| 研究生: |
馬立瀅 Maria Guadalupe Robles Sámano |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
亞太自由貿易區(FTAAP)背後的官僚政治:以墨西哥和秘魯為例 The Bureaucratic Politics behind the Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific (FTAAP): Case Study of Mexico and Peru |
| 指導教授: |
馮慕文
Fabricio Antonio Fonseca Fernández |
| 口試委員: |
黃富娟
Florencia Fu-Chuan Huang Gabriela Ippolito-O‵Donnell |
| 學位類別: |
碩士
Master |
| 系所名稱: |
國際事務學院 - 國際研究英語碩士學位學程(IMPIS) International Master's Program in International Studies(IMPIS) |
| 論文出版年: | 2026 |
| 畢業學年度: | 114 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 128 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 官僚政治 、外交政策 、亞太經濟合作 、亞太自由貿易區 、區域經濟整合 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | bureaucratic politics, foreign policy, APEC, Free Trade Area of the AsiaPacific (FTAAP), regional economic integration |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:4 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本論文探討亞太經濟合作(APEC)成員經濟體內部的官僚政治如何影響亞太自由貿易區(Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific, FTAAP)作為區域經濟整合長期目標的持續性。儘管現有文獻主要聚焦於FTAAP的經濟可行性以及區域貿易協定的發展演進,但對於國內官僚運作如何促使此倡議得以持續推動的探討仍相對有限。
本研究以官僚政治與外交政策模型(Bureaucratic politics and foreign policy model)為理論基礎,採用質性比較個案研究方法,分析墨西哥與秘魯兩個APEC成員經濟體,並結合APEC秘書處所提供的觀點進行研究。研究結果顯示,FTAAP的持續推動不僅受到經濟與地緣政治因素的影響,也受到成員經濟體內部的制度協調、官僚體系的延續性,以及跨機構決策機制等因素所共同塑造。
本研究透過將官僚政治與外交政策模型延伸應用於區域經濟整合與多邊治理的分析,對相關文獻作出貢獻,並提供來自兩個拉丁美洲APEC成員經濟體的新實證證據。
This research examines how bureaucratic politics within APEC member economies influence the persistence of the Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific (FTAAP) as a long-term objective of regional economic integration. Although existing literature has primarily focused on the FTAAP's economic feasibility and the evolution of regional trade agreements, scholars have paid limited attention to how domestic bureaucratic processes sustain this initiative.
Based on the bureaucratic politics and foreign policy model, this research employs a qualitative comparative case study of Mexico and Peru, as well as the insights of the APEC Secretariat. The findings show that the persistence of the FTAAP is shaped not only by economic and geopolitical considerations but also by institutional coordination, bureaucratic continuity, and inter-institutional decision-making within member economies.
This study contributes to the literature by extending the application of the bureaucratic politics and foreign policy model to the analysis of regional economic integration and multilateral governance, while providing new empirical evidence from two Latin American APEC member economies.
List of Figures, Tables and Appendices i
Glossary ii
Chapter 1. Introduction 1
1.1 About the Forum 1
1.2 History of the Free Trade Area of the Asia–Pacific (FTAAP) 3
1.3 Literature Review 6
1.3.1 APEC in the Literature 6
1.3.2 FTAAP in the Literature 7
1.3.3 Regional Economic Integration in the Asia-Pacific Region in the Literature 8
1.3.4 Summary 11
1.4 Research Question 11
1.5 Significance of the Research 12
1.6 Theoretical Framework 13
1.6.1 The Bureaucratic Politics and Foreign Policy Model 13
1.7 Methodology 18
1.7.1 Research Variables 18
1.7.2 Research Design and Case Selection 18
1.7.3 Questionnaire Design 20
1.7.4 Data Collection Procedures 20
Chapter 2. Case Studies 22
2.1 APEC Secretariat: Institutional Persistence 22
2.1.1 Institutional Mandate and Administrative Structure 22
2.1.2 Continuity Mechanisms and Organizational Memory 25
2.1.3 Role of the Secretariat in Supporting FTAAP 26
2.1.4 Perceptions of the FTAAP as a Multilateral Practices and Limitations of the Secretariat in Shaping the Agenda 28
2.2 Mexico: Bureaucratic Continuity and Diplomatic Discourse 29
2.2.1 Characteristics of the Mexican Bureaucracy in Trade and Foreign Policy 29
2.2.2 Institutional Actors Involved in APEC and FTAAP 32
2.2.3 Bureaucratic and Political Drivers Behind Mexico's Support for the FTAAP 35
2.2.4 Continuity and Change in Mexico's APEC Policy 38
2.2.5 Mexico as APEC Host in 2002 and Upcoming Host in 2028: Implications for the FTAAP Narrative 40
2.3 Peru: Regional Leadership and Institutional Adaptation 42
2.3.1 Characteristics of the Peruvian Bureaucracy in Trade and Foreign Policy 42
2.3.2 Institutional Actors Involved in APEC and FTAAP 45
2.3.3 Bureaucratic and Political Drivers Behind Peru's Support for the FTAAP 48
2.3.4 Institutional Incentives for the Persistence of the FTAAP 50
2.3.5 Historical Continuity: APEC Host Years (2008, 2016, and 2024) 52
Chapter 3. Comparative Analysis 56
3.1 Introduction 56
