在現代高度複雜與風險劇增的戰場環境中，不論是民航業者或是軍方，其直升機飛行員經常須於惡劣視覺環境（Degraded Visual Environment，DVE）中執行高難度任務。在此種環境下，其任務成效與飛行安全表現，往往不僅仰賴個人能力，更取決於風險管控制度之設計、飛行裝備支援與飛行員個人能力三者間的整合運作。有鑑於此，本研究以人因工程與SHELL模型為理論基礎，建構一套整合風險管控制度、飛行員本職學能與飛行裝備支援之系統架構，探討其對任務完成與零飛安表現的影響機制。
研究採用問卷調查法，蒐集現役陸軍直升機飛行員之實證資料，經分析驗證量表信、效度後，透過結構方程模式進行整體模型分析與假設驗證。研究結果發現，風險管控制度可有效促進飛行員本職學能與裝備支援，而飛行裝備支援則是直接強化任務成果的重要因素。更重要的是，飛行員本職學能不僅能直接提升任務效能，亦能透過制度與裝備構面發揮關鍵的中介功能，展現其在整體系統中的核心地位。
本研究強調，飛行員能力的實質價值，需置於制度流程與科技支援的整體脈絡中方能完整發揮。研究結果不僅驗證人—裝—制度三構面整合的必要性，也對惡劣視覺環境風險狀況下之部隊訓練設計、制度落實與裝備規劃提出具體建議，對於軍事飛行安全管理具高度實務與政策啟示意義。

In today’s highly complex and increasingly risky operational environments, helicopter pilots—whether in the civil aviation sector or the military—are frequently required to perform demanding missions under Degraded Visual Environment (DVE) conditions. Under such circumstances, mission performance and flight safety depend not solely on individual pilot capabilities, but rather on the integrated functioning of risk control systems, equipment support, and personal competencies. In response to this challenge, this study adopts the Human Factors Engineering framework and the SHELL model to construct a comprehensive system architecture that integrates risk management mechanisms, pilot competencies, and equipment support, aiming to examine their combined effects on mission accomplishment and zero-flight-accident performance.
Using a questionnaire survey methodology, empirical data were collected from active-duty Army helicopter pilots. Following factor analysis to validate the measurement constructs, structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed to examine the overall model and test the research hypotheses. The findings indicate that risk control mechanisms significantly enhance both pilot competencies and equipment support, while equipment support directly reinforces mission outcomes. More importantly, pilot competencies not only contribute directly to mission effectiveness but also serve as a critical mediating factor through institutional and technological dimensions, underscoring their central role within the integrated system.
This study emphasizes that the true value of pilot capability must be realized within the broader context of institutional processes and technological support. The results validate the necessity of integrating human, equipment, and institutional dimensions and offer practical and policy-relevant recommendations for training design, system implementation, and equipment planning under DVE conditions. These insights have significant implications for the advancement of military flight safety management

洪振義（1998）。直升機概論。台北市:台灣書店。
王穎駿（2007）。航空安全管理概論。台北縣: 揚智文化。
程千芳、游一龍（2011）。航空心理學。台北市:洪業文化。
張有恆（2016）。飛航安全管理（二版）。台北市：華泰文化。
顏志龍、鄭中平（2016）。給論文寫作者的統計指南：傻瓜也會跑統計。五南圖書出版公司。
王立楨（2017）。飛航解密。台北市: 遠流。
陳正昌、林曉芳（2024）。R統計軟體與多變量分析。台北:五南。
李雲寧（1995）。失事預防-飛航人因工程的永續。中華民國航空醫學會刊, 9（2）, 1-14。
李文進（1997）。人因工程學與飛航安全。中華民國航空醫學會刊, 11（1）, 35-47。
程千芳（2000）。飛航安全之人為因素與技術停飛:心理學之分析。中華民國航空醫學會刊, 14（1）, 31-41。
盧衍良、楊政樺、戎凱、賴維祥（2004）。重大飛航事故之飛安體系風險管理分析。中國航空太空學會學刊, 36（4）, 375-381。
吳克銳、徐振凱、鄭瑩妮（2009）。以紮根理論建構陸航飛行員壓力模型。復興崗學報（5）,103-126。
葉莉亭（2012）。影響飛航安全之研究。空軍軍官雙月刊,173,40-49頁。
張智仁（2019）。從風險管理面向探討海軍飛地安管控作為。海軍學術雙月刊,53（1）,76-87。

