| 研究生: |
張玉萍 Chang, Yu Pin |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
外顯內隱自尊的落差現象與自我設限 Discrepancies between explicit and implicit self esteem: Implication on self handicapping |
| 指導教授: |
李美枝
Li, Mei Chi |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
理學院 - 心理學系 Department of Psychology |
| 論文出版年: | 2008 |
| 畢業學年度: | 96 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 147 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 外顯自尊 、內隱自尊 、IAT 、落差現象 、自我設限 、非口語焦慮行為 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | explicit self esteem, implicit self esteem, IAT, discrepancy, self-handicapping, non-verbal behavior |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:263 下載:218 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
自我設限是指人們因為害怕失敗帶來傷害,或想要在成功時更顯得自己特別優異的方法。本研究主要探討不同類型自尊者使用不同自我設限行為的狀況。受試者接收數學能力的正向評價回饋後,即接受壓力或練習效果對測驗表現是否有影響的操弄指導語,在4組(策略暗示:宣稱、行為、宣稱與行為,控制組)實驗設計中,研究者測量所有受試者的宣稱策略使用程度、練習時間與練習題數,研究進行中亦錄影其非口語焦慮行為。研究結果有六大發現:(1)內隱自尊與外顯自尊無關,表示它們是不同的構念;(2)情境對宣稱式自我設限有主要效果:接受宣稱式自我設限會影響表現訊息的人,他們的宣稱策略使用程度明顯比無接受訊息者來得高;(3)外顯自尊與情境對行為式自我設限有交互作用效果:當暗示其練習效果會影響表現時,高外顯自尊者比低外顯自尊者有較少的練習行為,會比較容易有行為式自我設限的表現出現;(4)內隱自尊對宣稱式自我設限亦有主要效果:低內隱自尊者比高內隱自者會比較傾向使用宣稱性自我設限,容易表達出他注意力不集中、有壓力等口語訊息;(5)外顯與內隱自尊對宣稱式自我設限有交互作用效果:高外顯/低內隱自尊者(威脅性自尊者)比高外顯/高內隱自尊者(安全性自尊者)容易使用宣稱式的自我設限策略;(6) 外顯與內隱自尊對非口語焦慮行為頻率有交互作用效果:高外顯/低內隱自尊者(威脅性自尊者)比高外顯/高內隱自尊者(安全性自尊者)表現出更多的不安、緊張等臉部與行為的表情。研究中亦嘗試討論情境、內隱自尊、外顯自尊對宣稱式自我設限的三因子交互作用,與兩類自尊各自在不同情境中的主要效果。
第一章 緒論 7
第一節 研究動機與研究目的 7
第二節 文獻探討 10
壹、自尊 10
貳、自我設限 25
参、自尊對自我設限行為的影響 31
肆、非口語焦慮行為 33
第三節 研究問題與假設 36
第二章 研究方法 39
第一節 實驗參與者與實驗設計 39
壹、實驗參與者 39
貳、實驗設計 40
第二節 實驗程序 41
第三節 研究工具 47
第三章 研究結果 59
第一節 描述統計量 59
壹、樣本的特性 59
貳、各個變項的計分方式與描述統計量 60
第二節 變項的檢驗 65
壹、操弄變項的檢驗 65
貳、依變項間的相關分析 67
貳、性別的影響 73
第三節 主要分析結果 74
壹、外顯自尊與內隱自尊的關係 74
貳、外顯自尊與不同情境對不同自我設限行為的作用 75
参、內隱自尊與不同情境對不同自我設限行為的作用 81
肆、外顯自尊與內隱自尊的組合型態對不同自我設限策略的作用 85
伍、外顯自尊與內隱自尊的組合型態與非口語焦慮行為的關係 88
第四節 其他分析結果 91
壹、內隱自尊與外顯自尊在不同情境中對宣稱性自我設限行為的影響 91
貳、外顯自尊在各情境中的主要效果 98
参、內隱自尊在各情境中的主要效果 100
第四章 總結與建議 102
第一節 研究結果總結 102
參、兩種自尊在各情境中的影響 105
第二節 研究限制與後續研究建議 107
參考文獻 109
附錄 118
表 目 錄
表1-1 認知經驗自我理論中的兩大訊息處理系統 13