3.2 The Role of the APEC Secretariat 56
3.3 Bureaucratic Coordination and Institutional Continuity 58
3.4 Domestic Economic Priorities and Trade Strategy 61
3.5 The FTAAP as a Strategic Regional Narrative 64
3.6 Explaining the Persistence of the FTAAP within APEC 67
3.7 Conclusion 72
Chapter 4. Discussion and Implications 73
4.1 Introduction 73
4.2 Which model best explains the persistence of the FTAAP? 73
4.2.1 Rational Actor Model 73
4.2.2 Organizational Process Model 74
4.2.3 Governmental Politics Model 75
4.2.4 Comparative Assessment of the Three Models 79
4.3 Theoretical Implications for Bureaucratic Politics 79
4.4 Implications for Understanding APEC as a Non-binding Forum 80
4.5 Implications for Regional Economic Integration Strategies 81
4.6 Practical Insights for Policymakers 82
4.7 Closing the Discussion 83
Chapter 5. Conclusion 84
References 87
Appendices 103
Aggarwal, V. K., & Koo, M. G. (2005). Beyond network power? The dynamics of formal economic integration in Northeast Asia. The Pacific Review, 18(2), pp. 189 - 216. Browsed on October 10, 2025. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740500162964
Aggarwal, V.K. & Fogarty, E. (2004). EU trade strategies: regionalism and globalism. Palgrave Macmillan.
Allison, G. T., & Zelikow, P. (1999). Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Longman.
APEC Business Advisory Council, ABAC. (2004). Report to APEC Economic Leaders 2004. Browsed on November 20, 2025. Retrieved from: https://abac.ph/wp-contet/uploads/2022/10/ABAC-2004-Report-to-Economic-Leaders-Vol.-1.pdf
APEC Business Advisory Council, ABAC. (n.d.a). Founding and Structure. Browsed on November 20, 2025. Retrieved from: https://www2.abaconline.org//page-content/2521/content
APEC Business Advisory Council, ABAC. (n.d.b). ABAC Members. Browsed on May 11, 2026. Retrieved from: https://www2.abaconline.org//page-content/2608/members
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, APEC. (1994). 1994 Leaders’ Declaration. Browsed on November 20, 2025. Retrieved from: https://www.apec.org/meeting-papers/leaders-declarations/1994/1994_aelm
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, APEC. (1995). 1995 Leaders’ Declaration. Browsed on November 20, 2025. Retrieved from: https://www.apec.org/meeting-papers/leaders-declarations/1995/1995_aelm
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, APEC. (2002). 2002 Leaders' Declaration. Browsed on February 19, 2026. Retrieved from: https://www.apec.org/meeting-papers/leaders-declarations/2002/2002_aelm
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, APEC. (2006). 2006 Leaders' Declaration. Browsed on November 20, 2025. Retrieved from: https://www.apec.org/meeting-papers/leaders-declarations/2006/2006_aelm
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, APEC. (2007). 2007 Leaders' Declaration. Browsed on February 16, 2026. Retrieved from: https://www.apec.org/meeting-papers/leaders-declarations/2007/2007_aelm
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, APEC. (2008). 2008 Leaders' Declaration. Browsed on February 16, 2026. Retrieved from: https://www.apec.org/meeting-papers/leaders-declarations/2008/2008_aelm
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, APEC. (2009). 2009 Leaders’ Declaration. Browsed on May 26, 2026. Retrieved from: https://www.apec.org/meeting-papers/leaders-declarations/2009/2009_aelm
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, APEC. (2010a). 2010 Leaders' Declaration, Pathways to FTAAP. Browsed on November 20, 2025. Retrieved from: https://www.apec.org/meeting-papers/leaders-declarations/2010/2010_aelm/pathways-to-ftaap
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, APEC. (2010b). 2010 Leaders' Declaration. Browsed on May 12, 2026. Retrieved from: https://www.apec.org/meeting-papers/leaders-declarations/2010/2010_aelm
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, APEC. (2014). 2014 Leaders' Declaration, Annex A - The Beijing Roadmap for APEC's contribution to the Realization of the FTAAP. Browsed on November 20, 2025. Retrieved from: https://www.apec.org/meeting-papers/leaders-declarations/2014/2014_aelm
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, APEC. (2016a). Collective Strategic Study on Issues Related to the Realization of the FTAAP. Browsed on November 20, 2025. Retrieved from: https://www.apec.org/docs/default-source/Publications/2016/11/2016-CTI-Report-to-Ministers/TOC/Appendix-6-Collective-Strategic-Study-on-Issues-Related-to-the-Realization-of-the-FTAAP.pdf
