跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 張琬琪
Chang, Wan Chi
論文名稱: 考試導向的學習情境下試題預覽學習單對提升國中生英語學習動機與學習成就之效益
The effect of the test-question preview worksheets on promoting junior high school students' English learning motivation and English achievement in a test-oriented learning context
指導教授: 尤雪瑛
Yu, Hsueh ying
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 外國語文學院 - 英語教學碩士在職專班
The Master of Arts in English Teaching
論文出版年: 2013
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 149
中文關鍵詞: 英語學習動機英語學習成就台灣
外文關鍵詞: English learning motivation, English achievement, Taiwan
相關次數: 點閱:184下載:62
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 動機雖被認定為影響第二語言及外語學習的因素之一,然而如何在考試導向的學習環境下提升學生內在或自主性英語學習動機的相關研究並不多。本研究依據自我決定理論(the self-determination theory)來設計學習單,用以輔助學生學習學校的一般英語課程,來探討自我決定理論在現行教育環境下使用的效益。此外,學習單的使用是否能幫助學生的成就表現優於其他學生也一併研究。
    參與本研究的對象為台灣北部一所公立國中八年級兩個班的六十位學生。這兩個班級有相似的社會背景及英語成就表現,並隨機被指定為實驗組與控制組。實驗組可在考試前預覽印在學習單上的試題,而控制組則直接參與考試。本實驗歷時七週,蒐集資料的工具包含問卷、學習單和該學校所舉辦的英語成就測驗(英語段考)。研究方法含量化及質性分析,主要探討學習單對學生的三個英語學
    習動機元素(autonomy, competence and relatedness)及英語成就表現的影響。
    研究結果顯示高成就學生的主動性(autonomy)及中等成就學生的主動性(autonomy)、自我感知的英語能力(perceived competence)以及與同儕、老師間的相關性(relatedness)有提升。然而,低成就學生的三個英語學習動機元素則下降。另外,實驗組在該學校所舉辦的英語成就測驗的表現和對照組相比並無明顯差異。本研究最後對使用學習單提升學生內在或自主性學習動機在實際教學上的應用提供建議,以作為參考。


    Although motivation has been viewed as an important factor that affects second and foreign language acquisition, there isn’t much research investigating how to promote students’ intrinsic or more self-regulated motivation to learn English in test-oriented classroom settings. This study explores this area by complementing students’ regular English classes at school with the worksheets designed based on the self-determination theory. Furthermore, it also investigates whether students with the aid of the worksheets would outperform those not using the worksheets academically.
    For this research purpose, two classes of 60 eighth-graders in a public junior high school in northern Taiwan took part in this study. The two classes with similar social background and English academic performances were randomly classified into an experimental group and a control group. The experimental group was given a chance to preview the test questions which were printed on the worksheets distributed to them as the complementary material before the tests. The control group, on the other hand, was given the tests directly without the chance to preview the test questions. The experiment lasted for seven weeks, and the data were collected through three instruments, a questionnaire, the worksheets, and a school administered-achievement test. Both quantitative and qualitative research methods were adopted to probe into the influence of the worksheets upon the participants’ three motivational components, namely autonomy, competence, and relatedness as well as their academic performance on the achievement test.
    The study results indicate that the worksheets could help promote the high achievers’ autonomy and the middle achievers’ autonomy, competence perception and relatedness, but they did not exert positive effects on the low achievers. Furthermore, the experimental group didn’t outperform the control group on the school-administered achievement test. Some pedagogical implications were presented at the end of the thesis.