表1-2 內隱自尊IAT的分類項目 17
表1-3 內隱自尊的反應作業 18
表1-4 自我設限的分類形式與舉例 28
表2-1 四種實驗情境 40
表2-2 外顯自尊三份量表 48
表2-3 喜好度極端之詞彙 51
表2-4 內隱自尊的反應作業 51
表2-5 評量者須加以觀察的焦慮行為 55
表2-6 影片評量分配 57
表3-1 樣本人口學變項描述統計表 59
表3-2 外顯自尊得分的描述統計量 60
表3-3內隱自尊描述統計量 62
表3-4 受試練習行為狀況 64
表3-5 非口語焦慮行為「頻率」與「強度」的描述統計量 64
表3-6 情境對「宣稱策略使用程度」的變異數分析摘要表 65
表3-7 四組情境受試者「宣稱策略使用程度」的平均數和標準差 65
表3-8 情境對「練習時間」與「練習題數」的變異數分析摘要表 66
表3-9 四組情境受試者「練習時間」與「練習題數」的平均數和標準差 67
表3-10 所有受試者依變項相關分析 68
表3-11 控制組受試者依變項相關分析 69
表3-12宣稱策略暗示組受試者依變項相關分析 70
表3-13行為策略暗示組受試者依變項相關分析 71
表3-14宣稱與行為皆暗示組受試者依變項相關分析 72
表3-15 外顯自尊與內隱自尊的相關分析 74
表3-16四類自尊類型的人數 75
表3-17 「外顯自尊」與「情境」在「宣稱策略使用程度」的變異數分析摘要表 76
表3-18 四個操弄情境受試者「宣稱策略使用程度」的平均數與標準差 76
表3-19 外顯自尊與情境二因子在「練習時間」的變異數分析摘要表 78
表3-20 高低外顯自尊者在四組情境的練習時間 78
表3-21 外顯自尊與情境二因子在「練習題數」的變異數分析摘要表 79
表3-22 外顯自尊在不同情境的單純主要效果 80
表3-23「內隱自尊」與「情境」在「宣稱策略使用程度」的變異數分析摘要表 82
表3-24 高低內隱自尊者宣稱策略使用程度的平均數與標準差 82
表3-25「內隱自尊」與「情境」在「練習時間」與「練習題數」變異數分析摘要表 85
表3-26 外顯自尊與內隱自尊對「宣稱策略使用程度」的變異數分析摘要表 86
表3-27 內隱自尊在不同外顯自尊內的單純主要效果 86
表3-28 「外顯自尊」與「內隱自尊」對「練習時間」「練習題數」的變異數分析摘要表 87
表3-29 「外顯自尊」與「內隱自尊」對「非口語焦慮行為頻率」的變異數分析摘要 88
表3-30 內隱自尊在高低外顯自尊中「非口語焦慮行為頻率」的單純主要效果 89
表3-31「外顯自尊」與「內隱自尊」對「非口語焦慮行為強度」的變異數分析摘要 90
表3-32 「情境」、「外顯自尊」、「內隱自尊」對「宣稱策略使用程度」三因子變異數分析摘要表 92
表3-33 四組情境受試者宣稱策略使用程度的樣本同質性檢驗 92
表3-34 「外顯自尊」與「內隱自尊」在各情境中的單純主要效果考驗摘要表 93
表3-35 內隱自尊單純交互作用變異數分析摘要表 94
表3-36高低外顯自尊者在各情境中的反應狀況 99
表3-37高低內隱自尊者在各情境中的反應狀況 100
表4-1 研究結果整理 104
圖 目 錄
圖1-1 自尊的類型………………………………………………………………………24
圖2-1 受試接受實驗程序流程…………………………………………………………45
圖3-1 四個操弄情境的受試者「宣稱策略使用程度」………………………………77
圖3-2 高外顯自尊者比低外顯自尊者在行為策略暗示組有比較少的練習時間……79
圖3-3 高外顯自尊者比低外顯自尊者在行為策略暗示組有比較少的練習題數……81
圖3-4 高內隱自尊者比低內隱自尊者表現出較多的宣稱策略使用程度……………83
圖3-5 「宣稱暗示組」受試者的宣稱策略使用程度比「控制組」「行為暗示組」高…84
圖3-6 「外顯自尊」與「內隱自尊」對「宣稱策略使用程度」有交互作用效果…87
圖3-7 「外顯自尊」與「內隱自尊」對「非口語焦慮行為頻率」有交互作用效果…89
圖3-8 「外顯自尊」與「內隱自尊」在「控制組」中的宣稱策略使用程度有交互作用效果………………………………………………………………………………95
圖3-9 「外顯自尊」與「內隱自尊」在「宣稱策略暗示組」中的宣稱策略使用程度有交互作用效果……………………………………………………………………96
圖3-10「外顯自尊」與「內隱自尊」在「行為策略暗示組」中的宣稱策略使用程度有交互作用效果……………………………………………………………………97
圖3-11「外顯自尊」與「內隱自尊」在「宣稱與行為策略皆暗示組」中的宣稱策略使用程度沒有交互作用效果………………………………………………………98
邱蜀娟 (2005)。性別刻板印象威脅與自我設限。國立政治大學。未出版之碩士論文。
