跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表
研究生： 郭婷雅
Augustin Ludnear Diane
論文名稱： 微觀管理對員工生產力的影響：千禧世代與Z世代之比較分析
The Impact of Micromanagement on Employee Productivity: A comparative Analysis of Millennials and Generation Z
指導教授： 何富年
Foo Nin Ho
口試委員: 蘇威傑
Wei-Chieh Su
冷則剛
Tse-Keng Leng
學位類別： 碩士
Master
系所名稱： 商學院 - 國際經營管理英語碩士學位學程(IMBA)
International MBA Program College of Commerce(IMBA)
論文出版年： 2026
畢業學年度： 114
語文別： 英文
論文頁數： 71
外文關鍵詞： Micromanagement, Employee Productivity, Autonomy, Leadership, Organizational Behavior
相關次數： 點閱：60  下載：0 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

    • This study examined the relationship between perceived micromanagement and employee productivity, as well as the moderating role of generational group in this relationship. Drawing on leadership and organizational behavior literature, the study investigated whether excessive managerial control and close supervision negatively influence employees’ self-reported productivity and whether this relationship differs between Millennials and Generation Z employees. The findings revealed that perceived micromanagement did not significantly predict employee productivity. In addition, the generational group did not significantly moderate the relationship between micromanagement and employee productivity. Consequently, the hypotheses were not supported. However, the study identified a moderate and statistically significant negative relationship between micromanagement and employee autonomy, suggesting that employees who experienced higher levels of managerial control tended to report lower levels of workplace autonomy. The study contributes to the existing literature by examining micromanagement within a generational framework and by highlighting the importance of autonomy and contextual workplace factors in understanding employees’ responses to managerial behavior.

    Chapter 1. Introduction 1
    1.1. Background of the Study 1
    1.2. Research Problem 2
    1.3. Research Objectives 3
    1.4. Research Questions 3
    1.5. Significance of the Study 3
    1.6. Organization of the Thesis 3
    Chapter 2. Conceptual Framework & Literature Review 5
    2.1. Micromanagement as a Leadership Style 5
    2.2. Cultural Context and the Perception of Managerial Behavior 9
    2.3. Employee Productivity in Organizational Research 10
    2.4. Age and Work Behavior 11
    2.5. Review of Empirical Literature 12
    2.6. Generational group as a moderating variable in Leadership research 13
    2.7. Conceptual Framework 13
    2.8. Hypotheses Development 15
    Chapter 3. Methodology 16
    3.1. Research Design 16
    3.2. Sample and Data Collection 16
    3.3. Measurement Model 17
    3.4. Data Analysis Plan 18
    3.5. Ethical Considerations 19
    Chapter 4. Results 20
    4.1. Sample Characteristics 20
    4.2. Descriptive Statistics of Main Variables 24
    4.3. Reliability Analysis 25
    4.4. Correlation Analysis 26
    4.4.1. Independent Samples T-Test 28
    4.5. Regression Analysis 29
    4.5.1. Hierarchical regression analysis 29
    Chapter 5. Discussion 34
    5.1. Interpretation of the Findings 34
    5.2. Comparison with Previous Literature 36
    5.3. Practical Implications 39
    5.4. Limitations of the Study 40
    5.5. Recommendation for Future Research 41
    Chapter 6. Conclusion 43
    References 45
    Appendices 48
    Appendix A- Questionnaire 48
    Appendix B - Variable Codebook 55
    Appendix C - Reliability Outputs 63
    Appendix D - Correlation Outputs 65
    Appendix E: Regression Outputs- ANOVA 71

    Bwalya, A.R. (2024). Micromanagement: A comprehensive analysis: Global Scientific Journals.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382067762_MICROMANAGEMENT_A_COMPREHENSIVE_ANALYSIS

    Chambers, H.E (2009). My way or the highway: The micromanagement survival guide. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Costanza, D.P., Badger, J.M., R.L., Severt, J.B., & Gade, P.A. (2012). Generational differences in work-related attitudes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(4), 375-394.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257584336_Generational_Differences_in_Work-Related_Attitudes_A_Meta-analysis

    Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
    https://selfdeterminationtheory.org/SDT/documents/2000_DeciRyan_PIWhatWhy.pdf

    Fang, T., & Liu, F. (2022). A review on perfectionism. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 10(1), 297-305.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358091361_A_Review_on_Perfectionism

    Hackman, J.R., & Oldham, G.R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250-279.
    https://web.mit.edu/curhan/www/docs/Articles/15341_Readings/Group_Performance/Hackman_et_al_1976_Motivation_thru_the_design_of_work.pdf

    Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage Publications.

    Kooij, D.T.A.M., De Lange, A. H., Jansen, P.G.W., & Kanfer, R. (2011). Age and work-related motives: Results of a meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(2), 197-225.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227662873_Age_and_work-related_motives_Results_of_a_meta-analysis

    Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., de Vet, H. C. W., & van der Beek, A. J. (2014). Construct validity of the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 56(3), 331–337.
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24561507/

    Manzoni, J.-F., & Barsoux, J.-L. (1998). The set-up-to-fail syndrome. Harvard Business School Press.
    https://hbr.org/1998/03/the-set-up-to-fail-syndrome

    McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. McGraw-Hill.

    Meyer, E. (2014). The culture map: Breaking through the invisible boundaries of global business. PublicAffairs.

    Ng, T.W.H., & Feldman, D.C. (2010). The relationships of age with job attitudes: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 63(3), 677-718.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/211391936_The_relationships_of_age_with_job_attitudes_A_meta-analysis

    Oxford English Dictionary. (n.d.). Micromanagement. Oxford University Press. Retrieved June 2, 2026, from Oxford English Dictionary .

    Pritchard, R. D., Harrell, M. M., Diaz Granados, D., & Guzman, M. J. (2008). The productivity measurement and enhancement system: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 540-567.
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5396369_The_Productivity_Measurement_and_Enhancement_System_A_Meta-Analysis

    Serrat, O. (2011). The travails of micromanagement. Asian Development Bank.
    https://www.academia.edu/9419674/The_Travails_of_Micromanagement

    Simons, R. (1995). Levers of control: How managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renewal. Harvard Business School Press.

    Smith, A. (1776/2007). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. MetaLibri.

    White, R.D. (2010). The micromanagement disease: Symptoms, diagnosis, and cure. Public Personnel Management, 39(1), 71-76.
    https://paclac.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Micromanagement-Disease.pdf

    QR CODE
    :::