隨著直播平台逐漸發展成多元且高度互動的生態系，理解平台、用戶與主播之間價值共創的形成機制變得日益重要。本研究採用微觀基礎觀點，探討具影響力的平台機制——如登入獎勵機制、任務導向機制與多樣的社群機制——如何影響用戶與主播間的互動與價值共創行為。透過對台灣兩大直播平台——17Live與LangLive——的觀察與個案分析，本研究揭示了宏觀層次與微觀層次互動之間的關聯，並進一步指出不同平台在營運策略與機制設計上的差異，如何導致兩個層次上呈現出不同的結果導向。研究發現指出，兩家平台在機制設計上的主要差異可歸納為三個面向：平台黏著力的來源、用戶與主播的分群機制設計，以及雙向的任務系統。這些差異顯著影響了用戶與主播的參與動機、互動強度，以及價值共創的模式，進而在多個層面上形塑了平台各自的營運優勢。

As live streaming platforms evolve toward increasingly diverse and highly interactive ecosystems, understanding the formation of value co-creation among platforms, users, and streamers has become increasingly important. This study adopts a microfoundation perspective to examine how influential platform mechanisms—such as login reward mechanisms, task-based mechanisms, and various community mechanisms—affect the interactions and value co-creation behaviors between users and streamers. Through observation and secondary case analysis of two leading Taiwanese live streaming platforms, 17Live and LangLive, this research uncovers the connections between macro-level and micro-level interactions. It further reveals how differing operational approaches and mechanism designs across platforms can lead to distinct outcome orientations at both levels. The findings indicate that the primary differences in mechanism design between the two platforms can be categorized into three aspects: sources of platform stickiness, user and streamer segmentation mechanism design, and bidirectional task systems. These distinctions significantly influence user and streamer participation motivations, the intensity of their interactions, and patterns of value co-creation—ultimately shaping the platforms’ respective operational advantages across multiple dimensions.

Ask, K., Spilker, H. S., & Hansen, M. (2019). The politics of user-platform relationships: Co-scripting live-streaming on Twitch.tv. First Monday, 24(7).

Ambos, T. C., Andersson, U., Drogendijk, R., Lunnan, R., Sharkey Scott, P., & Yildiz, H. E. (2025). Revealing the promise of microfoundations for international business research: A modular approach. Journal of World Business, 60(2), 101610.

Barney, J., & Felin, T. (2013). (2013). What are microfoundations?. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(2), 138-155.

Barrett, G., & Tsekouras, G. (2022). A tango with a gorilla: An exploration of the microfoundations of open innovation partnerships between young innovative companies and multi-national enterprises. Technovation, 117, 102561.

Bertello, A., De Bernardi, P., Santoro, G., & Quaglia, R. (2022). Unveiling the microfoundations of multiplex boundary work for collaborative innovation. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1424–1434.

Bründl, S., Matt, C., Hess, T., & Engert, S. (2022). How synchronous participation affects the willingness to subscribe to social live streaming services: The role of co-interactive behavior on Twitch. European Journal of Information Systems, 32(5), 800–817.

Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.

Chen, N., & Yang, Y. (2023). The Role of Influencers in Live Streaming E-Commerce: Influencer Trust, Attachment, and Consumer Purchase Intention. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 18(3), 1601-1618.

Chirumalla, K., Leoni, L., & Oghazi, P. (2023). Moving from servitization to digital servitization: Identifying the required dynamic capabilities and related microfoundations to facilitate the transition. Journal of Business Research, 158, 113668.

Chen, X., Ji, L., Jiang, L., & Huang, J. T. (2023). The bright side of emotional extremity: Evidence from tipping in live streaming platform. Information & Management, 60(1), 103726.

De Vasconcellos, S. L., Parente, R. C., Schotter, A. P. J., Lapuente Garrido, I., & Reis Gonçalo, C. (2024). Organizational creativity: A microfoundation of the international business competence and performance link. Journal of International Management, 30(6), 101203.

Elster, J. (1989). Nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

Foss, N. (2003). Bounded rationality and tacit knowledge in the organizational capabilities approach. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(2), 185-201.

Felin, T., & Foss, N. (2005). Strategic organization: A field in search of micro-foundations. Strategic Organization, 3(4), 441-455.

Foss, N. J., & Pedersen, T. (2019). Microfoundations in international management research: The case of knowledge sharing in multinational corporations. The Journal of International Business Studies, 50, 1594-1621.

Felin, T., Foss, N. J., & Ployhart, R. E. (2015). The Microfoundations Movement in Strategy and Organization Theory. The Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 575-632.

Gavetti, G. (2005). Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities’ development. Organization Science, 16, 599-617.

Ghose, A., Mayya, R., & Yu, P. (2023). Do non-monetary virtual gifts enhance or diminish voluntary paid gifts? Evidence from a video game live streaming platform. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Hu, M., Zhang, M., & Wang, Y. (2017).Why do audiences choose to keep watching on live video streaming platforms? An explanation of dual identification framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 594-606.