陳皎眉、王叢桂、孫蒨如 (2006)。社會心理學。台北。雙葉出版社。
陳思宜 (2006)。華人的自我評價:內隱與外顯測量的證據。國立中正大學未出版之碩士論文。
陳學志、李威震、周泰安、卓淑玲 (2002)。以內隱聯結測驗(IAT)測量國人自尊的可行性研究。中國測驗學會測驗年刊,49輯,2期,217-234頁。
余思賢、孫蒨如 (2004)。「華人的內隱自尊」。本土心理學研究,22期,329-357。
Aidman, E. V. (1999). Measuring individual differences in implicit self-concept: Initial validation of the Self-Apperception Test. Personality and Individual Differences. Vol 27 (2) Aug 1999, 211-228.
Anderson, N. H. (1974). Cognitive algebra: Integration theory applied to social attribution. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 1-101). New York: Academic Press.
Arkin, R. M. & Baumgardner, A. H. (1985) Self-handicapping. In J. H. Harvey & G. W. Weary(Eds.), Attribution: Basic issues and applications. (pp. 169-202). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Bargh, J. A. & Ferguson, M. J. (2000). Beyond behaviorism: On the automaticity of higher mental processes. Psychological Bulletin, Vol 126(6), Nov 2000. Special issue: Psychology in the 21st Century. pp. 925-945.
Baumeister, R. F. & Cairns, K. J.(1992). Repression and self-presentation: When audiences interfere with self-deceptive strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 62(5), May 1992. pp. 851-862.
Baumeister, R. F., Smart, L., & Boden, J. M. (1996). The relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: The dark side of high self-esteem. Psychological Review, 103, 5–33.
Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Hutton, D. G. (1989). Self-presentational motivations and personality differences in self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 57(3), 547-579.
Baumeister, R. F., Heatherton, T. F., & Tice, D. M. (1993). When ego threats lead to self-regulation failure: Negative consequences of high self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 141–156.
Beck, B. L., Koons, S. R., & Milgrim, D. L. (2000). Correlates and consequences of behavioral procrastination: The effects of academic procrastination, self-consciousness, self-esteem and self-handicapping. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 15(5), 3-13.