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, APEC. (2016b). 2016 Leaders' Declaration, Annex A: Lima Declaration on FTAAP. Browsed on November 20, 2025. Retrieved from: https://www.apec.org/meeting-papers/leaders-declarations/2016/2016_aelm
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, APEC. (2020a). 2020 APEC Ministerial Meeting. Browsed on November 20, 2025. Retrieved from: https://www.apec.org/meeting-papers/annual-ministerial-meetings/2022/2022-apec-ministerial-meeting
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, APEC. (2020b). 2020 Leaders' Declaration, APEC Putrajaya Vision 2040. Browsed on November 20, 2025. Retrieved from: https://www.apec.org/meeting-papers/leaders-declarations/2020/2020_aelm/annex-a
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, APEC. (2020c). Multilateral Cooperation is a Safeguard against Pandemics. Browsed on October 15, 2025. Retrieved from: https://www.apec.org/press/blogs/2020/0414_covid
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, APEC. (2020d). APEC Ministers Focus on Regional Economic Recovery to Rebuild Better. Browsed on November 10, 2025. Retrieved from: https://www.apec.org/press/news-releases/2020/1116_amm
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, APEC. (2021). 2021 Leaders' Declaration, Annex: Aotearoa Plan of Action. Browsed on November 20, 2025. Retrieved from: https://www.apec.org/meeting-papers/leaders-declarations/2021/2021-leaders-declaration/annex-aotearoa-plan-of-action
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, APEC. (2024a). 2024 APEC Leaders' Machu Picchu Declaration. Browsed on February 18, 2026. Retrieved from: https://www.apec.org/meeting-papers/leaders-declarations/2024/2024-apec-leaders'-machu-picchu-declaration
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, APEC. (2024b). Ichma Statement on A New Look at the Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific agenda. Browsed on October 20, 2025. Retrieved from APEC: https://www.apec.org/meeting-papers/leaders-declarations/2024/2024-apec-leaders'-machu-picchu-declaration/ichma-statement-on-a-new-look-at-the--free-trade-area-of-the-asia-pacific-agenda
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, APEC (2024c). Summary Report - Second Budget and Management Committee Meeting 2024, Peru. Browsed on May 26, 2026. Retrieved from: https://mddb.apec.org/Documents/2024/BMC/BMC2/24_bmc2_summary.pdf
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Secreariat, APEC Secretariat (2024d). Japan Contributes JPY 90 million to Boost Energy Efficiency and Low-Carbon Initiatives, Singapore. Browsed on May 26, 2026. Retrieved from: https://www.apec.org/press/news-releases/2024/japan-contributes-jpy-90-million-to-boost-energy-efficiency-and-low-carbon-initiatives
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, APEC. (2024e). Lima Roadmap to Promote the Transition to the Formal and Global Economies (2025-2040). Browsed on May 14, 2026. Retrieved from APEC: https://www.apec.org/meeting-papers/leaders-declarations/2024/2024-apec-leaders'-machu-picchu-declaration/lima-roadmap-to-promote-the-transition-to-the-formal-and-global-economies-(2025-2040)
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, APEC (n.d.a). Who we are, About us. Browsed on November 20, 2025. Retrieved from: https://apec.org/who-we-are/about-us
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, APEC (n.d.b). APEC Study Centers Consortium. Browsed on November 20, 2025. Retrieved from: https://www.apec.org/engage-with-us/resources/apec-study-centres-consortium
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, APEC (n.d.c). Who we are: Our members. Browsed on April 17, 2026. Retrieved from: https://www.apec.org/who-we-are/our-members
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, APEC (n.d.d). Who we are: How we work. Browsed on April 20, 2026. Retrieved from: https://apec.org/who-we-are/how-apec-operates
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, APEC (n.d.e). Who we are, APEC Secretariat, Leadership. Browsed on May 26, 2026. Retrieved from: https://apec.org/who-we-are/apec-secretariat/leadership
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, APEC (n.d.f). Who we are, APEC Secretariat, APEC Secretariat staff. Browsed on May 26, 2026. Retrieved from: http://apec.org/who-we-are/apec-secretariat/apecsecretariat
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, APECa (n.d.g). APEC Projec Database. Browsed on May 27, 2026. Retrieved from: https://pdb.apec.org/Pages/BasicSearch.aspx
Balassa, B. (1961). The Theory of Economic Integration, Routledge.