盧樹欣（2022）。參加美國南加州安全學院航空事故人為因素調查出國報告。國家運輸安全調查委員會。
梁維方、汪進財（2004）。航空公司組織安全文化之評量(碩士論文)。國立交通大學交通運輸研究所。
朱剖爾（2005）。促進空軍飛航安全預防作業衡量模式之研究(碩士論文)。崑山科技大學研究所。
吳俊銘（2014）。陸軍直升機失事人為因素之研究(碩士論文)。長榮大學高階管理碩士在職專班。
廖宏餘（2020）。航空直升機SHELL模式風險評估指標之建構與驗證(碩士論文)。僑光科技大學企業管理碩士在職專班。
國家運輸安全調查委員會（2023）。台灣飛安統計報告2014-2023。國家運輸安全調查委員會。
Bentler, P. M., & Wu, E. J. (1993). EQS/Windows user's guide. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.
Hoyle, R. H. and Kenny, D. A., (1999). Sample Size, Reliability, and Tests of Statistical Mediation, In R. Hoyle (Ed). Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd edition). New York: The Guilford Press.
Federal Aviation Administration. (2020). Aviation instructor’s handbook (FAA-H-8083-9B, pp. 1-2–1-15). U.S. Department of Transportation, Flight Standards Service.
DeVellis, R. F. & Thorpe, C. T. (2021). Scale Development: Theory and Applications. Sage Publications Inc.
Federal Aviation Administration.（2022）. Risk management handbook （FAA-H-8083-2A）. Federal Aviation Administration.
U.S. Department of the Army. （2022）. Fundamentals of flight （TC 3-04.4）. Army Publishing Directorate.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A.,(1986) The Modcrator Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statisti cal Considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6), 11 73-1182.
Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C. P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16(1), 78-117.
International Civil Aviation Organization.（1993）. Investigation of human factors in accidents and incidents （ICAO Circular 240-AN/144）. International Civil Aviation Organization.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage Focus Editions, 154, 136-162.
Baillie, S. W., & Morgan, J. M. （1996）. Helicopters and night vision goggles: A synopsis of current research on helicopter handling qualities during flight in degraded visual environments. AGARD Conference Proceedings, 592, 33-36.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
Transport Canada.（2002）. Helicopter risk management （TP 10112）. Transport Canada.
Hayes, A. F.,(2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium, Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408-420.
Lehmann, P. H., Jones, M., & Höfinger, M. (2017). Impact of turbulence and degraded visual environment on pilot workload. CEAS Aeronautical Journal, 8(3), 413-428
Johnston, S.（2022）.Flightfax May 2022:Operating in Degraded Visual Environments. U.S. Army Combat Readiness Center.
Dreslin, B., Mersinger, M. C., Patel, S., & Chaparro, A. (2023). Flying blind: Exploring the visual cues used by helicopter pilots in degraded visual environments. Human Factors in Transportation, 95, 656–664.
International Civil Aviation Organization （2023）. ICAO crisis management framework （EUR Doc 031, Second Edition）. International Civil Aviation Organization.
Weese, D. （2024）.The degraded visual environment （DVE）. Army Aviation Magazine.
Vreeken, J. （2013）. Helicopter flight in a degraded visual environment （NLR-TP-2013-559）. National Aerospace Laboratory NLR.
Vreeken, J., Haverdings, H., & Joosse, M. （2013）. Helicopter flight in a degraded visual environment （Final report EASA.2011.02）. National Aerospace Laboratory NLR
Waanders, T., Roth, F., Singer, B., Fadljevic, D., Plorin, J., Shpak, M., Hasharoni, O., & Limonad, A. （2019）. Integration and test of a degraded visual environment system on H145. European Rotorcraft Forum, Warsaw, Poland, 17-20.
Jones, R., & Bratt, R. (2019, September 30). NATO degraded visual environment research briefing (pp. 1–11). North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Defence Investment Division.
Useche, L. J. G.（2020）. An empirical evaluation of risk assessment practices from a risk consistency perspective （Master's thesis）. University of Stavanger.
Miller, J. D., Godfroy-Cooper, M., & Szoboszlay, Z. P. (2021, May 11–13). Degraded Visual Environment Mitigation (DVE-M) Program, Bumper Radar Obstacle Cueing Flight Trials 2020. Presented at the Vertical Flight Society’s 77th Annual Forum & Technology Display, Virtual Conference, Moffett Field, California, USA.
Abaco Systems（2020）. Degraded Visual Environment （DVE）: Meeting the challenge. [White paper].Abaco Systems.
U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Aviation & Missile Center.(AvMC) (2020). DVE-M fact sheet (pp. 1–2). U.S. Department of Defense.
National Transportation Safety Board （2020）. Aircraft accident investigative update: Sikorsky S-76B helicopter, N72EX, Calabasas, California, January 26, 2020. National Transportation Safety Board.
Jaenicke, R. (2023). Operating in degraded visual environments. Military Embedded Systems. https://militaryembedded.com/avionics/synthetic-vision/operating-in-degraded-visual-environments