| 研究生: |
李麗鳳 Li, Li Feng |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
論傅敖斯<<大法師>>的文本、性別與主體 The aporia of nicholas urfe: individuality, sexuality and textuality in John Fowles's The Magus |
| 指導教授: |
陳長房
Chen, Chang-Fang |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
外國語文學院 - 英國語文學系 Department of English |
| 論文出版年: | 1996 |
| 畢業學年度: | 83 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 105 |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:246 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本篇論文旨在研究約翰‧傅敖斯在《大法師》中如何揭櫫現實的概念。傅氏認為現實不是中立、客觀或自我浮現的,而是經由人為形塑建構而成的。他一面改寫傳統「探索」主題以彰顯人類對現實的自我概念的建構模式,一面則利用後設小說技巧勾勒人類對現實的詮釋建構所蘊涵的虛構特質,一如小說的虛擬世界是由語言文字構設而出。因此,意義是武斷的,而真理是相對且多樣繁頤,隨時空情境的不同而改變。
本論文共分三章。第一章討論小說主角在追尋自我和統一的秩序的過程中所遭遇的困難,說明自我非本質的顯現:而真正的現實也無內涵恆常的秩序。第二章針對主角的性別認同深入剖析傳統父權論述的思考模式如何限制意義的多樣和差異。第三章討論小說在形式上的自我指涉特性使得小說本身成為一開放文本,打破視作者為意義唯一來源的權威,並且賦予讀者相對的自由,變成為意義的挪用/(再)生產者。
This study of John Fowles’s The Mequs explores and analyzes the novel’s presentation of reality as something not pre-given or self-present but as a textual construct.
Fowles rewrites the traditional narrative of quest motif and adopts metafictional devices to reveal the artificial of textual construction of reality and self. identity-He sets up a parallel between the act of reading and the act of living, which both require a variety of interpretations.
The study is composed of three chapters. Chapter I discusses the difficulty involved in the protagonist’s search for a unified self and a non-contradictory perception to the world. Chapter II deals with his sexual identity which exposes a rigid, totalizing structure of patriarchal thought that oppresses and limits the multiplicity and difference of reality as embodied in the women in the godgame. Chapter III probes into the novel’s formal self-reflexivity and Fowles’s endeavor to liberate the reader from the absolute authority of the author-God, thereby providing him with the “relative freedom” to become his own master in the appropriation or reproduction of meaning.
Acknowledgements..........iii
Chinese Abstract..........v
English Abstract..........vi
Introduction..........1
Chapter I Individuality..........8
A.Surface Model of Characterization..........11
B.Nicholas as a Modern Everyman..........14
C.The alienating Effects of Role.Playing..........22
Chapter II Sexuality..........35
A.Feminine sexuality..........35
B.Critique of Male Sex and Narcissism..........43
C.The Godgame as a Feminist Text..........55
Chapter III Textuality..........62
A.Mise en abyme..........64
B.Intertextualty..........75
C.Textual Jouissance..........82
Conclusion..........89
Works Cited..........93
Works Cited
Althusser, Louis. "Ideology and Ideological state
Apparatuses." Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays.
Trans. Ben Brewster. New York: Monthly Review, 1971.
127-86.
Aubrey, James R. John Fowles: A Reference Companion. New
York: Greenwood, 1991.
Bakhtin, M. M. The Dialogic Imagination. Ed. Michael
Holoquist. Trans. Grayl Emerson and Michael Holoquist.
Austin: Texas UP, 1981.
Barnum, Carol M. "An Interview with John Fowles." Modern
Fiction Studies 31.1 (1985): 187-203.
Barthes, Roland. “The Death of the Author." Image-MusicText.
Trans. Stephen Heath. London: Collins, 1977,142-48.
______,The Pleasure of the Text. Trans. Richard Miller. New
York: Noonday, 1975.
______,S/Z, Trans. Richard Miller. New York: Hill & Wang,1974.
Belsy, Catherine. Critical Practice. London and New York:
Metheun, 1980.
Berets, Ralph. "The Magus: A study in the Creation of a
Personal Myth.11 Twentieth Century Literature 19
(1973): 89-98.
Bergonzi, Bernard. “The Magus. 11 The situation of the
Novel. London: Macmillan, 1979.
Binns, Ronald. "John Fowles: Radical Romancer." critical
Quarterly 15 (1973): 317-34.
Cacaturimus. "The Magus. II Minnesota Rev iew 6.3 (1969)
259.
campbell, James. IIAn Interview with John Fowles.”
contemporary Literature 17.4 (1976): 455-69.
Cixous, Helene. "sorties." Modern Criticism and Theory: A
Reader. Ed. David Lodge. London and New York:
Longman , 1988. 286 - 93 .
Conradi, Peter. John Fowles. New York: Metheun, 1983.