Baldwin, R. (2016). The Great Convergence: Information Technology and the New Globalization. Harvard University Press.
Banco de México, BANXICO (2025). Sistema de Información Económica (SIE): Exportaciones de Mercancías por Países. Browsed on May 16, 2016. Retrieved from: https://www.banxico.org.mx/SieInternet/consultarDirectorioInternetAction.do?sector=1&accion=consultarCuadroAnalitico&idCuadro=CA7&locale=es
Beeson, M. (2014). Regionalism and globalization in East Asia: politics, security, and economic development. Palgrave Macmillan
Bergsten, C. F. (1997). Open Regionalism, Peterson Institute for International Economics. Browsed on October 10, 2025. Retrieved from: https://www.piie.com/publications/working-papers/open-regionalism
Bergsten, C. F., Noland, M., & Schott, J. J. (2011). The Free Trade Area of the Asia - Pacific: A Constructive Approach to Multilateralizing Asian Regionalism, Asian Development Bank Institute (336). Browsed on October 18, 2025. Retrieved from: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/156191/adbi-wp336.pdf
Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index, BTI. (2012). Peru Country Report. Browsed on May 19, 2026. Retrieved from:
https://btiproject.org/fileadmin/api/content/en/downloads/reports/country_report_2012_PER.pdf
Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index, BTI. (2016). Peru Country Report. Browsed on May 19, 2026. Retrieved from: https://btiproject.org/fileadmin/api/content/en/downloads/reports/country_report_2016_PER.pdf
Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index, BTI. (2018). Peru Country Report. Browsed on May 19, 2026. Retrieved from: https://btiproject.org/fileadmin/api/content/en/downloads/reports/country_report_2018_PER.pdf
Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index, BTI. (2020). Peru Country Report. Browsed on May 19, 2026. Retrieved from: https://btiproject.org/fileadmin/api/content/en/downloads/reports/country_report_2020_PER.pdf
Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index, BTI. (2022). Peru Country Report. Browsed on May 19, 2026. Retrieved from: https://btiproject.org/fileadmin/api/content/en/downloads/reports/country_report_2022_PER.pdf
Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index, BTI. (2026). Peru Country Report. Browsed on May 19, 2026. Retrieved from: https://btiproject.org/fileadmin/api/content/en/downloads/reports/country_report_2026_PER.pdf
Bleich, R. (2006). Institutional continuity and change. Policy Studies 24 (3), pp. 219-234. Browsed on May 19, 2026. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/01442870600885990
Bouzas, R. (2005). El “nuevo regionalismo” y el área de libre comercio de las Américas: un enfoque menos indulgente, Revista de la CEPAL 85, pp. 7-18. Browsed on May 15, 2026. Retrieved from: https://repositorio.cepal.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/ce2b9f5f-8164-41aa-9981-bde9b78f7650/content
Briceño Ruiz, J. (2015). Entre el voluntarismo y el realismo: el proceso revisión del modelo econímico MERCOSUR, Aldea Mundo Año 20(40)/Julio-Diciembre (2), pp. 29-39. Browsed on May 8, 2026. Retrieved from: http://erevistas.saber.ula.ve/index.php/aldeamundo/article/view/8511/8472
Chivvis, C.S., Kavanagh, J., Lauji, S., Malle, A., Orloff, S., Wertheim, S. & Wilcox, R. (2024). Strategic Change in U.S. Foreign Policy. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Browsed on July 16, 2026. Retrieved from: https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2024/07/strategic-change-us-foreign-policy
Consorcio Mexicano de Centros de Estudios de APEC, CONMEX-CEAPEC (n.d.). Nosotros: Bienvenida. Browsed on May 18, 2026. Retrieved from: https://www.conmexceapec.org/nosotros/bienvenida/
D. Medina, E. L. (2015). El modelo económico peruano: más allá de la leyenda. Revista de Economía y Derecho 9(36), pp. 51-74. Browsed on May 18, 2026. Retrieved from: https://repositorioacademico.upc.edu.pe/bitstream/handle/10757/550868/158-553-1-PB.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Dorani, S. (2018). The Bureaucratic Politics Approach: its application, its limitations, and its strengths. Political Reflection Magazine, 4(5), pp. 36-46. Browsed on July 16, 2026. Retrieved from: https://politicalreflectionmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/PR_17_SharifullahDorani.pdf
