跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 吳嘉容
Wu, Jia-rong
論文名稱: 圖像輔助呈現時機對台灣國中生聽力之影響
The Effects of Pictures at Different Time Periods on the Listening Comprehension of Junior High School Students in Taiwan
指導教授: 林啟一
Lin, Chi-yee
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 外國語文學院 - 英語教學碩士在職專班
The Master of Arts in English Teaching
論文出版年: 2004
畢業學年度: 92
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 115
中文關鍵詞: 圖像輔助圖像式英語聽力理解測驗圖片呈現之時
外文關鍵詞: visual aids, listening comprehension test with picture format, pictures at different time periods
相關次數: 點閱:127下載:133
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討圖像輔助呈現時機對台灣國中生聽力的影響,而圖像輔助呈現時機則分為在聽力活動前與在聽力活動進行中。同時為了深入探究其效益,本研究更著重於其對高、中、低三個不同能力組別學生的影響。除此之外,並對於二份學生問卷的回答加以探討:
    (1)問卷一有關學生們先前學習英語的背景資料。
    (2)問卷一有關學生們在聽力過程中主要遭遇的問題,涵蓋聽力內容、聽者本身與外在因素等。
    (3)問卷二有關學生們對圖像式聽力測驗的反應與他們對實施聽力測驗時,圖片展示時間的看法。
    本研究以台中縣光正國中一個國三班級42位同學為對象,經過英語聽力能力測驗後,他們被分為高中低三組。實驗前,學生們先填寫第一份問卷。隨後,三組學生一起接受兩種實驗: (1)邊聽邊看圖片; (2)先展示圖片再聽。在完成所有實驗後,隨即填寫第二份問卷。本研究主要結果如下:
    (1)大多數的受試者已學習英語3年以上,卻對自己的聽力缺乏信心。此現象乃肇因於學生們有限的練習時間。也因此,他們大多不贊成將來升高中大考有聽力測驗的項目。另外,眾多的學生表達了希望獲得老師在聽力方面指導的強烈需求。
    (2)聽力能力愈差的學生,遇到更多的聽力問題,尤其在聽力內容與聽者本身方面問題為最。
    (3)以整體學生的聽力表現而言,聽前呈現圖片對學生的幫助比邊聽邊呈現圖片的效果來的顯著。
    (4)以各個組別學生的聽力表現而言,聽前呈現圖片最能彌補中低程度學生聽力的不足。
    (5)超過半數以上的學生表達較喜愛圖像式的英語聽力測驗,尤其是圖像呈現在正式的聽力活動之前為最。
    根據研究的結果,聽前呈現圖像輔助對不同程度的學生均有助益,尤其對中低程度者聽力理解的幫助更為顯著。因此,本論文呼籲,國中英語老師可在實施英語聽力測驗時,多善用圖像輔助以引發學生的學習動機並藉由聽前呈現圖片技巧來提昇學生們的英語聽力理解。


    The purpose of the present study is to explore the effects of pictures as cues supplied at different time periods, the picture before listening comprehension test (BLCT) and during listening comprehension test (DLCT). More specific, it is focused on the comparisons of the effects of BLCT and DLCT on the high, middle and low proficiency groups. Also probed are students’responses to two questionnaires on the following issues.
    (1) The subjects’ previous English learning background as shown in Questionnaire One;
    (2) The main listening problems the subjects encounter in the process of listening, including the oral text, the listener and external aspects;
    (3) The subjects reactions to the listening comprehension with the picture format and their preference for the timing of picture-giving.
    The subjects of this study are 42 students of nine-grade junior high school students in Kuang-cheng Junior High School in Taichung County. They are divided into three proficiency groups—the high proficiency group (HPG), the intermediate proficiency group (MPG) and the low proficiency group (LPG) according to the scores of the listening comprehension test in the subjects’ second mid-term examination. At the beginning of the overall experiment, they are demanded to finish Questionnaire One. After that, they are assigned to take two listening comprehension tests: a listening comprehension test with a picture before listening and during listening. After receiving the two treatments, the subjects are asked to complete Questionnaire Two to reveal their attitudes toward the listening comprehension tests with visual cues.