Berglas, S. & Jones, E. E. (1978). Drug choice as a self-handicapping strategy in response to noncontingent success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36 (4), 405-417.
Blaine, B., & Crocker, J. (1993). Self-esteem and self-serving biases in reaction to positive and negative events: An integrative review. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard (pp. 55–85). New York: Plenum Press.
Bosson, J. K., Brown, R. P., Zeigler-Hill, V., & Swann, W. B. , Jr. (2003). Selfenhancement tendencies among people with high explicit self-esteem: The moderating role of implicit self-esteem. Self and Identity, 2, 169–187.
Bosson, J. K., Swann, W. B., Jr., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2000). Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: The blind men and the elephant revisited? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 631–643.
Brown, J. D. (1993). Self-esteem and self-evaluation: Feeling is believing. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 4, pp. 27–58). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brown, R. P., & Bosson, J. K. (2001). Narcissus meets Sisyphus: Self-love, selfloathing, and the never-ending pursuit of self-worth. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 210–213.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1995). Human agency: The basis for true self-esteem. In M. H. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 31–50). New York: Plenum Press.
DeHart, T. & Pelham B. W. (2007). Fluctuations in state implicit self-esteem in response to daily negative events. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. Volume 43, Issue 1, January 2007, Pages 157-165
Devine, D. J. Clayton, L. D. Dunford, B. B. Seying, R. & Pryce, J. Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, Vol 7(3), Sep 2001. pp. 622-727.,
Dijksterhuis, A. (2004). I like myself but I don’t know why: Enhancing implicit self-esteem by subliminal evaluative conditioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 345–355.
Epstein, S. (1983). The unconscious, the preconscious, and the self-concept. In J. Suls & A. Greenwald (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 2, pp. 220–247). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Epstein, S., Morling, B. (1995). Is the self motivated to do more than enhance and/or verify itself? In: Kernis H M. (Ed.).Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem. New York:Press.
Farnham S. D., Greenwald, A. D. & Banaji, M. R. (1999). From implicit self-esteem to in-group favoritism. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Fazio, R. H. & Hermann, A. D. (2006). Reporting Tendencies Underlie Discrepancies Between Implicit and Explicit Measures of Self-Esteem. Psychological Science. In press.
Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and uses. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327.
Feick, D. L. & Rhodewalt, F. (1997). The double-edged sword of self-handicapping: discounting, augmentation, and the protection and enhancement of self-esteem. Motivation and Emotion, 21 (2), 147-163.
Greenwald, A. G,; Banaji, M. R. (1995)Implicit Social Cognition. Attitudes, Self-Esteem and Stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102 (1): 4~27.
Greenwald, A. G.,; McGhee, E., & Schwartz JL K. (1998). Measuring Individual Differences in Implicit Cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5): 181~198.
Greenwald, A. G., ; Farnham, S. D. (2000). Using the Implicit Association Test to Measure Self-Esteem and Self-Concept. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 79(6):1022~1038.
Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., et al. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 2002, 109: 3-25.
Has, R. G., Katz, I., Rizzo, N., Bailey, J. & Moore, L.(1992). When Racial Ambivalence Evokes Negative Affect, Using a Disguised Measure of Mood. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 18, No. 6, 786-797
Heatherton, T. F. & Vohs, K. D. (2000). Interpersonal evaluations 82 following threats to self: Role of self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 725-736.
Hetts, J. J.; Sakuma, M. ;Pelham, B. W. (1999). Two roads to positive regard: Implicit and explicit self-evaluation and culture. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. Vol 35(6) Nov 1999, 512-559.
Hetts, J. J., & Pelham, B. W. (2001). A case for the nonconscious self-concept. In Moskowitz, Gordon B. (Ed). Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton Symposium on the Legacy and Future of Social Cognition. (pp.105-123). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.
Higgins, R. L., & Harris, R. N. (1988). Strategic alcohol use: Drinking to self- handicap. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 6 (2), 191-202
Hill, V. Z. (2006). Discrepancies Between Implicit and Explicit Self-Esteem: Implications for Narcissism and Self-Esteem Instability. Journal of Personality 74(1).