Drysdale, P., & Garnaut, R. (1993). The Pacific: An Application of a General Theory of Economic Integration. Regional Institutional Arrangements, pp. 183 - 223. Browsed on October 16, 2025. Retrieved from: http://hdl.handle.net/1885/258413
Escobar, S. (2024). Nearshoring impulsó la construcción de 150 parques industriales durante el sexenio de AMLO, EL ECONOMISTA. Browsed on May 18, 2026. Retrived from: https://www.eleconomista.com.mx/econohabitat/Nearshoring-impulso-la-construccion-de-150-parques-industriales-durante-sexenio-de-AMLO-20240812-0142.html
Estevadeordal, A. & Torrent, R. (2005). Regionalismo Global: Los dilemas para América Latina. Fundación CIDOB. Browsed on May 17, 2026. Retrieved from: https://www.cidob.org/sites/default/files/2025-02/Interrogar%20la%20Actualidad_08-REGIONALISMO%20GLOBAL.pdf
Evans, P. (1995). Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton University Press
Fatma, A. & Bharti, N. (2019). Perception vs. reality: understanding the US–China trade war. Transnational Corporations Review, 11(4), pp. 270-278. Browsed on July 15, 2026. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/19186444.2019.1682409
Gobierno de México. (2023). Textos finales del Tratado entre México, Estados Unidos y Canadá (T-MEC). Browsed on May 18, 2026. Retrieved from: https://www.gob.mx/t-mec/acciones-y-programas/textos-finales-del-tratado-entre-mexico-estados-unidos-y-canada-t-mec-202730?state=published
Gobierno de México. (2026). Tratado entre México, Estados Unidos y Canadá. Browsed on May 18. Retrieved from: https://www.gob.mx/t-mec
González de Olarte, E. (1991). Una economía bajo violencia: Perú, 1980-1990. Instituto de Estudios Peruanos (IPE), 40(14). Browsed on May 11, 2016. Retrieved from: https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/7589367d-17ee-4820-96cf-71a5cb2bc3fc/content
González, G. G. (2001). Las estrategias de política exterior de México en la era de la globalización, Foro Internacional 41(4), pp. 619-671. Browsed on May 7, 2026. Retrieved from: https://forointernacional.colmex.mx/index.php/fi/article/view/1581
González,G. G. & Velázquez, R. (2013). La política exterior de México hacia América Latina en el sexenio de Felipe Calderón (2006-2012): entre la prudencia política y el pragmatismo económico. Foro Internacional 53(3/4 (213-214)), pp. 572–618. Browsed on May 6, 2026. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23608716
González García, J. (2020). Causas, evolución y perspectivas de la guerra comercial para China. Análisis económico, 35(89), pp. 91-116. Browsed on July 14, 2026. Retrieved from: https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2448-66552020000200091
González, M.A. (2006). Perú: autoritarismo y democracia. Sobre las dificultades de la consolidación de la democracia en la América andina. El Perú de Fujimori. Browsed on May 6, 2016. Retrieve from: http://www2.congreso.gob.pe/sicr/cendocbib/con4_uibd.nsf/E774D3C35B9FCA4505257FD8005DF8ED/$FILE/ElPerudeFujimori.pdf
Halperin, M. H. (1974). Bureaucratic Politics and Foreign Policy. The Brookings Institution.
Higgott, R. (1995). APEC – A skeptical view. Routledge.
Hsieh, P. L. (2017). Reassessing the trade - development nexus in international economical law: The paradigm shift in Asia - Pacific regionalism, Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 37(3), pp. 321-369. Browsed on October 26, 2025. Retrieved from: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/2456
Huerta, H.M. & Chávez Presa, M.F. (2003). Tres modelos de política económica en México durante los últimos sesenta años. Análisis Económico 18 (37), pp. 55-88, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Azcapotzalco. Browsed on May 20, 2026. Retrieved from: https://analisiseconomico.azc.uam.mx/index.php/rae/article/view/974/716
Keohane, R. O. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press.
Keohane, R.O. & Nye, J.N. (1977). Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Cambridge University Press.
