跳到主要內容

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林季陽
Lin,Chi-Yang
論文名稱: Strategic Trade Policy and Exchange Rate Subsidies: A Study of American Auto Markets
指導教授: 張元晨
Chang,Yuanchen
溫偉任
Wen,Wei-Jen
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 商學院 - 財務管理學系
Department of Finance
論文出版年: 2005
畢業學年度: 94
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 56
中文關鍵詞: 外匯干預汽車業匯率預期
外文關鍵詞: peso problem
相關次數: 點閱:211下載:33
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • Can intervention by the Bank of Japan on the yen/dollar rates be used as a strategic policy to promote Japanese exports to the U.S. markets? We develop theoretical models based on strategic trade policy literature to explain possible impacts on U.S. automobiles. During the last decade, the changes of yen/dollar rates have coincided with dramatic market-share gains by Japanese automakers in the U.S. market. In the meantime, intervention by the Bank of Japan on the yen/dollar market has reached a record high. Our models assume interventions have two channels to influence U.S./Japan trade. First, we hypothesize that official currency manipulation by the Bank of Japan was implemented as a means to subsidize Japanese. The second channel resulted from the relationship between the expectation of an unavoidable foreign exchange rate appreciation and automobile purchase behavior of U.S. consumers. We assembles the famous “peso problem” in international finance. By preventing the prompt appreciation of JPY using intervention strategy, we argue that intervention by the Bank of Japan create a notion of unavoidable appreciation of JPY rate. This prompts U.S. consumers to purchase cars earlier.
    We explore the effects of intervention of Bank of Japan on the changes of sale volume and market shares of U.S. and Japan automakers and the results show that the sale volume and market share of American automakers decrease while these of Japanese automakers increase. Empirical results also indicate that U.S. consumers tend to purchase more Japanese automobiles when the Yen’s appreciation is withheld temporary level they have expected. After comparisons, we conclude that interventions by the Bank of Japan affect American automakers through cost disadvantage and Japanese automakers through another channel. Results also imply that the effects of intervention on Japan/U.S. trade lie more through the channel of cost subsidy.


    Abstract Ⅴ
    List of Figures Ⅵ
    List of Tables Ⅶ
    Chapter 1. Introduction 1
    1.1. Motivations of the study 1
    1.2. Objectives of the study 3
    1.3. Chapter outlines 4
    Chapter 2. Literature Review 5
    2.1. International trade relationship and history between Japan and the America. 5
    2.1.1. The history about trade history between Japan and the United Stated. 5
    2.1.2. Industry Structure in the United States and Japan 6
    2.2. Exchange rate pass-through 7
    2.3. Strategic trade policy 9
    2.3.1. Definition and content of strategic trade policy 9
    2.3.2. Strategic trade policy and Japan 10
    2.3.3. Exchange Rate Intervention as a strategic trade policy tool 11
    2.4. Automobile consumption behavior 13
    2.5. Peso problem hypothesis 13
    2.5.1. Definition of the “peso problem” 13
    2.5.2. Major applications of the “peso problem” 14
    2.6. Exchange rate expectation 15
    Chapter 3 Research Methodology and Data Description 16
    3.1. Methodology for the impact of official exchange rate intervention on U.S. auto sales 17
    3.1.1. Model framework 17
    3.1.2. Cournot-Nash equilibrium and comparative statics 20
    3.2. Methodology for the impact of expectation of exchange rate 22
    3.2.1. Model framework 22
    3.2.2. Cournot-Nash equilibrium and comparative statics 23
    3.3. Hypotheses 25
    3.4. Data Description  25
    3.4.1. Data of Automobile sales in the U.S. market 27
    3.4.2. Data of Macroeconomic variables 28
    Chapter 4 Empirical Results of impacts of official intervention on the auto sales 30
    4.1. The Inverse Demand Function and Substitution Relationship 30
    4.2. Impact of Official Intervention on the sales of Automakers 32
    4.3. Impact of Official Intervention on the market shares of Automakers 35
    Chapter 5 Empirical Results of impacts of exchange rate expectation on auto sales 37
    5.1. The Adjusted Inverse Demand Function 37
    5.2. Impact of Exchage Rate Expectation to the Sales 39
    5.3. Comparison of the Two Channels of impacts of Intervention on Sales 42
    Chapter 6 Summary and Conclusions 45
    6.1. Summary of This Study 45
    6.2. Suggestions for Future Research 46
    Appendices 47
    Appendix A. Descriptive statistics and figures of data 47
    Appendix B. Unit root test 48
    Appendix C. Proof in Section 3.3 and 3.3 49
    Appendix C.1 The value of determinant D 49
    Appendix C.2 The proof of equation (6), (6’) and (6’’) 49
    Appendix C.3 The proof of equation (11), (11’) and (11’’) 50
    Appendix D. Proof in Section 3.3 and 3.3 51
    Bibliography 53

