跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃欣卉
Huang, Hsin-Hui
論文名稱: 混合縱向因素分析與滯後中介模型:臺灣鄉鎮市區所得差距的異質性研究
Mixture of Longitudinal Factor Analyzers and Lagged Mediation: Heterogeneous Regional Income Disparity in Taiwan’s Townships
指導教授: 鄭宗記
Cheng, Tsung-Chi
口試委員: 張軒瑜
Chang, Hsuan-Yu
李文傑
LEE, WEN-CHIEH
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 商學院 - 統計學系
Department of Statistics
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 67
中文關鍵詞: 混合縱向因素分析模型時間滯後中介分析線性混合效應模型資源錯置收益全要素生產力聚集經濟區域所得差距
外文關鍵詞: Mixture of Longitudinal Factor Analyzers (MLFA), Lagged Mediation Analysis, Linear Mixed-Effects Model, Resource Misallocation, Revenue Total Factor Productivity (TFPR), Agglomeration Economies, Regional Income Disparity
相關次數: 點閱:20下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究探討收益全要素生產力(revenue total factor productivity,TFPR)相對水準與工商業總家數如何透過固定資產淨額與薪資費用兩個中介變數,連結至臺灣鄉鎮市區的所得中位數。傳統靜態分群(static clustering)與橫斷面迴歸(cross-sectional regression)難以在同一模型內處理群組間的測量結構異質性、縱向資料的時間相依性,以及要素投入與所得之間可能存在的滯後關聯。
    本研究以 2011 至 2022 年鄉鎮市區縱向行政資料為基礎,分兩階段進行分析。第一階段採用混合縱向因素分析模型(mixture of longitudinal factor analyzers,MLFA)進行縱向分群,允許各潛在群組擁有獨立因素結構,並萃取潛在因素分數作為控制變數。第二階段建構以線性混合效應模型為基礎的單期滯後中介模型,以 TFPR 與工商業總家數為自變數,以固定資產淨額與薪資費用為中介變數,所得中位數為結果變數。
    實證結果顯示,TFPR 與固定資產淨額呈顯著負向關聯,但其透過固定資產或薪資費用形成的間接效應於主要 Lag-1 設定下未達顯著。此結果反映區域收益生產力差異與資本配置之間未能一致。相較之下,工商業總家數與所得中位數之間存在明顯正向直接關聯,但其透過薪資費用形成的間接效應為負,顯示廠商端薪資費用增加未必同步反映於家戶端所得中位數。逐年估計進一步顯示,部分中介路徑的估計值隨年份改變,呈現時間異質性。
    本研究發現工商業總家數與所得中位數之間的關聯較 TFPR 中介路徑更為明顯,TFPR 相關結果則提示區域收益生產力差異與資本配置之間可能未能一致。薪資費用路徑的負向間接效應顯示產業聚集導向的政策若僅著重工商業總家數,未必能保證其利益反映於一般家戶所得。


    This study examines how the relative level of revenue total factor productivity (TFPR) and the number of commercial and industrial establishments are linked to median income across Taiwan’s townships through two mediators: fixed assets and wage expenditure. Conventional static clustering and cross-sectional regressions cannot jointly accommodate measurement-structure heterogeneity across groups, temporal dependence in longitudinal data, and possible lagged associations between factor inputs and income.
    Using longitudinal administrative data for Taiwan’s townships from 2011 to 2022, this study proceeds in two stages. The first stage applies the mixture of longitudinal factor analyzers (MLFA) to perform longitudinal clustering, allowing each latent group to have a distinct factor structure and extracting latent factor scores as control variables. The second stage constructs a one-period lagged mediation model based on linear mixed-effects models. Revenue total factor productivity (TFPR) and the number of commercial and industrial establishments serve as independent variables, while fixed assets and wage expenditure serve as mediators and median income as the outcome.