Liu, T. & Woo, W.T. (2018). Understanding the U.S.-China Trade War. China Economic Journal, 11(3), pp. 319-340. Browsed on July 14, 2026. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/17538963.2018.1516256
López Jiménez, J.J. (2015). Retos e implicaciones de la integración económica en Asia-Pacífico. Relaciones Internacionales 29, pp. 133-152. Browsed on July 14, 2026. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.15366/relacionesinternacionales2015.29.007
Ministerio de Comercio Exterior y Turismo, MINCETUR (2024). Perú y Hong Kong suscriben un Tratado de Libre Comercio. Browsed on May 13, 2026. Retrieved from: https://www.gob.pe/institucion/mincetur/noticias/1058458-peru-y-hong-kong-suscriben-un-tratado-de-libre-comercio
Ministerio de Comercio Exterior y Turismo, MINCETUR (2025a). Nuevo hito en el comercio exterior: Perú e Indonesia suscriben acuerdo comercial. Browsed on May 13, 2026. Retrieved from: https://www.gob.pe/institucion/mincetur/noticias/1224138-nuevo-hito-en-el-comercio-exterior-peru-e-indonesia-suscriben-acuerdo-comercial
Ministerio de Comercio Exterior y Turismo, MINCETUR (2025b). Reporte de Comercio Mundial: enero – diciembre 2025. Browsed on May 13, 2026. Retrieved from: https://cdn.www.gob.pe/uploads/document/file/9541635/6810672-rcml-anual-2025.pdf?v=1772555739
Ministerio de Comercio Exterior y Turismo, MINCETUR (n.d.a). Acuerdos Comerciales del Perú. Browsed on May 10, 2016. Retrieved from: https://www.acuerdoscomerciales.gob.pe/index.html
Ministerio de Comercio Exterior y Turismo, MINCETUR (n.d.b). Información Institucional. Browsed on May 13, 2026. Retrieved from: https://www.gob.pe/institucion/mincetur/institucional
Ministerio de Comercio Exterior y Turismo, MINCETUR (n.d.c). Reuniones y Actores de APEC. Browsed on May 13, 2026. Retrieved from: https://www.acuerdoscomerciales.gob.pe/En_Vigencia/APEC/Declaraciones.html
Ministerio de Economía y Finanzas, MEF (n.d.). Funciones del MEF. Browsed on May 13, 2026. Retrieved from: https://www.mef.gob.pe/es/?option=com_content&language=es-ES&Itemid=100559&lang=es-ES&view=article&id=563
Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores, RREE (n.d.). Información Institucional. Browsed on May 13, 2026. Retrieved from: https://www.gob.pe/institucion/rree/institucional
Milner, H.V. (1997). Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations. Princeton University Press.
Mundo Ejecutivo (2026). APEC 2028: México tiene oportunidad para consolidarse como hub de comercio, inversión y conectividad en Asia-Pacífico. Browsed on May 11, 2026. Retrieved from: https://mundoejecutivo.com.mx/actualidad/apec-2028-mexico-tiene-oportunidad-para-consolidarse-como-hub-de-comercio-inversion-y-conectividad-en-asia-pacifico/
Park, C.-Y., Petri, P. A., & & Plummer, M. G. (2021). The Economics of Conflict and Cooperation in the Asia-Pacific: RCEP, CPTPP and the US-China Trade War, Asian Development Bank, Economics Working Paper Series 639. Browsed on October 1st, 2025. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354964725_The_Economics_of_Conflict_and_Cooperation_in_the_Asia-Pacific_RCEP_CPTPP_and_the_US-China_Trade_War#:~:text=37:46%20PM-,ABSTRACT,%2DPacific%20Partnership%20(CPTPP)
Park, S. R. (2025). APEC Summit Sees Flurry of Deals, Uneasy U.S.-China Truce, Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada. Browsed on October, 3rd, 2025. Retrieved from: https://www.asiapacific.ca/publication/apec-summit-sees-flurry-deals-uneasy-us-china-truce
Petri, P. A., & Plummer, M. G. (2012). The Trans-Pacific Partnership and Asia - Pacific Integration: Policy Implications, Peter Institute for International Economcis, 12 (10). Browsed on October 19, 2025. Retrieved from: https://www.piie.com/publications/policy-briefs/trans-pacific-partnership-and-asia-pacific-integration-policy
Petri, P. A., & Plummer, M. G. (2020). East Asia decouples from the United States: Trade war, COVID-19, and East Asia's new trade blocs, Peterson Institute for International Economics. Browsed on November 4, 2025. Retrieved from: https://www.piie.com/publications/working-papers/east-asia-decouples-united-states-trade-war-covid-19-and-east-asias-new
Petri, P. A., Findlay, C., Plummet, M. G., & Wignajara, G. (2015). The FTAAP Opportunity: A Report to ABAC. Browsed on October 12, 2025. Retrieved from: https://www2.abaconline.org/assets/2015/4%20Manila/FTAAP%20OPPORTUNITY%20(1).pdf