Hou, F., Guan, Z., Li, B., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2020). Factors influencing people’s continuous watching intention and consumption intention in live streaming: Evidence from China. Internet Research, 30(1), 141–163.

He, D., Yao, Z., Tang, P., & Ma, Y. (2023). Impacts of different interactions on viewers’ sense of virtual community: An empirical study of live streaming platform. Behaviour & Information Technology, 42(7), 940–960.

Iden, J., & Bygstad, B. (2024). Sociotechnical micro-foundations for digital transformation. European Journal of Information Systems, 34(2), 367–382.

Leonard-Barton, D. (1990). A dual methodology for case studies: Syn-ergistic use of a longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites. Organization Science, 1(3), 248–266.

LANG_INC. (n.d.). Hsu-Jui Culture – LANG LIVE. Retrieved April 9, 2025, from https://langinc.com.tw/%e6%97%ad%e7%91%9e%e6%96%87%e5%8c%96-%e6%b5%aalive/

LANG_INC. (2024). Institutional Investor Presentation. Retrieved August 29, 2024, from https://langinc.com.tw/%E6%B3%95%E4%BA%BA%E8%AA%AA%E6%98%8E%E6%9C%83%E7%9B%B8%E9%97%9C%E8%B3%87%E8%A8%8A/

Lippman, S. A., & Rumelt, R. (2003a). The payments perspective: Micro-foundations of resource analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 903-927.

Lippman, S. A., & Rumelt, R. (2003b). A bargaining perspective on resource advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 24(11), 1069-1086.

Li, R., Lu, Y., Ma, J., & Wang, W. (2020). Examining gifting behavior on live streaming platforms: An identity-based motivation model. Information & Management, 58(6), 103406.

Liu, H., Tan, K. H., Kumar, A., Singh, S. K., & Chung, L. (2022). Value Co-creation in Sports Live Streaming Platforms: A Microfoundations Perspective. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 12674-12685.

Patroni, J., von Briel, F., & Recker, J. (2022). Unpacking the social media–driven innovation capability: How consumer conversations turn into organizational innovations. Information & Management, 59(3), 103267.

Teece, D. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1319-1350.

We Are Social, & Meltwater. (2024). Digital 2024 Taiwan. Retrieved from https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-taiwan

Wang, F., Chu, Y., & Yan, Z. (2024). A study on the factors influencing the consumption of virtual gifts on a live streaming platform based on virtual badges and user interaction. Electronic Commerce Research. Advance online publication.

Wójcik, P., Obłój, K., & Buono, A. F. (2022). Addressing social concern through business-nonprofit collaboration: Microfoundations of a firm’s dynamic capability for social responsibility. Journal of Business Research, 143, 119–139.

Wu, Y., Niu, G., Chen, Z., & Zhang, D. (2022). Purchasing social attention by tipping: Materialism predicts online tipping in live‐streaming platform through self‐enhancement motive. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 21(3), 468–480.

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Yang, X., Gou, Q., Wang, X., & Zhang, J. (2022). Does bonus motivate streamers to perform better? An analysis of compensation mechanisms for live streaming platforms. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 164, 102758.

Zhang, R. (2024). Shedding the “sexy live stream” label: How 17LIVE reversed losses in one year and became Asia’s largest live platform. Business Today Taiwan. Retrieved from https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/183016/post/202401030002/

Zhu, T., Lu, Y., & Gupta, S. (2024). Investigating factors influencing viewers' continued participation in live streaming: From a socio-technical perspective. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 23(3), 344–375.

Zhao, K., Hu, Y., Hong, Y., & Westland, J. C. (2019). Understanding characteristics of popular streamers on live streaming platforms: evidence from Twitch. tv. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 22(4).

Zhou, J. L., Zhou, J., Zhou, Y., & Wang, H. S. (2019). The magic of danmaku: a social interaction perspective of gift sending on live streaming platforms. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 34, 100815.

17Live. (n.d.). About 17LIVE. Retrieved April 8, 2025, from https://about.17.live/about/

17Live. (2025). Annual report FY2024. Retrieved April 7, 2025, from https://about.17.live/investor-relations/

17Live. (2024). 17LIVE announces 2023 financial report, with gross margin growth to 41.2% and operating profit increase of 35.8%. Retrieved February 28, 2024, from https://about.17.live/pressrelease/17live-%e5%85%ac%e5%b8%832023%e5%b9%b4%e8%b2%a1%e5%a0%b1%e3%80%80%e6%af%9b%e5%88%a9%e5%a2%9e%e9%95%b7%e8%87%b341-2-%e3%80%81%e7%87%9f%e6%a5%ad%e5%88%a9%e6%bd%a4%e6%8f%90%e9%ab%9835-8/?lang=zh-hant