    The empirical results show that TFPR is significantly and negatively associated with fixed assets, but its indirect effects through fixed assets or wage expenditure are not significant under the main Lag-1 specification. This finding suggests that regional differences in revenue productivity are not fully aligned with capital allocation. In contrast, the number of commercial and industrial establishments has a clear positive direct association with median income, whereas its indirect effect through wage expenditure is negative, suggesting that increases in firm-side wage expenditure do not necessarily translate into higher household-side median income. Wave-by-wave estimation further indicates that some mediation-path estimates vary across years, revealing temporal heterogeneity.
    Overall, this study finds that local commercial and industrial activity is more strongly associated with median income than the TFPR-mediated pathways. The TFPR-related results suggest a possible misalignment between regional revenue productivity and capital allocation. The negative wage-mediated indirect effect indicates that agglomeration-oriented policies focusing solely on the scale of local business activity may not guarantee that agglomeration gains are reflected in ordinary household income.

    摘要 i
    Abstract iii
    目錄 v
    表目錄 viii
    圖目錄 ix
    縮寫對照表 x
    第一章 緒論 1
    1.1 研究動機 1
    1.2 研究目的 2
    第二章 文獻回顧 4
    2.1 縱向資料分析與動態分群方法 4
    2.2 縱向因素分析混合模型 5
    2.2.1 縱向因素分析 5
    2.2.2 MLFA 模型架構與測量不變性 5
    2.2.3 分群品質評估方法 6
    2.3 線性混合效應模型與縱向中介分析 10
    2.3.1 線性混合效應模型 10
    2.3.2 中介分析的理論基礎 10
    2.3.3 以 LMM 為基礎的縱向中介分析 11
    2.3.4 時間交互作用與逐年趨勢分析 12
    2.4 資源錯置理論 13
    2.4.1 資源錯置的概念基礎 13
    2.4.2 TFPR 與區域所得差距 13
    2.4.3 聚集經濟 14
    第三章 研究方法 16
    3.1 混合縱向因素分析模型 16
    3.1.1 測量模型 16
    3.1.2 結構模型 17
    3.1.3 EM 演算法 18
    3.1.4 識別條件 19
    3.1.5 模型選擇 20
    3.2 對照分群方法 20
    3.2.1 成長曲線 k-means 20
    3.2.2 潛在類別混合模型 21
    3.3 TFPR 測量模型 23
    3.4 線性混合效應中介分析 26
    3.4.1 中介模型設定 27
    3.4.2 蒙地卡羅信賴區間 29
    第四章 實證分析 30
    4.1 資料來源、變數選取與 MLFA 結果 30
    4.1.1 資料來源與前處理 30
    4.1.2 模型選擇 31
    4.1.3 潛在因素命名與詮釋 32
    4.2 分群品質評估 33
    4.2.1 分群品質量化指標 33
    4.2.2 跨方法分群結構比較 35
    4.2.3 與既有發展分類對照 40
    4.3 中介模型結果 42
    4.3.1 實證模型設定 43
    4.3.2 中介變數模型估計 45
    4.3.3 結果變數模型估計 47
    4.3.4 中介效應與機制詮釋 48
    4.3.5 逐年趨勢 49
    第五章 結論與建議 52
    5.1 研究發現 52
    5.2 貢獻與政策意涵 52
    5.3 限制與未來方向 53
    參考文獻 55
    MLFA 之 EM 演算法封閉形式更新公式 65
    .1 完整資料對數概似 65
    .2 E-step:條件期望之計算 65
    .3 M-step:封閉形式參數更新 66
    .3.1 混合比例 πc 66
    .3.2 因素負荷矩陣 Λc 66
    .3.3 測量誤差變異數 σ2jc 67
    .3.4 固定效果參數 βc 67
    .3.5 隨機效果共變異矩陣 Σξc 67
    .3.6 結構誤差共變異矩陣 Σωc 67
    .4 收斂判準 67

    Adler, G., Duval, R. A., Furceri, D., Çelik, S. K., Koloskova, K., and Poplawski-Ribeiro, M. (2017). Gone with the headwinds: Global productivity. IMF Staff Discussion Note SDN/17/04, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.