Plummer, M.G. (2022). Chapther 2: Revisiting the free-trade area of the Asia-Pacific in challenging times: The way forward. State of the Region Report 2022 – 2023, PECC International Secretariat, pp. 47-57. Browsed on October 18, 2025. Retrieved from: https://www.pecc.org/state-of-the-region-report-2022-2023
Policy Support Unit, PSU (2022). Study on Tariffs: Analysis of the RCEP Tariff Liberalization Schedules. Browsed on July 14, 2026. Retrieved from: https://www.apec.org/publications/2022/05/study-on-tariffs-analysis-of-the-rcep-tariff-liberalization-schedules?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Policy Support Unit, PSU (2024). A New Look at the Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific (FTAAP): Review of APEC’s Collective Progress. Browsed on October 18, 2025. Retrieved from: https://www.apec.org/docs/default-source/publications/2024/5/224_psu_a-new-look-at-the-ftaap.pdf?sfvrsn=232741b0_2
Policy Support Unit, PSU (2025a). APEC in Charts 2025. Browsed on October 18, 2025. Retrieved from: https://www.apec.org/publications/2025/10/apec-in-charts-2025
Policy Support Unit, PSU (2025b). Study on Convergences and Divergences of Free Trade Agreements in the APEC Region. Browsed on May 30, 2026. Retrieved from: https://www.apec.org/docs/default source/publications/2024/5/224_psu_a-new-look-at-the-ftaap.pdf?sfvrsn=232741b0_2
Presidencia de la República del Perú (2016). Ejecutivo suscribió importantes acuerdos bilaterales durante visita de estado del presidente Chino a Perú. Browsed on May 15, 2026. Retrieved from: https://www.gob.pe/institucion/mincetur/institucional
Presidencia de la República (2025). Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2025 – 2030. Browsed on May 20, 2026. Retrieved from: https://www.gob.mx/presidencia/documentos/plan-nacional-de-desarrollo-2025-2030-391771
Putman, R.D. (1988). Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games, International Organization Foundation, 42(3), pp. 427-460. Browsed on May 8, 2026. Retrieved from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2706785
Rahn, W. (2025). US-China dysfunction overshadows APEC summit, Deutsche Welle. Browsed on October 3rd, 2025. Retrieved from: http://dw.com/en/us-china-dysfunction-overshadows-apec-summit/a-74555101
Ravenhill, J. (2001). APEC and the construction of Asia-Pacific Rim. Cambridge University Press.
Ravenhill, J. (2014). The Political Economy of Asia-Pacific Trade Agreements. The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of the Pacific Rim, chapter 12, pp. 314-332. Browsed on October 18, 2025. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334684239_The_Political_Economy_of_Asia-Pacific_Trade_Agreements
Ravenhill, J. (2021). Economic Interdependence, Globalization and Peaceful Change. The Oxford Handbook of Peaceful Change in International Relations, 8, pp.147-168. Browsed on July 14, 2026. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190097356.001.0001
Secretaría de Economía (2013). México conmemora 20 años de su ingreso al Foro de Cooperación Económica Asia- Pacífico (APEC). Browsed on May 11, 2026. Retrieved from: http://www.gob.mx/se/prensa/mexico-conmemora-20-anos-de-su-ingreso-al-foro-de-cooperacion-economica-asia-pacifico-apec
Secretaría de Economía (2026a). Comercio Exterior, Países con Tratados y Acuerdos firmados con México. Browsed on April 9, 2026. Retrieved from: https://www.gob.mx/se/acciones-y-programas/comercio-exterior-paises-con-tratados-y-acuerdos-firmados-con-mexico?state=published
Secretaria de Economía (2026b). Polos de Desarrollo Económico para el Bienestar. Browsed on May 20, 2026. Retrieved from: https://www.gob.mx/se/acciones-y-programas/polos-de-desarrollo-economico-para-el-bienestar
Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores (n.d). ¿Qué hacemos?. Browsed on May 11, 2026. Retrieved from: https://www.gob.mx/sre/que-hacemos
Schiavon, J.A., Velazquez, R. & Dávila, C. (2008). La paradiplomacia de las entidades federativas en México 174. Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE). Browsed on May 7, 2026. Retrieved from: http://hdl.handle.net/11651/1104
Schiavon, J.A. (2010). La diplomacia local de los gobiernos estatales en México (2000-2010). Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE). Browsed on May 7, 2026. Retrieved from: http://hdl.handle.net/11651/891
