跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 方聿安
Fang, Yu-An
論文名稱: 2018年中美貿易戰背景下機構投資人關注與投資行為分析—以美國與中國企業為例
Institutional Investor Attention and Investment Behavior During the 2018 U.S.-China Trade War: Evidence from U.S. and Chinese Firms
指導教授: 張元晨
Chang, Yuan-Chen
口試委員: 黃柏凱
Huang, Po-Kai
蔡湘萍
Tsai, Hsiang-Ping
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 商學院 - 財務管理學系
Department of Finance
論文出版年: 2025
畢業學年度: 113
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 47
中文關鍵詞: 異常機構關注度機構投資人持股2018年中美貿易戰關稅政策
外文關鍵詞: Abnormal institutional attention (AIA), Institutional ownership, 2018 U.S.- China trade war, Tariff policies
相關次數: 點閱:296下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究以2018年中美貿易戰為背景,探討彭博終端機收集的異常機構關注度(AIA)數據與關稅政策對機構投資人持股變化及未來股價報酬的影響,並選取美國S&P 500指數、中國滬深300指數及香港恒生指數成分股為樣本。實證結果顯示,在美國市場,異常機構關注度與機構持股變化呈現顯著正相關,且機構持股變化具有預測未來股價報酬的能力,顯示美國企業的機構投資人能有效解讀資訊並調整投資組合;關稅政策亦對機構持股調整與市場反應產生顯著影響。相較之下,中國市場的機構投資人則對資訊變動與政策風險反應較不敏感。整體而言,本研究凸顯了市場制度與資訊環境差異對機構投資行為的影響,並為理解地緣政治事件下資本市場的運作提供實證基礎。


    This study examines the impact of abnormal institutional attention (AIA) data collected from the Bloomberg Terminal and tariff policies on institutional ownership changes and future stock returns, using the 2018 U.S.-China trade war as the research context. The sample includes constituent stocks from the U.S. S&P 500 Index, China’s CSI 300 Index, and the Hong Kong Hang Seng Index. Empirical results show that in the U.S. market, AIA is significantly and positively associated with changes in institutional ownership, and such changes have predictive power for future stock returns. This indicates that institutional investors in U.S. firms are able to effectively interpret information and adjust their portfolios accordingly. Tariff policies also exert a significant influence on institutional ownership adjustments and market reactions. In contrast, institutional investors in the Chinese market appear less responsive to changes in information and policy risk. Overall, this study highlights the influence of market structures and information environments on institutional investment behavior and provides empirical evidence for understanding capital market dynamics under geopolitical events.

    第一章 緒論 1
    第一節 研究背景及動機 1
    第二節 研究架構 2
    第二章 文獻回顧 4
    第一節 異常機構關注度 4
    第二節 2018年中美貿易戰 6
    第三節 機構持股比例與未來股價報酬 8
    第四節 研究假說 9
    第三章 研究方法 11
    第一節 樣本篩選標準與資料來源 11
    第二節 樣本說明 12
    第三節 變數說明 13
    第四節 研究方法 15
    第四章 實證結果 19
    第一節 樣本敘述統計 19
    第二節 Welch’s T檢定結果 21
    第三節 複迴歸分析結果 26
    第四節 機構持股變化對未來股價報酬之影響 31
    第五章 結論與建議 36
    第一節 研究結論 36
    第二節 未來研究建議 38
    參考文獻 40
    附錄 43

    Amiti, M., Redding, S. J., & Weinstein, D. (2019). The impact of the 2018 trade war on U.S. prices and welfare. NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH, 25672.
    Amiti, M., Kong, S., & Weinstein, D. (2020). The effect of the U.S.-China trade war on U.S. investment. NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH, 27114.
    Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2008). All that glitters: The effect of attention and news on the buying behavior of individual and institutional investors. The Review of Financial Studies, 21(2), 785–818.
    Ben-Rephael, A., Da, Z., & Israelsen, R. D. (2017). It depends on where you search: Institutional investor attention and under-reaction to news. The Review of Financial Studies, 30(9), 3009–3047.
    Ben-Raphael, A., Carlin, B. I., Da, Z., & Israelsen, R. D. (2021). Information consumption and asset pricing. The Journal of Finance, 76(1), 357–394.
    Chen, X., & Cheng, Q. (2006). Institutional holdings and analysts’ stock recommendations. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 21(4), 399 – 440.
    Chiu, P., Lourie, B., Nekrasov, A., & Siew, H. (2021). Cater to thy client: Analyst responsiveness to institutional investor attention. Management Science, 67(12), 7455–7471.
    Chen, J., tang, G., Yao, J., & Zhou, G. (2022). Investor attention and stock returns. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 57(2), 455–484.
    Chen, X., & Wu, C. (2022). Retail investor attention and information asymmetry: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 75, 101847.
    Engelhardt, N., Krause, M., Neukirchen, D., & Posch, P. (2020). What drives stocks during the Corona-Crash? News attention vs. rational expectation. Sustainability, 12(12), 1–12.
    Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3–56.
    Gompers, P. A., & Metrick, A. (2001). Institutional investors and equity prices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 229–259.
    Grinstein, Y., & Michaely, R. (2005). Institutional holdings and payout policy. The Journal of Finance, 60(3), 1389–1426.
    Goodell, J. W., Kumar, S., Li, X., Pattnaik, D., & Sharma, A. (2022). Foundations and research clusters in investor attention: Evidence from bibliometric and topic modelling analysis. International Review of Economics and Finance, 82, 511–529.
    Hirshleifer, D., & Sheng, J. (2021). Macro news and micro news: Complements or substitutes? Working Paper, 28931.
    Israeli, D., Kasznik, R., & Sridharan, S. A. (2022). Unexpected distractions and investor attention to corporate announcements. Review of Accounting Studies, 27(2), 477–518.
    Liu, H., Peng, L., & Tang, Y. (2023). Retail attention, institutional attention. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 58(3), 1005 - 1038.
    Ng, Y. (2020). Why does the US face greater disadvantages in the trade war with China? China & World Economy, 28(2), 113–122.
    Ouadghiri, I. E., Erragragui, E., Jaballah, J., & Peillex, J. (2022). Institutional investor attention and stock market volatility and liquidity: International evidence. Applied Economics, 54(42), 4839–4854.
    Steinbock, D. (2018). U.S.-China trade war and its global impacts. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies, 4(4), 515–542.
    Yang, S., Shi, B., & Yang, F. (2023). Macroeconomic impact of the Sino–U.S. trade frictions: Based on a two-country, two-sector DSGE model. Research in International Business and Finance, 65(2) :101956.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2029/02/02
    QR CODE
    :::