    Alviarez, V., Cravino, J., and Ramondo, N. (2023). Firm-embedded productivity and cross-country income differences. Journal of Political Economy, 131(9):2289–2327.
    An, X., Yang, Q., and Bentler, P. M. (2013). A latent factor linear mixed model for high-dimensional longitudinal data analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 32(24):4229–4239.
    Anderson, T. W. (2003). An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 3 edition.
    Angrist, J. D. and Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
    Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
    Autor, D., Dorn, D., Katz, L. F., Patterson, C., and Van Reenen, J. (2020). The fall of the labor share and the rise of superstar firms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(2):645–709.
    Banerjee, A. and Moll, B. (2010). Why does misallocation persist? American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(1):189–206.
    Banerjee, A. V. and Duflo, E. (2005). Growth theory through the lens of development economics. In Aghion, P. and Durlauf, S. N., editors, Handbook of Economic Growth, volume 1, chapter 7, pages 473–552. Elsevier.
    Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6):1173–1182.
    Barro, R. J. and Sala-i Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100(2):223–251.
    Bartholomew, D. J., Knott, M., and Moustaki, I. (2011). Latent Variable Models and Factor Analysis: A Unified Approach. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 3 edition.
    Bauer, D. J., Preacher, K. J., and Gil, K. M. (2006). Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 11(2):142–163.
    Bils, M., Klenow, P. J., and Ruane, C. (2021). Misallocation or mismeasurement? Journal of Monetary Economics, 124:S39–S56.
    Bollen, K. A. and Curran, P. J. (2006). Latent Curve Models: A Structural Equation Perspective. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
    Brandt, L., Tombe, T., and Zhu, X. (2013). Factor market distortions across time, space and sectors in China. Review of Economic Dynamics, 16(1):39–58.
    Brunner, E., Dette, H., and Munk, A. (1997). Box-type approximations in nonparametric factorial designs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92(440):1494–1502.
    Buera, F. J. and Shin, Y. (2013). Financial frictions and the persistence of history: A quantitative exploration. Journal of Political Economy, 121(2):221–272.
    Cole, D. A. and Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4):558–577.
    Combes, P.-P. and Gobillon, L. (2015). The empirics of agglomeration economies. In Duranton, G., Henderson, J. V., and Strange, W. C., editors, Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, volume 5A, pages 247–348. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
    Dabla-Norris, E., Kersting, E. K., and Verdier, G. (2012). Firm productivity, innovation, and financial development. Southern Economic Journal, 79(2):422–449.
    Delattre, M., Lavielle, M., and Poursat, M.-A. (2014). A note on BIC in mixed-effects models. Electronic Journal of Statistics, 8(1):456–475.
    Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., and Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39(1):1–38.
    Den Teuling, N. G. P., Pauws, S. C., and van den Heuvel, E. R. (2023). A comparison of methods for clustering longitudinal data with slowly changing trends. Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation, 52(3):621–648.
    Diggle, P. J., Heagerty, P., Liang, K.-Y., and Zeger, S. L. (2002). Analysis of Longitudinal Data. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2 edition.
    Ellison, G. and Glaeser, E. L. (1997). Geographic concentration in U.S. manufacturing industries: A dartboard approach. Journal of Political Economy, 105(5):889–927.
    Engle, R. F. and Watson, M. W. (1981). A one-factor multivariate time series model of metropolitan wage rates. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76(376):774–781.
    Fitzmaurice, G. M., Laird, N. M., and Ware, J. H. (2011). Applied Longitudinal Analysis. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2 edition.
    Friedmann, J. (1966). Regional Development Policy: A Case Study of Venezuela. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
    Friedrich, S., Konietschke, F., and Pauly, M. (2019). Resampling-based analysis of multivariate data and repeated measures designs with the R package MANOVA.RM. The R Journal, 11(2):380–400.
    Friedrich, S. and Pauly, M. (2018). MATS: Inference for potentially singular and heteroscedastic MANOVA. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 165:166–179.