    The major findings of the present study are summarized as follows:
    (1) Although most of the subjects have learned English for more than three years, they do not establish much confidence in their own listening ability due to the limited time of practice in listening. Many of them do not support the idea of incorporating the listening comprehension test into the future high school entrance exam. However, they express their eagerness for obtaining the teacher’s guidance in listening.
    (2) The worse the listeners achieve, the more listening difficulties they would come across, especially in the oral text and the listener himself/herself.
    (3) BLCT is more effective than DLCT. This can be proved by the mean scores and standard deviation of BLCT and DLCT respectively.
    (4) As the three different proficiency groups are taken into consideration, BLCT lends itself to the low proficiency groups (LPG) and the intermediate proficiency groups (MPG).
    (5) Most of the subjects prefer the listening comprehension test with the picture format, particularly the visual cue before the listening activity.
    Based on the results of the study, the picture before listening benefits all of the three proficiency groups, especially the lower achievers. The researcher suggests that English teachers in junior high school try to make good use of visual cues in constructing listening comprehension tests to arouse students’ motivation and thus improve students’ listening comprehension.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.....................iii
    TABLE OF CONTENTS....................iv
    LIST OF TABLES.......................viii
    LIST OF FIGURES......................x
    CHINESE ABSTRUCT.....................xi
    ENGLISH ABSTRUCT.....................xiii
    CHAPTER
    1. INTRODUCTION......................1
    1.1 Motivation.......................1
    1.2 Purpose of the Study.............6
    1.3 Significance of the Study........6
    1.4 Research Questions of the Study..7
    2. LITERATURE REVIEW
    2.1 The Importance of Listening in
    Language Learning................10
    2.2 Nature of Listening..............13
    2.3 The Difficulties in Listening
    Comprehension....................16
    2.3.1 Factors Affecting Listening
    Comprehension....................17
    2.3.1.1 Speaker Factors..............17
    2.3.1.1.1 Speech Rate................18
    2.3.1.1.2 Accent.....................19
    2.3.1.1.3 Pause......................19
    2.3.1.1.4 Intonation.................20
    2.3.1.1.5 Redundancy.................20
    2.3.1.2 Oral Text Factors............21
    2.3.1.2.1 Complexity of the Lexis and
    Syntax.....................22
    2.3.1.2.2 Topic Familiarity..........22
    2.3.1.2.3 Discourse Signals..........22
    2.3.1.2.4 Word Familiarity...........23
    2.3.1.2.5 Level of Difficulty........23
    2.3.1.3 Listener Factors.............23
    2.3.1.3.1 Background Knowledge.......24
    2.3.1.3.1.1 Schema-Theoretic
    Perspectives on
    comprehension............25
    2.3.1.3.1.1.1 Definitions of Schema..25
    2.3.1.3.1.1.2 Functions of Schemata
    in Comprehension.......27
    2.3.1.3.2 Motivation.................32
    2.3.1.3.3 Attention..................33
    2.3.1.3.4 Anxiety....................34
    2.4 Visual Aids in Listening
    Comprehension....................35
    2.4.1 The Advantages of Picture
    Format in Listening
    Comprehension..................35
    2.4.2 The Principles of Using Visual
    Aids...........................39
    2.4.3 The Advantages of Visual-Before
    Treatment in Listening
    Comprehension..................40
    3. METHODOLOGY.......................42
    3.1 Subjects.........................42
    3.2 Instruments......................44
    3.2.1 Questionnaires.................44
    3.2.2 Listening Comprehension
    Tests..........................45
    3.2.2.1 Oral Texts...................45
    3.2.2.2 Visual Aids..................46
    3.2.2.3 Listening Comprehension
    Questions....................47
    3.3 The Pilot Study..................48
    3.4 Procedures.......................49
    3.5 Data Analysis....................52
    4. RESULTS AND DISSCUSSION...........54
    4.1 Subjects’Former Listening
    Experience.......................54
    4.1.1 Subjects’ Learning English
    Background.....................54
    4.1.2 Subjects’ Listening Time......56
    4.1.3 Subjects’ Language Competence
