, Journalism Quarterly, Autumn, 1969.
(2) Allen, J. J. and Cohen, S. “Information flow in research and development laboratories”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 14:12-19, 1969.
(3) APA Task Force on Psychology, Family Planning, and Population Policy. “Population and family planning: growing involvement of Psychologists”. American Psychologist, 27, 27-30, 1972.
(4) Atkin, C. K. “Anticipated communication and mass media information-seeking”, Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 36(72): 188-99, 1972.
(5) Berlo, D. K. The Process of Communication. New York: Holf, Rinehart and Winston, 1960.
(6) Blau, P. M. “Patterns of choice in inter-personal relations”, American Sociological Review, 27, 41-55, 1962.
(7) Blau, P. M. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1964.
(8) Bogue, D. J. Mass Communication and Motivation for Birth Control. University of Chicago, 1967.
(9) Bohlen, J. M. “Research needed on adoption models”, in Schramm W. and Donald E. R. The Process and Effects of Mass Communication, Rev. Ed. University of Illinois Press, 1971.
(10) Boissevain, J. Friends of Friends: Network, Manipulators and Coalitions. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1974.
(11) Caplow, T. and Forman, R. “Neighborhood interaction in a homogonous community”, Sociological Review 15:351-366, 1950.
(12) Cernada, G. and Sun, T. H. How Evaluation Studies Help Provide Answers to Taiwan's Population Problem: Focus on Communication. for East- West Communication Workship, Taiwan, Mimeo. 1972.
(13) Cherry, C. On Human Communication. Boston: M.I.T. Press. 1959.
(14) Coleman, J. S., Katz E. and Menzel H. “The diffusion of an innovation among Physicians. ” Sociometry. 20. 253-270. 1957.
(15) Goleman, J. S “Relational analysis: the study of social organization with survey methods”, Human Organization 16(summer): 28-36. 1950.
(16) Committee on Family Planning, Taiwan Provincial Department of Health, Interim
Report of Survey and Research Projects, T-258, SR-64 April, 1973.
(17) Committee on Family Planning, Taiwan Provincial Department of Health, Taiwan
Population Studies Summaries, Taichung, Nov. 1973.
(18) Fawcett, J. T. (ed.): Psychological Perspectives on Population. New York: Basic Books, Inc, 1973.
(19) Feather, H. T., “A structural balance model of communication effects”. Psychological Review, 71:291-313, 1964.
(20) Festinger, L. A., Schachter, S. and Back, K.: Social Pressures in Informal Groups.
Stanford, California: Stanford University Press 1950.
(21) Festinger, L. A. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
(22) Festinger, L. A. “A theory of social comparison -processes”, Human Relations, 7:117-140. 1954.
(23) Freedman, R., Takeshita, J. Y. and Sun, T. H. ”Fertility and family planning in Taiwan: a
case study of the demographic transition”, American Journal of Sociology, 70, 16-27.1964.
(24) Furu, T. The Function of Television for Children and Adolescent. Tokyo: Sophia University. 1971.
(25) Galluhorn, J. “Distance and friendship as factors in the gross interaction matrix”, Sociometry. 15:123-134, 1952.
(26) Hägerstrand, T. The Propagation of Innovation Waves. Lund studios in Geography, Lund, Sweden: Royal University of Lund. 1952.
(27) Harary, F., Norman, R, Z, and Cartwright, D., Structural models: an introduction to the theory of directed graphs . New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1965.
(28) Heider, F. “Attitudes and cognitive organization”, Journal of Psychology. 21 :107-112, 1946.
(29) Heider, F. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations, New York: Wiley, 1958.
(30) Homans, G. C. The Human Group. New York: Harcourt, Brace & world. P184. 1950.
(31) Homans, G. C. Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms New York: Harcourt, 1961.
(32) Katz, E., Levin, M. L. and Hamilton H. “Traditions of research on the diffusion of
innovation , American Sociological Review, April,28,237-252.1963.
(33) Katz E. and Lazarsfeld, .F., Personal Influence, P219-222, 1955.
(34) Katz, E. Blumer, J. F. and Curevitch, M.“Uses and gratifications research”, Public Opinion Quarterly. Vol. 37-3.(73-74): 509-23
(35) Katz, E., Gurevitch, M and Hass, M. ”On tho use of mass media for important things”,
American Sociological Review, 38, 1973.
(36)King, M. J. ”Sociometric status and sociometric choice ”, Social Forces, 39:199-206. 1961.
(37) Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B. and Gaudet, M. The People's Choice New York: Columbia University Press. 1944.
(38) Lionberger, E. F., Chii-Jong Yeh and Copus, G. D., “Social change in communication structure: comparative study of farmers in two communities“, Rural Sociological Society Monograph, No.3, West Virginia University, 1975.