    Acknowledgements iii
    Table of Contents iv
    List of Tables viii
    List of Figures x
    Chinese Abstract xi
    English Abstract xiii
    Chapter One: Introduction 1
    Background and Motivation 1
    Purpose of Study 3
    Chapter Two: Literature Review 5
    Motivation 5
    Three Traditional Perspectives on Motivation 5
    The Motivational Theories Based on Constructivist Perspective 8
    Goal Theory 8
    Expectancy-value Theory 11
    Self-efficacy Theory 14
    Attribution Theory 17
    Self-determination Theory 21
    The Support for the Three Human Fundamental Needs in Education and Second/Foreign Language Learning 24
    Autonomy 24
    Competence 27
    Relatedness 28
    Learning Motivation Research in Taiwan 31
    Worksheets Used in English Classes 33
    Chapter Three: Methodology 35
    Participants 35
    Instruments 36
    The Principles for Designing the Test-question Preview Worksheets and the English Learning Motivation Questionnaire 36
    Test-question Preview Worksheets 38
    The Test Section 38
    The Advanced Exercise Section 41
    The Student Self-evaluation Section 42
    The Student/Teacher Feedback Section 45
    The Two Stages of Completing the Worksheets Learning 46
    English Learning Motivation Questionnaire 48
    A School-administered English Achievement Tests 50
    Data Analysis Methods 50
    Procedure 53
    Pilot Study 53
    The Procedure of the Pilot Study 53
    The Results of the Pilot Study and the Modifications 54
    The Test-question Preview Worksheets 54
    The English Learning Motivation Questionnaire 55
    Formal Study 57
    Chapter Four: Results and Discussion 59
    The Statistical Results of the English Learning Motivation Questionnaire 59
    The Changes of the Experimental High Group’s Three Motivational Components 61
    The Changes of the Experimental Middle Group’s Three Motivational Components 65
    The Changes of the Experimental Low Group’s Three Motivational Components 69
    The Analysis of the Open Questions on the Test-question Preview Worksheets 73
    Discussion on the Findings of the Analysis on the English Learning Motivation questionnaire and the Test-question Preview Worksheets 87
    The Influence of the worksheet learning upon the Participants’ Autonomy for Learning English 87
    High Group 87
    Middle Group 90
    Low Group 93
    The Influence of the worksheet learning upon the Participants’ Competence Perception 96
    High Group 96
    Middle Group 98
    Low Group 100
    The Influence of the worksheet learning upon the Participants’ Relatedness with Their Classmates and the Teacher 103
    High Group 103
    Middle Group 104
    Low Group 106
    Report and Discussion of the Results of the School-administered English Achievement Test 108
    Chapter Five: Conclusion 111
    Summary of Major Findings 111
    Pedagogical Implications 114
    Limitations of the Study 116
    Suggestions for Future Research 117
    References 119
    Appendixes 131

    LIST OF TABLES

    Table 4.1 Independent-samples T-test of the Experimental and the Control Groups’ Competence Perception, Autonomy and Relatedness before the Treatment 60
    Table 4.2 Paired-samples T-test of the Experimental and the Control Groups’ Competence Perception, Autonomy and Relatedness 61
    Table 4.3 Paired-samples T-test of the Experimental High Groups’ Competence Perception, Autonomy and Relatedness 62
    Table 4.4 The Descriptive Statistical Results of the Experimental High Group’s Questionnaire Scores 63
    Table 4.5 Paired-samples T-test of the Experimental Middle Groups’ Competence Perception, Autonomy and Relatedness 66
    Table 4.6 The Descriptive Statistical Results of the Experimental Middle Group’s Questionnaire Scores 67
    Table 4.7 Paired-samples T-test of the Experimental Low Groups’ Competence Perception, Autonomy and Relatedness 69
    Table 4.8 The Descriptive Statistical Results of the Experimental Low Group’s Questionnaire Scores 71
    Table 4.9 Numbers of the Participants Setting Goals 74
    Table 4.10 Numbers of the Participants Using Learning Strategies for Preparing for the Test questions 76
    Table 4.11 Numbers of the Participants Feeling Satisfied or Dissatisfied with the Test Results 78
    Table 4.12 Numbers of the Participants Giving Reasons for Feeling Satisfied or Dissatisfied with the Test Results 79
    Table 4.13 Numbers of the Participants Stating Gains from the Worksheet Learning 81
    Table 4.14 Numbers of the Participants Giving Reasons for Feeling Thankful to Their Classmates and the Teacher 82
    Table 4.15 Numbers of the Participants Giving Feedback on the Worksheet Learning 84
    Table 4.16 Independent-samples T-test of the Experimental and Control Groups’/Subgroups’ Scores of the School-administered English Achievement Test 108

    LIST OF FIGURES

    Figure 3.1 The Procedure of the Formal Study 57

    Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning
    strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80,
    260-267.
    Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of
    Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
    Assor, A., Kaplan, H., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Roth, G. (2005). Directly controlling teacher
    behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: The
    role of anger and anxiety. Learning and Instruction, 15, 397-413.
    Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk taking behavior. Psychological
    Review, 64, 359-372.
    Ausubel, D. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart
    & Winston.
    Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.
    Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
    Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: Social cognitive theory.
    Englewood cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning.
    Educational Psychologist, 28, 117-148.
    Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
    Barker, G., & Graham, S. (1987). A developmental study of praise and blame as
    attributional cues. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 62-66.
    Blackwell, L., Trzesniewski, & Dweck, C. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict
    achievement across adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention.
    Child development, 78, 246-263.

    Brophy, J. (2010). Motivating Students to Learn (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
    Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson
    Education.
    Butler, R. (1992). What young people want to know when; Effects of mastery and ability
    goals on interest in different kinds of social comparisons. Journal of Personality and
    Social Psychology, 62(6), 934-943.
    Chang, A., & Bordia, P. (2001). A multidimensional approach to the group cohesion—group performance relationship. Small group Research, 32, 379-405.
    Chang, Y. H. (2010). Group process and EFL learners’ motivation: A study of group dynamics in EFL classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 44(1), 129-154.
    Child, D. (1994). Psychology and the teacher (5th ed.). London: Cassell.
    Clement, R., Dornyei, Z., & Noels, K., (1994). Motivation, self-confidence , and group
    cohesion in the foreign language classroom. Language Learning, 44(3), 417-448.
    Covington, M. & Omelich, C. (1984). An empirical examination of Weiner’s critique of
    attribution research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1214-1225.
    Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human
    behavior. New York: Plenum.
    Deci, E., Vallerand, R., Pelletier, L., & Ryan, R. (1991). Motivation and education:
    the self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3/4), 325-346.
    Deci, E., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B., & Leone, D. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The
    self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62, 119-142.
    Deci, E. & Ryan, R. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and
    the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
    Diener, C., & Dweck, C. (1978). An analysis of learned helplessness: Continuous changes
    in performance, strategy, and achievement cognitions following failure. Journal of
    Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 451-462.
    Diener, C., & Dweck, C. (1980). An analysis of learned helplessness: II. The processing
    of success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 940-952.
    Doff, A. (1988). Teach English. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Dornyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom.
    Modern Language Journal, 78(3), 273-284.
    Dornyei, Z. (1990). Conceptualization motivation in foreign language learning. Language Learning, 40, 46-78.
    Dornyei, Z. (2001). New themes and approaches in second language motivation research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 43-59.
    Dweck, C. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41,
    1040-1048.
    Dweck, C., & Leggett, E. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and
    personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
    Dweck, C. & Molden. (2005). Self-theories: Their impact on competence motivation and
    acquisition. In A. Elliot & C. Dweck (Ed.), Handbook of competence and motivation
    (pp. 122-140). New York: Guilford.
    Earley, P., & Lituchy, T. (1991). Delineating goal and efficacy effects: A test of three
    models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 71-98.
    Eccles, J., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents’
    achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social
    Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215-225.
    Ehrman, M., & Dornyei, Z. (1998). Interpersonal dynamics in second language
    education: The visible and invisible classroom Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Eisenberger, R. (1992). Learned industriousness. Psychological Review, 99, 248-267.
    Elliot, A., Faler, J., McGregor, H., Campbell, W., Sedikides, C., & Harackiewicz, J.
    (2000). Competence valuation as a strategic intrinsic motivation process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 780-794.