    Gandhi, A., Navarro, S., and Rivers, D. A. (2020). On the identification of gross output production functions. Journal of Political Economy, 128(8):2973–3016.
    Glaeser, E. L., Kallal, H. D., Scheinkman, J. A., and Shleifer, A. (1992). Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 100(6):1126–1152.
    Goldstein, H. (2011). Multilevel Statistical Models. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. Wiley, Chichester, UK, 4 edition.
    Hall, R. E. and Jones, C. I. (1999). Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1):83–116.
    Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford Press, New York.
    Heywood, H. B. (1931). On finite sequences of real numbers. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 134(824):486–501.
    Hirschfeld, G. and von Brachel, R. (2014). Multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis in R — a tutorial in measurement invariance with continuous and ordinal indicators. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 19(7):1–12.
    Hsieh, C.-T. and Klenow, P. J. (2009). Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(4):1403–1448.
    Hsieh, C.-T. and Moretti, E. (2019). Housing constraints and spatial misallocation. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 11(2):1–39.
    Hubert, L. and Arabie, P. (1985). Comparing partitions. Journal of Classification, 2(1):193–218.
    Jennrich, R. I. and Sampson, P. F. (1966). Rotation for simple loadings. Psychometrika, 31(3):313–323.
    Johansen, S. (1980). The Welch–James approximation to the distribution of the residual sum of squares in a weighted linear regression. Biometrika, 67(1):85–92.
    Johnson, R. A. and Wichern, D. W. (2002). Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 5 edition.
    Kass, R. E. and Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(430):773–795.
    Kim, E. S., Cao, C., Wang, Y., and Nguyen, D. T. (2017). Measurement invariance testing with many groups: A comparison of five approaches. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24(4):524–544.
    Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford Press, New York, 4 edition.
    Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3):483–499.
    Laird, N. M. and Ware, J. H. (1982). Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics, 38(4):963–974.
    Lazarsfeld, P. F. and Henry, N. W. (1968). Latent Structure Analysis. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.
    Little, R. J. A. and Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. Wiley, New York, 2 edition.
    Lloyd, S. P. (1982). Least squares quantization in PCM. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 28(2):129–137.
    MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
    MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., and Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58:593–614.
    MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., and Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1(4):173–181.
    MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., and Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1):99–128.
    MacQueen, J. B. (1967). Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, volume 1, pages 281–297, Berkeley, CA. University of California Press.
    Mammen, E. (1993). Bootstrap and wild bootstrap for high dimensional linear models. The Annals of Statistics, 21(1):255–285.
    Marquardt, D. W. (1963). An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 11(2):431–441.
    Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics. Macmillan, London.
    McLachlan, G. J., Peel, D., and Bean, R. W. (2003). Modelling high-dimensional data by mixtures of factor analyzers. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 41(3–4):379–388.
    Meredith, W. and Horn, J. (2001). The role of factorial invariance in modeling growth and change. In Collins, L. M. and Sayer, A. G., editors, New Methods for the Analysis of Change, pages 203–240. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
    Midrigan, V. and Xu, D. Y. (2014). Finance and misallocation: Evidence from plant-level data. American Economic Review, 104(2):422–458.
    Mitchell, T. R. and James, L. R. (2001). Building better theory: Time and the specification of when things happen. Academy of Management Review, 26(4):530–547.
    Moll, B. (2014). Productivity losses from financial frictions: Can self-financing undo capital misallocation? American Economic Review, 104(10):3186–3221.
    Nagin, D. S. (2005). Group-Based Modeling of Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
    Ostry, J. D., Berg, A., and Tsangarides, C. G. (2014). Redistribution, inequality, and growth. IMF Staff Discussion Note SDN/14/02, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.
    Ounajim, A., Slaoui, Y., Louis, P.-Y., Billot, M., Frasca, D., and Rigoard, P. (2023). Mixture of longitudinal factor analyzers and their application to the assessment of chronic pain. Statistics in Medicine, 42(18):3259–3282.
    Parente, S. L. and Prescott, E. C. (1994). Barriers to technology adoption and development. Journal of Political Economy, 102(2):298–321.