Schiavon, J.A. (2018). Capítulo 5 - La diplomacia local. Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo Leon (UANL), Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Relaciones Internacionales (FCPyRI), Asociación Mexicana de Estudios Internacionales, A.C. (AMEI). Browsed on May 7, 2026. Retrieved from: http://eprints.uanl.mx/id/eprint/14628
Schneider, B.R. (2013). Hierarchical Capitalism in Latin America: Business, Labor, and the Challenges of Equitable Development. Cambridge University Press
Schneider, C.J. (2018). The Domestic Politics of International Cooperation, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.Browsed on May 12, 2026. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.615
Schneider, J. & Randolph, E. (2025). CCP Wartime Decisionmaking: Why leaders undermine their own foreign policy. China Talk. Browsed on July 17, 2026. Retrieved from: https://open.substack.com/pub/chinatalk/p/ccp-bureaucracies-in-war?utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web
Sociedad de Comercio Exterioir del Perú, ComexPerú (2026). Nosotros: Consejo Directivo 2026-2028. Browsed on May 11, 2026. Retrieved from: https://www.comexperu.org.pe/nosotros
Stephen, M. D., & Parizek, M. (2018). New Powers and the Distribution of Preferences in Global Trade Governance: From Deadlock and Drift to Fragmentation, New Political Economy. Browsed on October 16, 2025. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2018.1509065
St John, R.B. (2017). Peruvian foreign policy in the new millennium: Continuity and change, Revista del Instituto Riva-Agüero 2(2), pp. 66-119. Browsed on May 7, 2016. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.18800/revistaira.201702.002
Tussie, D. (2009). Latin America: contrasting motivations for regional projects, Review of International Studies 35(S1), pp. 169-188. Browsed on May 15, 2026. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021050900847X
Tussie, D. (2015). Relaciones Internacionales y Economía Política Internacional: notas para el debate, Relaciones Internacionales 48. Browsed on May 15, 2026. Retrieved from: http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/46778
Uscanga Prieto, C. (2020). México ante el futuro de APEC, Anuario Asia Pacifico El Colegio de México, 1-23. Browsed on May 11, 2026. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.24201/aap.2020.305
Velázquez, R. (2007). La paradiplomacia mexicana: las relaciones exteriores de las entidades federativas. Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE). Browsed on May 7, 2026. Retrieved from: http://hdl.handle.net/11651/1079
Velázquez, R.; Schiavon, J.A.; Ortega, A.S. (2024). La política exterior de México 2024-2030: Diagnóstico y propuestas, Asociación Mexicana de Estudios Internacionales, A.C. (AMEI), de la Universidad Iberoamericana CDMX (IBERO-CDMX), y del Centro de Enseñanza y Análisis sobre la Política Exterior de México (CESPEM). Browsed on May 7, 2026. Retrieved from: https://amei.mx/biblioteca-virtual/pol-ext-mx-24-30-diagnostico-y-propuestas/
Weil, H.M. (1975), Can Bureaucracies Be Rational Actors? Foreign Policy Decision-Making in North Vietnam. International Studies Quarterly, 19(4), pp. 432–468. Browsed on July 17, 2026. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.2307/2600184
Weixing, H. (2013). Building Asia-Pacific Regional Institution: The Role of APEC, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 77 (pp. 65 – 73). Browsed on October 10, 2025. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.03.063
World Trade Organization, WTO. (n.d.a). Member Information: Mexico an the WTO. Browsed on May 4, 2026. Retrieved from: https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/countries_e/mexico_e.htm
World Trade Organization, WTO. (n.d.b). Member Information: Peru an the WTO. Browsed on May 19, 2026 Retrieved from: https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/countries_e/peru_e.htm
Yamazawa, I. (1992). On Pacific Economic Integration. The Economic Journal 102 (415), pp. 1519 - 1529. Browsed on October 10, 2025. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.2307/2234807
Yamazawa, I. (2000). APEC: Challenges and Task for the Twenty-fisrt Century. Routledge.
Yamazawa, I. (2012). APEC: New Agenda in Its Third Decade. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Yanai, A. (2000). APEC and the WTO: Seeking Opportunities for Cooperation, APEC Study Center - Institute of Developing Economies 99(2). Browsed on October 24, 2025. Retrieved from: https://www.ide.go.jp/library/English/Publish/Reports/Apec/pdf/1999_07.pdf