    Elliot, A., & Church, M. (2003). A motivational analysis of defensive pessimism and
    self-handicapping. Journal of Personality, 71, 369-396.
    Elliott, E., & Dweck, C. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement.
    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 5-12.
    Entwistle, N., & Tait, H. (1990). Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and
    preferences for contrasting academic environments. Higher Education, 19, 169-194.
    Evans, C. R., & Dion, K. L. (1991). Group cohesion and performance: A meta analysis.
    Small Group Research, 22, 175-186.
    Fang, Y. (2010). Perceptions of the computer-assisted writing program among EFL college learners. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 246-256.
    Forsterling, F. (1985). Attributional retraining: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 98,
    495-512.
    Forsyth, D. R. (1990). Group dynamics (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
    Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of
    attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.
    Good, C., Aronson, J., & Inzlicht, N. (2003). Improving adolescents’ standardized test
    performance: An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat. Journal of
    Applied Developmental Psychology, 24, 645-662.
    Good, T., & Brophy, J. (1994). Looking in Classrooms (4th ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
    Graham, S. (1984). Communicating sympathy and anger to black and white children: The
    cognitive (attributional) antecedents of affective cues. Journal of Personality and
    Social Psychology, 47, 40-54.
    Graham, S. (1990). Communicating low ability in the classroom: Bad things good
    teachers sometimes do. In S. Graham & V. Folkes (Ed.), Attribution theory:
    Applications to achievement, mental health, and interpersonal conflict (pp. 17-36).
    Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Grolnick, W. S. & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Parent styles associated with children’s
    self-regulation and competence in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2),
    143-154.
    Guay, F., Boggiano, A., & Vallerand, R. (2001). Autonomy support, intrinsic motivation,
    and perceived competence: conceptual and empirical linkages. Personality and
    Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 643-650.
    Guay, F., Ratelle, C., & Chanal, J. (2008). Optimal learning in optimal contexts: the role
    of self-determination in education. Canadian Psychology, 49, 233-240.
    Hansen, D. (1989). Lesson evading and lesson dissembling: Ego strategies in the
    classroom. American Journal of Education, 97, 184-208.
    Harackiewicz, J., Barron, K., Tauer, J., Carter, S., & Elliot, A. (2000). Short-term and
    long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance
    over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 316-330.
    Hardre, P., Chen, C., Huang, S., Chiang, C., Jen, F., & Warden, L. (2006). Factors
    affecting high school students’ academic motivation in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal
    of Education, 26, 198-207.
    Harter, S. (1978). Pleasure derived from challenge and the effects of receiving grades on
    children’s difficulty level choices. Child Development, 49, 788-799.
    Harter, S., & Connell, J. P. (1984). A comparison of alternative models of the
    relationships between academic achievement and children’s perceptions of
    competence, control and motivational orientation. In J. Nicholls (Ed.), The
    development of achievement-related cognitions and behaviors (pp.219-250). Greenwich, CT.: JAI Press.
    Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
    Henson, R. K. (2001). Understanding internal consistency reliability estimates: A conceptual primer on coefficient alpha. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 177-189.
    Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy in Foreign Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
    Horwitz, E. (2001). Language anxiety and achievement. Annual Review of Applied
    Linguistics, 21, 112-126.
    Hunt, J. McV. (1966). The epigenesis of intrinsic motivation and early cognitive learning.
    In R. N. Haber (Ed.), Current research in motivation (pp.355-370). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    Jane, H. (2008). Supporting students’ motivation, engagement, and learning during an
    uninteresting activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 798-811.
    Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning together and alone (4rd ed.).
    Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
    Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M. (2007). The contributions and prospects of goal orientation
    theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 141-184.
    Kazdin, A, & Bootzin, R. (1972). The token economy: An evaluative review. Journal of
    Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 343-372.
    Kazdin, A. (1975). Recent advances in token economy research. In M. Hersen, R. Eisler,
    & P. Miller (Eds.), Progress in behavior modification: Vol. 1. (pp. 233-274). New
    York: Academic Press.