    [1] Abel, Andrew B. 2002. An Exploration of the Effects of Pessimism and Doubt on Asset Returns. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 26.7-8:1075-1092
    [2] Barber, Brad M., Reid W. Click and Masako N. Darrough. 1999. The impact of shocks to exchange rates and oil prices on U.S. sales of American and Japanese automakers. Japan and World Economy 11:57-93.
    [3] Brainard, S. Lael and David Martimort. 1997. Strategic trade policy with incompletely informed policymakers. Journal of International Economics 42:33-65.
    [4] Bergin, Paul R. 2003. Devaluations and Consumption Smoothing. Review of International Economics 11(5):875–884.
    [5] Bernhofen, Danial M. and Peng Xu. 2000. Exchange rates and market power:evidence from the petrochemical industry. Journal of International Economics 52:283-297.
    [6] Berry, Steven, James Levinsohn, and Ariel Pakes. 1999, Voluntary Export Restraints on Automobiles:Evaluating a Trade Policy. The American Economic Review 89 No.3:400-430.
    [7] Corsetti, Giancarlo., Paolo Pesenti, Nouriel Roubini and Cedric Tille. 2000. Competitive devaluations: toward a welfare-based approach. Journal of International Economics 51:217-241
    [8] Eaton, J. and G.M Grossman. 1986. Optimal trade and industrial policy under oligopoly. Journal of Economics 51: 383.
    [9] Enomoto, Carl. E and Kenichiro Chinen. 2001. Public perceptions of U.S.-Japan trade relations in the 1990s. Multinational Business Review 9: 1257-1292.
    [10] Fang, K.C., Hitomi Iizaka, Paul Lau and Chelsea Lin. 2002. The Political Economy of the Japanese Yen and the U.S.-Japan Trade Conflict. Journal of Finance 55: 2017-2070.
    [11] Fratzscher, Marcel. 2004. COMMUNICATION AND EXCHANGE RATE POLICY. European Central Bank working paper No.363.
    [12] Feenstra, Robert C. 2004. Advanced International Trade –THEORY AND EVIDENCE. Princeton University Press.
    [13] Feenstra Robert C., Joseph E. Gagnon and Michael M. Knetter. 1996. Market share and exchange rate pass-through in world automobile trade. Journal of International Economics 40:187-207.
    [14] Frenkel, Michael., Christian Pierdziochb and Georg Stadtmann. 2005. The effects of Japanese foreign exchange market interventions on the yen/U.S. dollar exchange rate volatility. International Review of Economics and Finance 14:27–39.
    [15] Giovanni, Olivei P. 2002. Exchange rates and the prices of manufacturing products imported into the United States. New England Economic Review 2002: 27-47.
    [16] Goldberg, Pinelopi Koujianou. 1995. Product Differentiation and Oligopoly in International Markets: The Case of the U.S. Automobile Industry. Journal of Econometrica 63 No.4:891-951.
    [17] Goldberg, Michael D. and Roman Frydman. 2001. Macroeconomic fundamentals and the DM/$ exchange rate: Temporal instability and the monetary model. International Journal of Finance & Economics 6. 4:421-435.
    [18] Huang, Jui-Chi and Tantatape Brahmasrene. 2003. The effect of exchange rate expectations on market share commendation. Managerial Finance 29.1:101-127.
    [19] Johnson, Bryan T. and O’Quinn, Robert P. 1995. The U.S.-Japan Trade Agreement: A Failure for Clinton, A Victory for America., Cornell University, and University of Illinois working paper.
    [20] Kaminsky, Graciela. 1993. Is There a Peso Problem Evidence from the Dollar Pound Exchange Rate, 1976-1987. The American Economic Review 83.3:450-472.
    [21] Kaminsky, Graciela. and Karen K. Lewis. 1996. Does foreign exchange intervention signal future monetary policy? Journal of Monetary Economics 37:285-312.
    [22] Kim Soyoung. 2003. Monetary policy, foreign exchange intervention, and the exchange rate in a unifying framework. Journal of International Economics 60:355–386.
    [23] Krishna, Kala., Kathleen Hogan, and Phillip Swagel. 1993. The Nonoptimality of Optimal Trade Policies:The U.S. Automobile Industry Revisited, 1979-1985. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 28: 273-284.
    [24] Levinsohn, James. 1995. Carwars:Trying to Make Sense of U.S.-Japan Trade Fictions in the Automobile and Automobile Parts Markets Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 22: 659-670.
    [25] Lincoln, E.J. 1999. Troubled Times: U.S.-Japan Trade Relations in the 1990s. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
    [26] McKinnon, Ronald I. 1998. International Money: Dollars, Euros, or Yen?. Unpublished paper. Stanford University.
    [27] McKinnon, Ronald. I. 1999. Strong Yen fears. The International Economy 13. 2:38-42
    [28] Miah, Fazlul., M Kabir Hassan. and S M Ikhtiar Alam. 2004. Testing the Rationality of Exchange Rate Expectations:Evidence from Survey Data. American Business Review 22. 1:11-20
    [29] Osterberg, William P. 2000. New results on the rationality of survey measures of exchange-rate expectations. Economic Review - Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland 36.1:14-21
    [30] Pekkanen, Saadia M. 1999. Aggressive Legalism: The Rules of the WTO and Japan’s Emerging Trade Strategy. New England Political Science Association 5-6: 707-737.
    [31] Raff, Horst., Young-Han Kim. and Womack, Kent L. 1996. Optimal export policy in the presence of informational barriers to entry and imperfect competition. Journal of International Economics 49:99-123.
    [32] Schawartz, Anna J. 2000. The Rise and Fall of Foreign Exchange Market: Intervention as a Policy Tool. Journal of Financial Services Research 18.2/3:319-339.
    [33] Sill, Keith. 2000. Understanding Asset Values stock price, exchange rate and Peso problem. Business Review 3:3-14.
    [34] Swenson, Deborah. L. 2001. Explaining Domestic Content:Evidence from Japanese and U.S Automobile Production in the United States. Journal of Finance 56:531-563.
    [35] Tapia, Matías. and Andrea Tokman. 2004. Effects of Foreign Exchange Intervention under Public Information:The Chilean Case. Central Bank of Chile Working Papers No. 255.
    [36] Tille, Cedric. 2001. The role of consumption substitutability in the international transmission of monetary shocks. Journal of International Economics 53:421–444.
    [37] Veronesi, Pietro. 2004. The Peso Problem Hypothesis and Stock Market Returns. Journal of Economic, Dynamics and Control 28.4:707-725

    QR CODE
    :::