    in the Four Language Skills....57
    4.1.4 Subjects’Listening Strategies.58
    4.1.5 Subjects’Replies to Listening
    Guidance.......................60
    4.1.6 Subjects’ Responses to the
    English Listening Comprehension
    Test Being Incorporated into
    the Joint High School Entrance
    Exam..........................62
    4.2 Dominant Listening Comprehension
    Difficulties of Various
    Proficiency Groups..............63
    4.2.1 Listening Comprehension
    Problems in Oral Texts........63
    4.2.2 Listening Comprehension
    Problems in Listeners.........67
    4.2.3 Listening Comprehension
    Problems in External Factors..69
    4.3 Effects of Picture Format During
    Listening Comprehension Test and
    Before Listening Comprehension
    Test on the Subjects............71
    4.4 Comparisons of the Effects of
    Two Strategies on the Subjects
    at Different Proficiency Levels.73
    4.5 Subjects’ Responses to the
    Listening Comprehension with
    Picture Format..................75
    4.5.1 Subjects’ Responses to the
    Visual Aids.....................76
    4.5.2 Subjects’ Responses to the
    Visual Aids at different Time
    Periods.......................79
    5. CONCLUSIONS......................81
    5.1 Summary of the Findings.........81
    5.2 Pedagogical Implications........83
    5.3 Suggestions for Future Research.85
    APPENDIX A Division of English
    Proficiency Groups..................86
    APPENDIX B Questionnaire One.......90
    APPENDIX C Questionnaire Two.......93
    APPENDIX D Listening Comprehension
    Tests...............................95
    REFERENCES..........................103

    Abbott, G., & Wingard, P. (1981). The teaching of
    English as an international language: A
    practical guide. London: Collins.
    Adam, M. J., & Collins, A. (1979). A schema-
    theoretic view of reading. In R. O. Freedle
    (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing
    (pp. 1-22). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing
    Corporation.
    Anderson, A., & Lynch, T. (1988). Listening.
    Oxford:Oxford University Press.
    Anderson, J. R. (1990). Cognitive psychology and
    its implication (3 rd ed.). New York: W.H.
    Freeman.
    Arnold, J. (2000). Seeing through listening
    comprehension exam anxiety. TESOL Quarterly,
    34, 777-786.
    Bacon, S. M. (1989). Listening for real in the
    foreign language classroom. Foreign Language
    Annals, 22, 543-551.
    Bailey, K. M. (1998). Learning about Language
    Assessment: Dilemmas, decisions, and
    Directions. New York: Heinle & Heinle.
    Baltova, I. (1994). The impact of video on the
    comprehension skills of core French students.
    The Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 507-531.
    Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in
    Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge:
    Cambridge University Press.
    Belasco, S. (1981). Aital cal aprene las lengas
    estrangieras, Comprehension: The key to second
    -language acquisition. In H. Winitz (Ed.), The
    comprehension approach to foreign language
    instruction (pp. 14-33). Cambridge, MA: Newbury
    House.
    Bernhardt, E., & James, C. (1987). The teaching and
    testing of comprehension in foreign language
    learning. In D.W. Birckbichler (Ed.), Proficiency,
    policy, and professionalism in foreign language
    education (pp. 65-81). Lincolnwood, IL: National
    Textbook Company.
    Blau, E. K. (1990). The effect of syntax, speed,
    and pauses on listening comprehension. TESOL
    Quarterly, 24(4), 746-752.
    Boyle, J. P. (1984). Factors affecting listening
    comprehension. ELT Journal, 38(1), 34-38.
    Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M.K. (1972).
    Contextual prerequisites for understanding:
    Some investigations of comprehension and
    recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal
    Behavior, 11(6), 717-726.
    Braxton, M. A. (1999). Adult ESL learning
    strategies: Case studies of preferred learning
    styles and perceived cultural influences in
    academic listening tasks. Dissertation Abstract
    International, 60(02), 312A. (University
    Microfilms No. AAT9919844)
    Brindley, G. (1998). Assessing listening abilities.
    Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18,
    171-191.
    Brown, G. (1978). Understanding spoken language.