Hirt, E. R., Deppe, R. K., & Gordon, L. J. (1991). Self-reported versus behavioral self-handicapping: Empirical evidence for a theoretical distinction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(6), 981-991.
Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, T., Le, H., & Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1369-1385.
Horney, K. (1950). Neurosis and human growth: The struggle toward self-realization. New York: Norton.
Jones, J. T., Pelham, B. W., Mirenberg, M. C., & Hetts, J. J. (2002). Name-letter preferences are not merely mere exposure: Implicit egotism as self-regulation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 170–177.
Jordan, C. H., Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., Hoshino-Browne, E., & Correll, J. (2003). Secure and defensive high self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 969–978.
Kass, J. (2002). The relationship of self-handicapping and self-esteem, to the symptom reporting behavior of primary care patients. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 63 (6-B), 2995.
Kernis, M. H. (2003). Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 1–26.
Kernis, M. H., Cornell, D. P., Sun, C. R., Berry, A. J., & Harlow, T. (1993). There’s more to self-esteem than whether it is high or low: The importance of stability of self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1190–1204.
Kernis, M. H., Grannemann, B. D., & Barclay, L. C. (1989). Stability of selfesteem: Assessment, correlates, and excuse making. Journal of Personality, 60,621–644.
Kernis, M. H., Grannemann, B. D., & Mathis, L. C. (1991). Stability of selfesteem as a moderator of the relation between level of self-esteem and depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 80–84.
Kernis, M. H., & Paradise, A. W. (2002). Distinguishing between fragile and secure forms of high self-esteem. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Self-determination: Theoretical issues and practical applications. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
Kolditz, T. A.; Arkin, R. M. (1982). An impression management interpretation of the self-handicapping strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(3), 492-502.
Leary, M. R. & Shepperd, J. A. (1986). Behavioral self-handicaps versus self-reported handicaps: A conceptual note. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1265-1268.
Martin, K. A. & Brawley, L. R. (2002). Self-handicapping in physical achievement settings: The contributions of self-esteem and self-efficacy. Self and Identity, 1(4), 337-351.
Mayerson NH. & Rhodewalt F. (1988). The role of self-protective attributions in the experience of pain. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 6(2), 203.
Morf, C. C., & Rhodewalt, F. (2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 177–196.
Nosek, B. A, & Smyth, F. L. (2007). A Multitrait-Multimethod Validation of the Implicit Association Test: Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Are Related but Distinct Constructs. Experimental Psychology, Vol 54(1), 2007. pp. 14-29.
Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2001). The Go/No-Go association task. Social Cognition, 19, 625-664.
Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2007). The Implicit Association Test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review (Pp. 265–292). In J. A. Bargh (Ed.), Automatic processes in social thinking and behavior. Psychology Press.
Olson, M. A.; Fazio, R. H.; Hermann, A. D., (2006) Reporting Tendencies Underlie Discrepancies Between Implicit and Explicit . Psychological Science. In press.
Pelham, B. W., & Hetts, J. J. (1999). Implicit and explicit personal and social identity: Toward a more complete understanding of the social self. In T. Tyler & R. Kramer (Eds.), The psychology of the social self (pp. 115–143). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Prapavessis, H. & Grove, J. (1998). Self-handicapping and self-esteem. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 10 (2), 175-184.
Pyszczynski, Tom; Holt, Kathleen; Greenberg, Jeff. Depression, self-focused attention, and expectancies for positive and negative future life events for self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 52(5), May 1987. pp. 994-1001.
Rhodewalt, F., Tragakis, M., & Finnerty, J. (2006). Narcissism and self-handicapping: Linking self-aggrandizement to behavior. Journal of Research in Personality.
Robins, R. W., Hendin, H. M., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 151–161.