    Kazdin, A. (1988). The token economy: A decade later. In G. Davey, & C. Cullen (Ed.),
    Human operant conditioning and behavior modification (pp.119-137). New York:
    John Wiley & Sons.
    Kohn, A. (1993). Punished by rewards: The trouble with gold stars, incentive plans, A’s,
    praise, and other bribes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
    Lee, S. Y. (2012). Storytelling supported by technology: An alternative for EFL children with learning difficulties. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(3), 297-307.
    Licht, B. & Dweck, C. (1984). Determinants of academic achievement: The interaction of
    children’s achievement orientations with skill area. Developmental Psychology, 20,
    628-636.
    Linnenbrink, E., & Pintrich, P. (2002). Achievement goal theory and affect: An
    asymmetrical bidirectional model. Educational Psychology, 37, 69-78.
    Losier, G., & Koestner, R. (1999). Intrinsic versus identified regulation in distinct political
    campaigns: The consequences of following politics for pleasure versus personal
    meaningfulness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 287-298.
    Maehr, M., & Meyer, H. (1997). Understanding motivation and schooling: Where we’ve
    been, where we are, and where we need to go. Educational Psychology Review, 9,
    371-409.
    Maslow, A. (1970). Motivation and personality (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
    Meece, J., Blumenfeld, P., & Hoyle, R. (1988). Students’ goal orientations and cognitive
    engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80,
    514-523.
    Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. (2001). Performance-approach goals: Good for
    what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of
    Educational Psychology, 93, 77-86.
    Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to
    academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling
    Psychology, 38, 30-38.
    Noels, K., Clement, R., & Pelletier, L. (1999). Perceptions of teachers’ communicative
    style and students’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Modern Language Journal, 83,
    23-34.
    O’Leary, K. & Drabman, R. (1971). Token reinforcement programs in the classroom: A
    review. Psychological Bulletin, 75, 397-398.
    O’Leary, K. (1978). The operant and social psychology of token systems. In A. Catania,
    & T. Brigham (Ed.), Handbook of applied behavior analysis: Social and
    instructional processes (pp. 179-207). New York: Irvington.
    Otis, N. Grouzet, F., & Pelletier, L. (2005). Latent motivational change in an academic
    setting: A 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97,
    170-183.
    Oxford, R. L., & Shearin, J. (1994). Language learning motivation: Expanding the theoretical framework. Modern Language Journal, 78, 12-28.
    Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning
    components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational
    Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
    Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy
    during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 209-218.
    Rudolph, U., Roesch, S. C., Greitemeyer, T., & Weiner, B. (2004). A meta-analytic review
    of help giving and aggression from an attribution perspective. Cognition and
    Emotion, 18, 815-848.
    Ryan, R. (1982). Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of
    cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(3),
    450-461.
    Ryan, R. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative process.
    Journal of Personality, 63, 397-427.
    Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2006). Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will? Journal of Personality,
    74, 1557-1585.
    Schloss, p., & Smith, M. (1994). Applied behavior analysis in the classroom. Boston:
    Allyn & Bacon.
    Schunk, D. H. (1995). Self-efficacy and education and instruction. In J. E. Maddux (Ed.),
    Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application (pp.
    281-303). New York: Plenum.
    Senior, R. (2002). A class-centered approach to language teaching. English Language
    Teachers Journal, 56(4), 397-403.
    Senko, C., & Harackiewicz, J. (2005). Regulation of achievement goals: The role of
    competence feedback. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 320-326.
    Senko, C., & Miles, K. (2008). Pursuing their own learning agenda: How
    mastery-oriented students jeopardize their class performance. Contemporary
    Educational Psychology, 33, 561-583.
    Sexton, T., & Tuckman, B. (1991). Self-beliefs and behavior: The role of self-efficacy and
    outcome expectation over time. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 725-736.
    Sheldon, K., & Krieger, L. (2007). Understanding the negative effects of legal education
    on law students: A longitudinal test of self-determination theory. Personality and
    Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 883-897.