    TESOL Quarterly, 12(3), 271-284.
    Brown, G. (1987). Twenty-five years of teaching
    listening comprehension. English Teaching Forum,
    25, 11-15.
    Brown, G. (1990). Listening to spoken English. New
    York: Longman.
    Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Teaching the spoken
    language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Buck, G. (1991). The testing of listening
    comprehension: An introspective study. Language
    Testing, 8, 67-91.
    Burley-Allen, M. (1982). Listening: The forgotten
    skill. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    Byrnes, H. (1984). The role of listening
    comprehension: A theoretical base. Foreign
    Language Annals, 17(4), 317-329.
    Call, M. E. (1985). Auditory short-term memory
    listening comprehension and the input hypothesis.
    TESOL Quarterly, 19(4), 765-781.
    Carrell, P. L. (1983). Three components of background
    knowledge in reading comprehension. Language
    Learning, 33, 183-207.
    Carrell, P. L., & Eisterhold, J. C. (1983). Schema
    theory and ESL reading pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly,
    17(4), 553-573.
    Carroll, D.W. (1999). Psychology of language (3rd
    ed.). New York: Books/ Cole Publishing Company.
    Carroll, J. B. (1962). The prediction of success in
    intensive foreign language training. In R.
    Glaser (Ed.), Training research and education
    (pp. 87-136). Pittsburgh: The University of
    Pittsburgh Press.
    Carroll, J. B. (1971). Learning from verbal
    discourse in educational media: A review of the
    literature. Prentice, NJ: Educational Testing
    Service.
    Chan, L. S., & Li, H. R. (1990). 國中英語聽力測驗
    3全。 台北:康軒文教事業。
    Chastain, K. (1976). Developing second-language
    skills: Theory to practice (2nd ed.). Chicago:
    Rand McNally College Publishing Company.
    Chaudron, C., & Richards, J. C. (1986). The effect
    of discourse markers on the comprehension of
    lectures. Applied Linguistics, 7, 113-127.
    Chiang, C. S., & Dunkel, P. (1992). The effect of
    speech modification, prior knowledge and
    listening proficiency on EFL lecture learning.
    TESOL Quarterly, 26(2), 345-374.
    Clark, H. H., & Clark, E. V. (1977). Psychology
    and language: An introduction to
    psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace
    Jovanovich, Inc.
    Cohen, A.D. (1990). Language learning: Insights for
    learners, teachers, and researchers. New York:
    Newbury House / Harper & Row.
    Conner, U. (1984). Recall of text: Differences
    between first and second language readers. TESOL
    Quarterly, 18(2), 239-256.
    Corria, I. L. (1999). Motivating EFL learners. Forum
    , 37(2), 17.
    Derwing, T., & Munro, M. J. (2001). What speaking
    rates do non-native listeners prefer? Applied
    Linguistics, 22(3), 324-337.
    Dunkel, P. (1986). Developing listening fluency in
    L2: Theoretical principles and pedagogical
    considerations. Modern Language Journal, 70(2),
    99-106.
    Dunkel, P. (1991). Listening in the native and
    second / foreign language: Toward an
    integration of research and practice. TESOL
    Quarterly, 25(3), 431-457.
    Dunkel, P., Henning, G., & Chaudron, C. (1993).
    The assessment of a listening comprehension
    construct: A tentative model for test
    specifications and development. Modern Language,
    77, 180-191.
    Faerch, C., & Kasper, G. (1986). The role of
    comprehension in second-language learning.
    Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 247-257.
    Fan, Y. (1993). Listening: Problems and solutions.
    English Teaching Forum, 31(1), 16-19.
    Feyten, C. M. (1991). The power of listening
    ability: An overlooked dimension in language
    acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 75, 173-180.
    Flaherty, S. E. (1979). Rate-controlled speech in
    foreign language education. Foreign Language
    Annals, 12, 275-280.
    Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second
    language learning: The role of attitudes and
    motivation. London: Edward Arnold Publishers.
    Gardner, R. C., Lalande, R. N., Moorcroft, R., & Evers
    , F. T. (1987). Second language attrition: The role
    of motivation and use. Journal of Language and Social
    Psychology, 6(1), 29-47.