(39) Lionberger, H. F. and Campbell R. R. “Structure influences of personal attributes on social and informational relationships of farm operators in a Missouri community”, Rural Sociology.,
36. 533-546. 1971.
(40) Lionberger, H. F. “The dyad as a basic unit for interpersonal communication and influence
Research”, paper presented at the second World congress of Rural Sociology,, Drienerlo/
Eschende, The Netherland, August,. 5-10, 1968.
(41) Lionberger, H. F., Ghii-Jeng Yeh and Copus G. D. “The changing structure of farm information flow through interpersonal networks in two Missouri communities“, 1956-1966, Research Bulletin, Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station, Columbia, Missouri. 1972.
(42) Lionbeger, H. F. Adoption of Ideas and Practices, Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1960.
(43) Lionberger; H. F. and Coughenour, C. M., “Social structure and diffusion of farm
information. Research Bulletin 631, Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station, Columbia, Missouri, 1957.
(44) Lionberger, H.F., “Some characteristics of farm operators sought as sources of farm information in a Missouri community”, Rural Sociology, XVIII, December, 327-338, 1953.
(45) Meeker, B. F., “Decisions and Exchange”. American Sociological Review. 36:485-495. 1971.
(46) Mortensen, C. D., Communication: The Study of Human Interaction. N.. Y.: McGraw-Hill Book Company, P55-60. 1972.
(47) Newcomb, T. N. “An approach to the study of communicative acts ”, Psychological Review , 60;393-404. 1953.
(48) Palmore, J. A., “The Chicago snowball: a study of the flow ad diffusion of family planning information”, in Bogue, D. J. Ed. Sociological Contributions to Family Planning Research, University of Chicago, Community and Family Study Centers,1967.
(49) Pohlman, E. H., Psychology of Birth Planning. Schenkman Publish Co. Inc. Cambridge, Mass. 1969.
(50) Riley, J. W., Riley, Jr. M. W., “Sociology: an approach to human communication”. in
Budd, R. W. and Ruben, B. D. Approach to Human Communication. Hayden Book Company Inc. P356-382. 1972.
(51) Rogers, E., M., Diffusion of Innovations. N. Y.: The Free Press of Glencee. 1962.
(52) Rogers, E. M., Communication Strategies for Family Planning. The Free Press. a division of Macmillan Publishing Co. Inc. P26. 1973.
(53) Rogers., E. M. and Shoemaker, F. F.: Communication of Innovations. N. Y.: The Free Press. 1971.
(54) Rogers, E. M. and Bhowmik, D. K., “Homophily-hetrophily : relational concepts for communication research”, Public Opinion Quarterly. 34( winter) :523- 538. 1970-71.
(55) Rogers, E. M. Modernization Among Peasants: The Impact of Communication. Holt. Rinehart and Winton, Inc. 1969.
(56) Rosario, F. Z. “The leader in family planning and the two-step flow model”, Journalism Quarterly, summer, P295. 1971.
(57) Schramm, W., Men, Messages and Media: A Look at Human Communication. Harper Row. 1973.
(58) Schramm, W., Communication in Family Planning. New York. Population, Council, Reports on Population/Planning. 1971.
(59) Simmons, G. B. (1969); Palmore, J. A., Lin, W. T. and Duff, R. W. (1971); Lam, P. (1969); Seidman, D. R. (1970); Balakrishman, T. R., Matthai R. J. (1966); Dubey, D. C. and Choldin, H. M. (1967), all authors’ research papers digested in Rogers, E. M.: Communication Strategies for Family Planning. The Free Press. 1973.
(60) Stycos, J. M. “The potential role of Turkish village opinion leaders in a program of family planning”, Public Opinion Quarterly, Spring, P126. 1965.
(61) Stycos, J. M. “Patterns of communication in a rural Greek Villiage ”, Public Opinion Quarterly, 16:59-70. 1972.
(62) Thaibaut, J. “An experimental study of the cohesiveness of underprivileged groups”. Human Relations. 3:251-278. 1950.
(63) Van den Ban, A. W. “A revision of the two- step flow of communication hypothesis”. Gazette. 10:237-250. 1964.
(64) Van den Ban, A. W. “Interpersonal communication and the diffusion of innovations”, Sociologia Ruralis, Journal of the European society for Rural Sociology, 10, No. 3, 1970.
(65) Yeb, Chii-Jeng. “A method of measuring structural patterns of dyadic interpersonal interaction”, Published in National Chengchi University Journal. 30. Taiwan, 1974.
(66) Yeh, Chii-Jeng. “Structure of information flow in two Taiwan villiages”, Columbia: University of Missouri, unpublished Ph. D. dissertation. 1973.