Salmivalli, C., Kaukiainen. A., Kaistaniemi, L.,& Lagerspetz, K. M. J.(1999). Self-Evaluated Self-Esteem, Peer-Evaluated Self-Esteem, and Defensive Egotism as Predictors of Adolescents’ Participation in Bullying Situations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 25, No. 10, 1268-1278 (1999)
Schimmack, U., & Diener, E. (2003). Predictive validity of explicit and implicit self-esteem for subjective well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 100–106.
Schmukle, S. C. & Egloff, B.(2004). Does the Implicit Association Test for assessing anxiety measure state and trait variance. European Journal of Personality.Vol 18, 483.
Schneider, D. J., & Turkat, D. (1975). Self-presentation following success or failure: Defensive self-esteem models. Journal of Personality, 43, 127–135.
Schröder-Abé, M., Rudolph, A., Wiesner, A. & Schütz A.(2007). Self-esteem discrepancies and defensive reactions to social feedback. International Journal of Psychology, Volume 42, Issue 3 June 2007 , pages 174 - 183
Shepperd, J. A & Arkin, R. M. (1989). Self-handicapping: The moderating roles of public self-consciousness and task importance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15 (2), 252-265.
Shimizu, M., & Pelham, B. W. (2004). The unconscious cost of good fortune: Implicit and explicit self-esteem, positive life events, and health. Health Psychology, 23, 101–105.
Snyder, C. R. & Smith, T. W. (1982). Symptoms as self-handicapping strategies: The virtues of old wine in a new bottle. In G. Weary & H. L. Mirels(Eds.), Integrations of clinical and social psychology(pp. 104-127). New York: Oxford University Press.
Smith, T. W., Snyder, C. R., & Handelsman, M. M. (1982). On the self-serving function of an academic wooden leg: Test anxiety as a self-handicapping strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42 (2), 314-321.
Spalding, LR & Harding, CD (1999). Unconscious unease and self-handicapping: Behavioral. consequences of individual differences in implicit and explicit self-esteem. Psychological Science, 10, 535-539.
Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In L. Berkowitz, (Ed). Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 21: Social psychological studies of the self: Perspectives and programs. (pp. 261-302). Academic Press.
Swanson, J. E., Rudman, L. A., & Greenwald, A. G. (2001). Using the Implicit Association Test to investigate attitude-behaviour consistency for stigmatised behaviour. Cognition & Emotion, 15, 207-230.
Tesser, A. & Cornell, D. P. (1991). On the confluence of self processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. Vol 27(6) Nov 1991, 501-526.
Tice, D. M. & Baumeister, R. F. (1990). Self-esteem, self-handicapping, and self-presentation: The strategy of inadequate practice. Journal of Personality, 58 (2), 443-464.
Tennen, H., & Affleck, G. (1993). The puzzles of self-esteem: A clinical perspective. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard (pp. 241–262). New York: Plenum Press.
Thompson, M. M. & Zanna, M. P.(1995). The Conflicted Individual: Personality-Based and Domain Specific Antecedents of Ambivalent Social Attitudes. Journal of Personality. Volume 63 Issue 2 Page 259-288
Verkuyten, M. (1996). Personal self-esteem and prejudice among ethnic majority and minority youth. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 248–263.
Verkuyten, M., & Masson, K. (1995). New racism,’’ self-esteem, and ethnic relations among minority and majority youth in the Netherlands. Social Behavior and Personality, 23, 137–154.
Vohs, K. D., & Heatherton, T.F. (2001). Self-esteem and threats to self: Implications for self-construals and interpersonal perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1103-1118.
WegnerD M, Bargh J A1998 Control and automaticity in social life. In: Gilbert D T, Fiske S T, Lindzey G (eds.) Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, Boston, Vol. 1, pp. 446±96
Wilson, T. D., Hodges, S. D. & LaFleur, S. J. (1995). Effects of introspecting about reasons: Inferring attitudes from accessible thoughts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 16-28.
Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107, 101–126.