    Ginther, A. (2002). Context and content visuals and
    performance on listening comprehension stimuli.
    Language Testing, 19(2), 133-167.
    Goodman, K. S. (1967). Reading: A psycholinguistic
    guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist,
    6(1), 126-135.
    Goodman, K. S. (1968). The psycholinguistic nature
    of the reading process. Detroit: Wayne State
    University Press.
    Goss, B. (1982). Listening as information processing.
    Communication Quarterly, 30(4), 304-307.
    Griffith, R. (1990). Speech rate and NNS comprehension:
    A preliminary study in time-benefit analysis.
    Language Learning, 40(3), 311-336.
    Griffiths, R. (1992). Speech rate and listening
    comprehension: further evidence of the
    relationship. TESOL Quarterly, 26(2), 385-391.
    Harmer, J. (1998). How to teach English. England:
    Longman.
    Hughes, A. (1989). Testing for language teachers.
    Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Hung, F. S. (1998). Word familiarity and content
    schemata in EFL listening comprehension.
    Studies in English Language and Literature,
    4, 45-62.
    Hyltenstam, K., & Pienemann, M. (Eds.). (1985).
    A role for instruction in second language
    acquisition: Task-based language training.
    Modelling and assessing second language
    acquisition, Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    Jacobs, G. et al. (1988). The effects of pausing
    on listening comprehension. Paper, Second
    Language Research Forum, Honolulu, Hawaii,
    March.
    Joiner, E. G. (1984). Listening from the inside
    out. Foreign Language Annals,17(4), 335-338.
    Joiner, E. (1986). Listening in the foreign
    language. In B.H. Wing (Ed.), Listening,
    reading and writing: Analysis and application
    (pp. 43-70). Middlebury, VT: Northeast
    Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.
    Kang, S. (1995). The effects of a context-embedded
    approach to second-language vocabulary learning.
    System, 23, 143-155.
    Kelly, P. (1991). Lexical ignorance: The main obstacle
    to listening comprehension with advanced FL
    learners. IRAL, 29(2), 135-150.
    King, P. E., & Behnke, R. R. (1989). The effect of
    time-compressed speech on comprehensive,
    interpretive, and short-term listening. Human
    Communication Research, 15, 428-441.
    Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in
    second language acquisition. Elmsford, NY:
    Pergamon Press.
    Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. D. (1983). The natural
    approach: Language acquisition in the classroom.
    New York: Longman.
    Lin, S. H. (2000). A study of English listening
    comprehension strategies used by senior high
    school students in Taiwan. Master’s Thesis,
    National Kaohsiung Normal University, Taiwan.
    Long, D. (1989). Second language listening
    comprehension: A schema-theoretic perspective.
    Modern Language Journal, 73, 32-41.
    Long, D. R. (1990). What you don’t know can't help
    you: An exploratory study of background
    knowledge and second language listening
    comprehension. Studies in Second Language
    Acquisition, 12(1), 65-80.
    Long, D. R., & Macian, J. L. (1994). Listening
    skills: Acquisition and assessment. Northeast
    Conference Reports, 111-138.
    Long, M. (1985). Input and second language
    acquisition theory. In S. Gass & C. Madden
    (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition
    (pp. 337-393). Rowley: MA: Newbury House.
    Long, M. H. (1983). Linguistic and conversational
    adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies
    in Second Language Acquisition, 5, 177-193.
    Lynch, A. (1988). Grading foreign listening
    comprehension materials: The use of naturally
    modified interaction. Doctoral dissertation.
    Edinburgh University.
    Lynch, T. (1983). Study listening. New York:
    Cambridge University Press.
    MacWilliam, I. (1986). Video and language
    comprehension. ELT Journal, 40, 131-135.
    Mendelsohn, D. J. (1998). Teaching listening.
    Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18,
    81-101.
    Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing
    knowledge. In P. H. Winston (Ed.), The
    psychology of computer vision (pp. 211-277).
    New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Morley, J. (1991). Listening comprehension in
    second/foreign language instruction. In M.
    Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a
    second or foreign language (pp. 81-106).
    New York: Newbury House.
    Mueller, G. A. (1980). Visual contextual cues
    and listening comprehension: An experiment.
    Modern Language Journal, 64, 335-340.
    Munro, M. J. & Derwing, T. M. (1998). The effects
    of speaking rate on listener evaluation of
    native and foreign-accented speech. Language
    Learning, 48(2), 159-182.
    Nelson, C. H. (1989). Drawing activities as a tool
    for language learning. Forum, 27(3), 33.
    Nord, J. R. (1980). Developing listening fluency
    before speaking: An alternative paradigm.
    System, 8(1), 1-22.
    Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology:
    A textbook for teachers. New York: Prentice
    Hall.
    Omaggio, A. C. (1979). Pictures and second
    language comprehension: Do they help?
    Foreign Language Annals, 12(2), 107-116.
    Omoggio, A. C. (1990). Teaching language in
    context: Proficiency-oriented instruction.
    Boston, MA. : Heinle & Heinle.
    Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies:
    What every teacher should know. New York:
    Newbury House/Harper & Row.
    Palij, M., & Aaronson, D. (Eds.). (1992).
    Advances in psychology. The role of language
    background in cognitive processing, New York:
    Elsevier Science Publishers.
    Phillips, E. M. (1992). The effects of language
    anxiety on students’ oral test performance
    and attitudes. The Modern Language Journal,
    76, 14-26.
    Randhawa, B. S., & Coffman, W. E. ( Eds.). (1978)
    . Visual learning, thinking, and communication.
    New York: Academic Press.
    Richards, J. C. (1983). Listening comprehension:
    Approach, design, procedure. TESOL Quarterly,
    17, 219-240.
    Rijavec, M. (1991). Using visual aids appropriately.
    Forum, 29(1), 50-51.
    Rivers, W. M. (1973). Reading for information.
    American Foreign Language Teacher, 4, 7-9.
    Rivers, W. M. (1981). Teaching foreign-language
    skills (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of
    Chicago Press.
    Rivers, W. M. (1984). What practitioners say about
    listening: Research implications for the
    classroom in R.A. Gilman and L.M. Moody. Foreign
    Language Annals, 17(4), 331-334.
    Rixon, S. (1981). The design of materials to foster
    particular listening skills. ELT Documents,
    121, 68-106.
    Rost, M. (1990). Listening in language learning.
    London and New York: Longman.
    Rost, M. (1991). Listening in Action. London:
    Prentice Hall.
    Rubin, J. (1990). (Eds.). (1990). Improving foreign
    language listening comprehension. Washington, DC:
    Georgetown University, International Research and
    Studies Program.
    Rubin, J. (1994). A review of second language
    listening comprehension research. The Modern
    Language Journal, 78(2), 199-221.
    Ruhe, V. (1996). Graphics and listening
    comprehension. TESL Canada Journal, 14(1),
    45-60.
    Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building
    blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce,
    & W. E. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in
    reading comprehension (pp. 33-58). Hillsdale, NJ:
    Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Rumelhart, D. E., & Ortony, A. (1977). The
    representation of knowledge in memory. In R. C.
    Anderson, R. J. Spiro, and W. E. Montague (Eds.),
    Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp.
    99-135). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Samuels, S. J. (1984). Factors influencing listening:
    Inside and outside the head. Theory into Practice,
    23, 183-189.
    Scarcella, R. C., & Oxford, R. L. (1992). The tapestry
    of language learning: The individual in the
    communicative classroom. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
    Schank, R. C. (1975). The structure of episodes in
    memory. In D. G. Bobrow & A. Collins (Eds.),
    Representation and understanding (pp. 237-272).
    New York: Academic.
    Schickedanz, J. A., York, M. E., Stewart, I. S., &
    White, D. (1977). Strategies for teaching young
    children. London: Prentice-Hall International, Inc.
    Schmidt-Rinehart, B. C. (1994). The effects of topic
    familiarity on second language listening
    comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 78(2),
    179-189.
    Sheils, J. (1988). Communication in the modern
    languages classroom. Strasbourg, France:
    The Council of Europe.