    Shim, S., Ryan, A., & Anderson, C. (2008). Achievement goals and achievement during
    early adolescence: Examining time-varying predictor and outcome variables in
    growth-curve analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 655-671.
    Skinner, (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
    Skinner, E., & Belmont, M. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of
    teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of
    Educational Psychology, 85, 571-581.
    Smiley, P., & Dweck, C. (1994). Individual differences in achievement goals among
    young children. Child Development, 65, 1723-1743.
    Soenens, B., & Vansteenskiste, M. (2005). Antecedents and outcomes of
    self-determination in three life domains: The role of parents’ and teachers’ autonomy
    support. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 589-604.
    Su, S. W. (2010). Motivating and justifiable: Teaching western literature to EFL students
    at a university of science and technology. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 14(1), 1-35.
    Thorndike, E. (1898). Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative
    processes in animals. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 2(4), i-109.
    Thrash, T., & Elliot, A. (2001). Delimiting and integrating achievement motive and goal
    constructs. In A. Efklides, J. Kuhl, & R. Sorrentino (Ed.), Trends and prospects in
    motivation research (pp. 3-21). Boston: Kluwer.
    Tsai, C. H. (2012). Students’ perceptions of using a novel as main material in the EFL reading course. English Language Teaching, 5(8), 103-112.
    Valle, A., Cabanach, R., Nunez, J., Gonzalez-Pienda, J., Rodriguez, S., & Pineiro, I.
    (2003). Multiple goals, motivation and academic learning. British Journal of
    Educational Psychology, 73, 71-87.
    Vallerand, R. J. & Reid, G. (1988). On the relative effects of positive and negative verbal
    feedback on males and females’ intrinsic motivation. Canadian Journal of
    Behavioral Sciences, 20(3), 239-250.
    Vansteenkiste, M. Simons, J., Lens, W., Soenens, B, & Matos, L. (2005). Examining the
    impact of extrinsic versus intrinsic goal framing and internally controlling versus
    autonomy-supportive communication style upon early adolescents’ academic
    achievement. Child Development, 76, 483-501.
    Wang, M. C. & Peverly, S. T. (1986). The self-instructive process in classroom learning
    contexts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11(4), 370-404.
    Warden, C. A., & Lin, H. J. (2000). Existence of integrative motivation in an Asian EFL setting. Foreign Language Annals, 33(5), 535-547.
    Weiner, B. (1985). “Spontaneous” causal thinking. Psychology Bulletin, 97, 74-84.
    Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York:
    Springer.
    Weiner, B. (1992). Human motivation: Metaphors, theories and research. Beverly Hills:
    Sage Publications.
    Weiner, B. (1994). Integrating social and personal theories of achievement striving.
    Review of Educational Research, 64, 557-573.
    Whitley, B., & Frieze, I. (1985). Children’s causal attributions for success and failure in
    achievement settings: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77,
    608-616.
    Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A
    theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12, 265-310.
    Williams, B., Williams, R., & McLaughlin, T. (1991). Classroom procedures for
    remediating behavior disorders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 210-216.
    Williams, G., & Deci, E. (1996). Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical
    students: A test of self-determination theory. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 70, 767-779.
    Williams, M., & Burden, B. (1997). Psychology for language teachers: A social constructivist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Wolters, C. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 236-250.
    Wu, M. L. (2009). SPPS operation and application: The practice of quantitative analysis of questionnaire data (2nd ed.). Taipei: Wunan.
    Wu, W. C., Yen, L. L., & Marek, M. (2011). Using online EFL interaction to increase
    confidence, motivation, and ability. Journal of Educational Technology & Society,
    14(3), 118-129.
    Yang, Y. C., Gamble, J., & Tang, S. S. (2012). Voice over instant messaging as a tool for enhancing the oral proficiency and motivation of English-as-a-foreign-language learners. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 448-464.
    Zimmerman, B. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development. In A. Bandura (Ed.),
    Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 202-231). New York: Cambridge University
    Press.

    QR CODE
    :::