Cooper, Pamela. The Fictions of John Fowles. ottawa Up,
1991.
Culler, Jonathan. "Jacques Derrida." structuralism and
since. Ed. John sturrock. New York: Oxford UP, 1979.154-80.
Dallenbach, Lucien. The Mirror in the Text. Trans. Jeremy
Whiteley & Emma Hughes. Cambridge: Polity, 1989.
Dixon, Ronald Craig. Whole Sight: Process in the Fiction of
John Fowles. Diss. New York state U, 1983. Ann
Arbor: UMI, 1994. 8321236.
Epstein, Joseph. "Collecting John FmoJles." Holiday 39
(1969): 124.
Felman, Shoshana. "Turning the Screw of Interpretation."
Literature and Psychoanalysis: The Question of
Reading: Otherwise. Ed. Shoshana Felman. Baltimore
and London: Johns Hopkins UP, 1982. 94-207.
Forster, E. M. Aspects of the Novel. Harmondsworth:
Penguin, 1963.
Foucault, Michel. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and
other Writings. Eds. Colin Gordon, Leo Marshall, John
Mepham, & Kate Soper. New York: Pantheon, 1980.
______,"A Preface to Transgression." Language, Counter memory,
Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews. Ed.
Donald F. Bouchard . Trans. Donald F. Bouchard and
Sherry Simon. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1977. 29-52.
Fowles, John. The Aristos. Rev. ed. London: Picador,1993.
______,The French Lieutenant's Woman. New York: Penguin,
1970.
______,The Magus: A Revised Version. London: Picador,
1988.
______,"Notes on an Unf inished Novel.” The Novel Today. Ed.
M. Bradbury. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1977. 136-50.
Hawthorn, Jeremy. A Concise Glossary of contemporary
Literary Theory. London: Edward Arnold, 1992.
Harvey, David. The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford:
Blackwell, 1991.
Heath, Stephen. Translator'S Note to Roland Barthes, Image Music-
Text. New York: Hill & Wang, 1977. 7-1l.
Holmes, Frederick M. "Art, Truth, and John Fowles's The
Magus." Modern Fiction Studies 31.1 (1985): 45-56.
Jameson, Fredric. Postmodernism or, the Cultural Logic of
Late capitalism. Durham: Duke UP, 1991.
Jones, Ann Rosalind. IIInscribing Femininity: French
Theories of the Feminine. “Making a Difference:
Feminist Literary criticism. Eds. Gayle Greene and
Coppelia Kahn. London: Routledge, 1985. 80-112.
Kristeva, Julia. Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to
Literature and Art. Ed. Leon S. Roudiez. Trans.
Thomas Gora, Alice Jardin, and Leon S. Roudiez.
Oxford: Blackwell, 1980.
Loveday, Simon. The Romances of John Fowles. London:
Macmillan, 1985.
Moi, Toril. Sexual/Textual Politics: Feminist Literary
Theory. London and New York: Routledge, 1985.
Nadeau, Robert L. “ Fowles and Physics: A Study of The
Magus: A Revised Version." Journal of Modern
Literature 8 (1980-1): 261-74.
Palmer, William J. "John Fowles and the crickets." Modern
Fiction Studies 31.1 (1985): 3-13.
Pifer, Ellen. Introduction. critical Essays on John
Fowles. Ed. Ellen Pifer. Boston: G. K. Hall, 1986.
1-18.
Rackham, Jeff. "John Fowles: The Existential Labyrinth."
critigue 13. J (1972): 89-10J.
Robinson, Robert. "Giving the Reader a Choice--A
Conversation with John Fowles. II The Listener 31
(1975): J28-39.
Rubenstein, Roberta. "Myth, Mystery, and Irony: John
Fow les' s The Magus. II Contemporary Literature 16
(1975): 328-39.
Salami, Mahmound. John Fowles's Fiction and the Poetics of
Postmodernism. London: Associated UP, 1992.
Selden, Raman. A Reader's Guide to Contemporary Literary
Theory. Sussex: Harvester, 1985.
Siegle, Robert. The Politics of Reflexivity: Narrative and
Constitutive Poetics of Culture. Baltimore and London:
Johns Hopkins UP, 1986.
"Spidery Spirit." Time. 14 Jan . 1969: 92-93.
Tong, Rosemarie. Feminist Thought. Boulder and San
Francisco: westview, 1989.
Waugh, Patricia. Feminine Fictions. New York: Routledge,
1989.
______,Metafiction: The Theory and Practice of Self-Conscious
Fiction. London and New York: Metheun, 1984.
Webster, Roger. Studying Literary Theory: An Introduction.
London: Edward Arnbld, 1990.
Woodcock, Bruce. Male Mythologies. Sussex: Harvester,1984.
(限達賢圖書館四樓資訊教室A單機使用)