    Parente, S. L. and Prescott, E. C. (1999). Monopoly rights: A barrier to riches. American Economic Review, 89(5):1216–1233.
    Pinheiro, J. C. and Bates, D. M. (2000). Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS. Springer, New York.
    Preacher, K. J. and Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4):717–731.
    Preacher, K. J. and Selig, J. P. (2012). Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects. Communication Methods and Measures, 6(2):77–98.
    Proust, C., Jacqmin-Gadda, H., Taylor, J. M. G., Ganiayre, J., and Commenges, D. (2006). A nonlinear model with latent process for cognitive evolution using multivariate longitudinal data. Biometrics, 62(4):1014–1024.
    Proust-Lima, C., Philipps, V., and Liquet, B. (2017). Estimation of extended mixed models using latent classes and latent processes: The R package lcmm. Journal of Statistical Software, 78(2):1–56.
    Ramaswamy, V., DeSarbo, W. S., Reibstein, D. J., and Robinson, W. T. (1993). An empirical pooling approach for estimating marketing mix elasticities with PIMS data. Marketing Science, 12(1):103–124.
    Raudenbush, S. W. and Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2 edition.
    Restuccia, D. and Rogerson, R. (2008). Policy distortions and aggregate productivity with heterogeneous establishments. Review of Economic Dynamics, 11(4):707–720.
    Rijnhart, J. J. M., Twisk, J. W. R., Valente, M. J., and Heymans, M. W. (2022). Time lags and time interactions in mixed effects models impacted longitudinal mediation effect estimates. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 151:143–150.
    Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2018). The revenge of the places that don't matter (and what to do about it). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1):189–209.
    Rohrer, J. M. (2018). Thinking clearly about correlations and causation: Graphical causal models for observational data. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1):27–42.
    Rosenthal, S. S. and Strange, W. C. (2004). Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. In Henderson, J. V. and Thisse, J.-F., editors, Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, volume 4, pages 2119–2171. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
    Rousseeuw, P. J. (1987). Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20:53–65.
    Roy, J. and Lin, X. (2000). Latent variable models for longitudinal data with multiple continuous outcomes. Biometrics, 56(4):1047–1054.
    Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2):461–464.
    Selig, J. P. and Preacher, K. J. (2009). Mediation models for longitudinal data in developmental research. Research in Human Development, 6(2–3):144–164.
    Singer, J. D. and Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence. Oxford University Press, New York.
    Snijders, T. A. B. and Bosker, R. J. (2012). Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. Sage Publications, London, 2 edition.
    Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13:290–312.
    Spearman, C. (1904). "General Intelligence," objectively determined and measured. The American Journal of Psychology, 15(2):201–292.
    Stephens, M. (2000). Dealing with label switching in mixture models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 62(4):795–809.
    Vandenberg, R. J. and Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1):4–70.
    VanderWeele, T. J. (2015). Explanation in Causal Inference: Methods for Mediation and Interaction. Oxford University Press, New York.
    Verbeke, G. and Molenberghs, G. (2000). Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York.
    Wald, A. (1943). Tests of statistical hypotheses concerning several parameters when the number of observations is large. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 54(3):426–482.
    Ward, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(301):236–244.
    Wu, C. F. J. (1983). On the convergence properties of the EM algorithm. The Annals of Statistics, 11(1):95–103.
    Wu, C. F. J. (1986). Jackknife, bootstrap and other resampling methods in regression analysis. The Annals of Statistics, 14(4):1261–1295.
    侯佩君 (2024). 臺灣鄉鎮市區分層研究. Technical report, 中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心.
    劉介宇等 (2006). 台灣地區鄉鎮市區發展類型應用於大型健康調查抽樣設計之研究. 健康管理學刊, 4(1):1–22.
    劉介宇等 (2026). 更新版臺灣地區鄉鎮發展類型於大型健康調查之抽樣設計之應用. 中國統計學報, 64(2):232–258.

    無法下載圖示 全文公開日期 2031/07/20
    QR CODE
    :::