    Sherman, J. (1997). The effect of question preview in
    listening comprehension tests. Language Testing,
    14, 185-213.
    Shin, Y. C. (1995). Classroom listening tests. 國立北商
    專學報,45期,頁461-474。
    Sinatra, R. (1986). Visual literacy connections to
    thinking, reading and writing. Spring field: Charles
    C Thomas.
    Skrzypczynska, J. (1992). Some ways to use pictures in
    language teaching. Forum, 30(2), 42-44.
    Snyder, H. R. (1988). Foreign language acquisition and
    audio-visual aids. Foreign Language Annals, 21(4),
    343-348.
    Su, P. Ch. (1994). The effects of visual elements on
    English listening comprehension: Videotape-testing
    versus audiotape-testing. Kaohsiung Normal
    University Journal, 5, 263-287.
    Ellis, R., Tanaka, Y., & Yamazaki, A. (1994). Classroom
    interaction, comprehension and the acquisition of
    L2 word meanings. Language Learning, 44, 449-491.
    Taylor, S. E. (1964). Listening: What research says to
    the teacher. Washington, DC: National Education
    Association.
    Teng, H. C. (1997). Schema-theoretic perspectives on
    listening comprehension. Journal of Yunlin
    Institute of Technology, 6(2), 181-187.
    Teng, H. C. (1998). 聽前活動對英語聽力理解之成效探究。
    教育研究資訊, 6卷2 期,頁133-141。
    Thompson, I., & Rubin, J. (1996). Can strategy
    instruction improve listening comprehension?
    Foreign Language Annals, 29(3), 331-342.
    Tsui, A. B., & Fullilove, J. (1998). Bottom-up or top-
    down processing as a discriminator of L2 listening
    performance. Applied linguistics, 19(4), 432-451.
    Tuttle, H. G. (1975). Using visual material in the
    foreign-language classroom. Learning Resources, 2,
    9.
    Underhill, N. (1992). Testing spoken language: A
    handbook of oral testing techniques. Cambridge:
    Cambridge University Press.
    Underwood, M. (1989). Teaching listening. New York:
    Longman.
    Ur. P. (1985). Teaching listening comprehension.
    Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Vandergrift, L. (1999). Facilitating second language
    listening comprehension: Acquiring successful
    strategies. ELT Journal, 53(3), 168-176.
    Vogely, A. J. (1998). Listening comprehension
    anxiety: Students’ reported sources and solutions.
    Foreign Language Annals, 31(1), 67-75.
    Vogely, A. (1999). Addressing listening comprehension
    anxiety. In D. J. Young (Ed.), Affect in foreign
    language and second learning: A practical guide to
    creating a low-anxiety classroom atmosphere. New
    York: McGraw-Hill.
    Voss, B. (1979). Hesitation phenomena as sources of
    perceptual errors for non-native speakers. Language
    and speech, 22, 129-144.
    Wang, C. Y. (2000). Teaching and learning listening
    comprehension in the EFL classroom: Importance,
    factors, suggestions. Journal of National Taichung
    Institute of Technology, 1, 369-388.
    Winitz, H. (Ed.). (1981). The comprehension approach
    to foreign language instruction. Rowley, MA: Newbury
    House.
    Wipf, J. A. (1984). Strategies for teaching second
    language listening comprehension. Foreign Language
    Annals, 17(4), 345-348.
    Wolff, F. I., & Marsnik, N. C. (1992). Perceptive
    listening. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
    Wright, A. (1989). Pictures for language learning.
    Cambridge: Canbridge University Press.
    Wolvin, A., & Coakley, C. (1992). Listening (4th ed.).
    Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
    Yorio, C. A. (1971). Some sources of reading problems
    for foreign language learners. Language Learning,
    21, 108-109.
    Yu, C. F. (1993). The assessment of using audio and
    video tapes in a lab classroom. Soochow Journal of
    Foreign Languages and Literatures, 9, 53-76.
    Zhao, Y. (1997). The effects of listeners’ control of
    speech rate on second language comprehension.
    Applied Linguistics, 18, 49-68.

    QR CODE
    :::